Leftists Won’t Be Going ‘Door-To-Door’ To Take Your Guns, Because They Won’t Have To

[Republicanguy]

If one does not own a gun then what is your solution for this?

1. Over powering lunatic or group of thugs tries to kill you and there is no time to reach for your phone to call the police. Even if you do call the police by the time they get to you while you trying to get away from them you end up either dead, raped or injured.

2. A victim of a violent crime through forced home entry wishes to prevent further injury or sexual assault by defending themselves with a gun from another attack. What is your alternative solution to stop them?

3. What do you do for 1. or 2. when the criminal is known by police but the police chose to look the other way since either the gun toting attacker is one of their own or a relative to the blue family? With 18,000 Federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies in the US it is estimated that there are close to a million officers. If you count people who work for the police, the judicial system, politicians and then add their families, friends, we are looking at millions. Within any percentage of the population there is always a percentage of deviants. These deviants are armed and above the law. A dangerous combination that requires one to be properly armed against them.

My point is, through education, not to own one in the first place. I don't think it is necessary in a city to own one, nobody in a city should.

 

[kahless]

My point is, through education, not to own one in the first place. I don't think it is necessary in a city to own one, nobody in a city should.

What I wrote applies to city folks as well. You are not protected by police 24x7 and are living in your own illusion or delusion if you actually believe you are safe because your city has police protection.

Here is the question again, if one does not own a gun then what is your solution for this?

1. Over powering lunatic or group of thugs tries to kill you and there is no time to reach for your phone to call the police. Even if you do call the police by the time they get to you while you trying to get away from them you end up either dead, raped or injured.

2. A victim of a violent crime through forced home entry wishes to prevent further injury or sexual assault by defending themselves with a gun from another attack. What is your alternative solution to stop them?

3. What do you do for 1. or 2. when the criminal is known by police but the police chose to look the other way since either the gun toting attacker is one of their own or a relative to the blue family? With 18,000 Federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies in the US it is estimated that there are close to a million officers. If you count people who work for the police, the judicial system, politicians and then add their families, friends, we are looking at millions. Within any percentage of the population there is always a percentage of deviants. The deviants within that group are armed and above the law. A dangerous combination that requires one to be properly armed against them.

 

[Swordsmyth]

My point is, through education, not to own one in the first place. I don't think it is necessary in a city to own one, nobody in a city should.

You are insane.
Cities are dangerous and guns are needed much more there than in the countryside.

 

[Republicanguy]

No, in the countryside they'd be needed, very isolated.

 

[Swordsmyth]

No, in the countryside they'd be needed, very isolated.

People in the city are isolated and can be sneaked up on easily, they also have far more criminals around.

 

[Republicanguy]

Criminals are a minority, unless all of our polluting our planet makes all one.

A city is safer than the country side, at least there are others. In the country side there no police for miles, so people are on their own. Even Barack's wife understood that, and she was correct, that owning a gun in the country side seem practical.

 

[UWDude]

Criminals are a minority, unless all of our polluting our planet makes all one.

A city is safer than the country side, at least there are others. In the country side there no police for miles, so people are on their own. Even Barack's wife understood that, and she was correct, that owning a gun in the country side seem practical.

Would you rather have a gun on you walking down the street in Montana or walking down the street in Compton?

 

[Republicanguy]

Would you rather have a gun on you walking down the street in Montana or walking down the street in Compton?

Perhaps if there weren't any, neither would be a problem. Good and bad everywhere. Seriously.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Perhaps if there weren't any, neither would be a problem. Good and bad everywhere. Seriously.

You think guns are the only weapons available to criminals?
You think they can be disinvented or kept out of the hands of everyone but government?
You are delusional.

 

[UWDude]

Perhaps if there weren't any, neither would be a problem. Good and bad everywhere. Seriously.

No guns in compton.

How do you propose to get rid of all the guns from Compton, from Chicago, from South Central, from Brooklyn and the Bronx.

With the rainbow candy gumball machine that magically makes a gangsta gun disappear every time you post an inspirational quote on Twitter?

Or were you just thinking just gas the inner cities, send in the armored-cybernetic-SWAT squads, and gather them up after removing the millions of corpses?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Criminals are a minority, unless all of our polluting our planet makes all one.

