'Lancet' BLASTS 'Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated' Propaganda

Brian4Liberty

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
63,466
'Lancet' BLASTS 'Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated' Propaganda



A prominent German researcher has published findings in the British medical journal The Lancet his evidence that vaccinated individuals are increasingly driving infection and thus referring to a "pandemic of the unvaccinated" is harmful and unnecessary. Was it all just propaganda and fearmongering? Also today, nurses are quitting vax mandate hospitals in droves and signing up for more pay where their personal freedom is valued. And...hold off on that holiday booking to Hong Kong!!!
 
[FONT=&quot]My question would be how many "breakthrough" cases have there been of people that have had COVID and then got it again? Do people with natural immunity get the disease again? If not or if very few do then why is there even a dispute about the efficacy of natural immunity?

From the article:

In the USA and Germany, high-level officials have used the term pandemic of the unvaccinated, suggesting that people who have been vaccinated are not relevant in the epidemiology of COVID-19. Officials’ use of this phrase might have encouraged one scientist to claim that “the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated for COVID-19”.1
But this view is far too simple.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]There is increasing evidence that vaccinated individuals continue to have a relevant role in transmission. In Massachusetts, USA, a total of 469 new COVID-19 cases were detected during various events in July, 2021, and 346 (74%) of these cases were in people who were fully or partly vaccinated, 274 (79%) of whom were symptomatic. Cycle threshold values were similarly low between people who were fully vaccinated (median 22·8) and people who were unvaccinated, not fully vaccinated, or whose vaccination status was unknown (median 21·5), indicating a high viral load even among people who were fully vaccinated.2
In the USA, a total of 10 262 COVID-19 cases were reported in vaccinated people by April 30, 2021, of whom 2725 (26·6%) were asymptomatic, 995 (9·7%) were hospitalised, and 160 (1·6%) died.3
In Germany, 55·4% of symptomatic COVID-19 cases in patients aged 60 years or older were in fully vaccinated individuals,4
and this proportion is increasing each week. In Münster, Germany, new cases of COVID-19 occurred in at least 85 (22%) of 380 people who were fully vaccinated or who had recovered from COVID-19 and who attended a nightclub.5
People who are vaccinated have a lower risk of severe disease but are still a relevant part of the pandemic. It is therefore wrong and dangerous to speak of a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Historically, both the USA and Germany have engendered negative experiences by stigmatising parts of the population for their skin colour or religion. I call on high-level officials and scientists to stop the inappropriate stigmatisation of unvaccinated people, who include our patients, colleagues, and other fellow citizens, and to put extra effort into bringing society together.[/FONT]
 
[FONT="]My question would be how many "breakthrough" cases have there been of people that have had COVID and then got it again? Do people with natural immunity get the disease again? If not or if very few do then why is there even a dispute about the efficacy of natural immunity?
...


There have been researchers who say that they have never had a case of someone who recovered from a confirmed case Covid catching Covid a second time.

Why? Follow the money.
 
There have been researchers who say that they have never had a case of someone who recovered from a confirmed case Covid catching Covid a second time.

Why? Follow the money.
Yet they want to mandate a person that has had COVID get vaccinated making them susceptible to who knows what. If it ain't broke don't fix it. This is horrifying that they are forcfully vaccinating people and jabbing the least susceptible little children with this Frankenstein vaccination.
 
The actual article: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02243-1/fulltext

This is from the "correspondence" section, ie equivalent to a letter to the editor.

It seems his point is that the vaccinated should not be disregarded and pretended to not be involved in transmission and the effects of the virus. I do not see how he is in any way alleging that the vaccinated are "increasingly driving infection."
 
Back
Top