Liar In Chief Won't Release "OBL" Photos(hopped)

the name calling really helps.
good job

Asserting that one is a liar can truly be an alleged statement of fact. When one conceals something like this it is a logical possibility. It is important that people realize that our governments repeatedly lie to us. It is important that the government knows that the people will assume the worst in cases where our administrators in this constitutional Republic obscure transparency to the people it serves. The president's raid was highly illegal, by the way, and consequently deserving of contempt from the citizenry. Vigilance is the price of maintaining the Republic. Not blind acceptance of bureaucrats. Especially ones that defile the Constitution on a daily basis.

I apologize however for extending my suspicion of the Chief Executive's dishonesty into a verbal pejorative (calling him "Liar In Chief"). It was immature of me and you were right to point it out. I am no less disgusted with President Obama, however.
 
Last edited:
To put aside any other theories for a second, lets assume for sale of argument that Obama and Obama government would never hide truth from public and will always be honest with the public. With that condition set:

But former West German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt called the killing "quite clearly a violation of international law." Geoffrey Robertson, a prominent London-based human rights lawyer, said the killing "may well have been a cold-blooded assassination" that risked making bin Laden a martyr.

Posted at 11:16 AM ET, 05/03/2011
Osama bin Laden’s killing: Was it legal?
By Melissa Bell

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ng-was-it-legal/2011/05/03/AFNxsRgF_blog.html

Looking at the questions being asked, could fear of some international law prosecution be now keeping Obama from relaeasing any photo that could be used as "evidemce" in some court in Geneva?
 
This is calculated to keep the story on the front page. They are going to drag this out times ten. The key is that we have to watch what the other hand is doing. Eventually they will release it.
 
Asserting that one is a liar can truly be an alleged statement of fact. When one conceals something like this it is a logical possibility. It is important that people realize that our governments repeatedly lie to us. It is important that the government knows that the people will assume the worst in cases where our administrators in this constitutional Republic obscure transparency to the people it serves. The president's raid was highly illegal, by the way, and consequently deserving of contempt from the citizenry.

if we want to define liar , i could say folks defending 75 yrs of lies on marijuana are flat out liars!!! That pretty much includes all elected republicans minus ron paul supporters and gary supporters and a few liberty-minded supporters! so focus your energy on the republican liars until obama registers republican!!
 
This is calculated to keep the story on the front page. They are going to drag this out times ten. The key is that we have to watch what the other hand is doing. Eventually they will release it.

How would he take back these words:

In deciding not to make public the pictures of the corpse, Obama resisted arguments that to do so could counter skeptics who have argued there is no proof bin Laden is dead.

"I think that given the graphic nature of these photos, it would create some national security risk," Obama told the CBS program "60 Minutes."

"It is important for us to make sure that very graphic photos of somebody who was shot in the head are not floating around as an incitement to additional violence. As a propaganda tool," the president added.

But then again, it's obama.
 
if we want to define liar , i could say folks defending 75 yrs of lies on marijuana are flat out liars!!! That pretty much includes all elected republicans minus ron paul supporters and gary supporters and a few liberty-minded supporters! so focus your energy on the republican liars until obama registers republican!!

You are very astute.
 
Has the President considered that it would be more constitutional to provide transparency with photographs? Rather than assuming there might be some hostile reaction from our "enemy?" Has the President considered that the citizenry might prefer transparency over what Ben Franklin referred to as "a little bit of safety?" This is a telling metaphor for Obama. Reminds me of when Bush said "it's my job to protect the American people." No, it was his job to defend the Constitution.
 
A prolific liar, in fact. I'm not sure why we shouldn't say it. Can we stop trying to calculate every single little move? We just flew into a Muslim country, killed several Muslims, burned a helicopter, stole a dead Muslim body, and left other dead Muslim bodies laying there to be cleaned up by the Muslim country's government. Plus we are militarily occupying 3 Muslim countries! And now we are worried about blowback because of a picture? WHAT?!!?
 
According to Oliver North, we don't need to see the pictures because we all KNOW OBL is dead. Just like everything else in this administration, we don't need to see the birth certificate because we all KNOW Obama was born in Hawaii. We don't need time to read the Obamacare bill, we can find out what is in it after it passes. Have you noticed, we the people do not need to know anything. Thanks for the transparency, BO.
 
According to Oliver North, we don't need to see the pictures because we all KNOW OBL is dead. Just like everything else in this administration, we don't need to see the birth certificate because we all KNOW Obama was born in Hawaii. We don't need time to read the Obamacare bill, we can find out what is in it after it passes. Have you noticed, we the people do not need to know anything. Thanks for the transparency, BO.

Oliver North: New World Order Police State Dictatorship foot soldier.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top