A city is safer than the country side, at least there are others. In the country side there no police for miles, so people are on their own. Even Barack's wife understood that, and she was correct, that owning a gun in the country side seem practical.

Criminals can each rob and kill many people, they don't have to be a majority.
The city is far more dangerous and statistics back that up.

 

[Republicanguy]

Like I stated, education is the key to having a society like the US have less guns. But then that means, those who manufacture lose money. That is also the problem, you see? Weapon manufacturing contributes to dishonest conflict, as well as maintaining peace.

Education is the only way to recommend, that a citizen doesn't want to own a gun. A suburb outside a city, or apartment blocks, homes in the city. There is no actual government way to do just collect the weapons, that would cost too much money, and causes legal issues with the state and Federal government, lawyers getting involved, protests.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Like I stated, education is the key to having a society like the US have less guns. But then that means, those who manufacture lose money. That is also the problem, you see? Weapon manufacturing contributes to dishonest conflict, as well as maintaining peace.

Education is the only way to recommend, that a citizen doesn't want to own a gun. A suburb outside a city, or apartment blocks, homes in the city. There is no actual government way to do just collect the weapons, that would cost too much money, and causes legal issues with the state and Federal government, lawyers getting involved, protests.

Education will never do away with crime or tyrants, only a slave looking to please his masters would claim anything different.

 

[Republicanguy]

Like you'd know, plant.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

If the right thinks gun rights are necessary to facilitate a future armed, popular revolt, they're delusional.

People who can't be bothered to spend 30 seconds voting properly aren't going to be embarking on bloody revolution.

...mind you, the state shouldn't restrict gun ownership, but that's not the reason.

And if the left is trying to confiscate guns because they think the Hover-round right is about to revolt, they are equally delusional.

Lots of hopped-up, non-reality-based rhetoric floating round these days..

 

[Swordsmyth]

Like you'd know, plant.

Better than you, slave.

 

[Republicanguy]

If the right thinks gun rights are necessary to facilitate a future armed, popular revolt, they're delusional.

People who can't be bothered to spend 30 seconds voting properly aren't going to be embarking on bloody revolution.

...mind you, the state shouldn't restrict gun ownership, but that's not the reason.

And if the left is trying to confiscate guns because they think the Hover-round right is about to revolt, they are equally delusional.

Lots of hopped-up, non-reality-based rhetoric floating round these days..

It is paranoia. The problem is, may not the issue with confiscating or giving them back to government, it is the freedom of government which made it impractical for owning a weapon in the modern world. Drugs are used, okay making them legal is an option. But then there are other problems in life that may make somebody use one since they easily available.

Then there is the businesses that profit from arms. So much for christian USA, hypocrisy and anecdotal garbage about the US being so founded on faith rules. The founders weren't overtly religious people.

 

[Swordsmyth]

It is paranoia.

If you aren't paranoid you are ignorant.

The problem is, may not the issue with confiscating or giving them back to government, it is the freedom of government which made it impractical for owning a weapon in the modern world.

Whatever that even means is nonsense.
Confiscation is conquest and they never belonged to the government.
There is no such things as "freedom of government" and owning guns is absolutely practical and necessary.

Drugs are used, okay making them legal is an option. But then there are other problems in life that may make somebody use one since they easily available.

Like being robbed or raped or murdered.

Then there is the businesses that profit from arms.

Providing people with the means to defend themselves is a worthy calling that deserves its reward.

So much for christian USA, hypocrisy and anecdotal garbage about the US being so founded on faith rules. The founders weren't overtly religious people.

[h=1]Luke 22:36[/h] “Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.”

King James Version (KJV)



Many of the founders were quite devout and the common patriot was as well.

 

[Swordsmyth]

double post

 

[Republicanguy]

No you don't see it, the arms business, they make the money from all of you who own a weapon. That is the problem with getting rid of weapons in society. I wonder why they don't make money in London. Yeah, I can't own one myself.

And yes the government allowing the freedom to own, created this problem, that is what I am getting at, this is the irony. How do you get rid of all of them owned by the citizenry, and then the criminals, who how many will still have them? Only the police and military should have them, security for the government officials.