Kyle Rittenhouse trial day 6 live-stream - hosted by Rekieta Law, w/commentary by Rekieta Law, et al.:
[see the first post in this thread for links to all trial videos]
Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 6 - Gaige Grosskreutz Testimony We are on Day 6 of the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse. Today is the day the state has suggested they will call Gaige Grosskreutz to the stand. This is the state's star witness and may be the last witness they call in their case in chief. Should be explosive! https://odysee.com/@RekietaLaw:a/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-day-6-gaige:5
Gaige looks somewhat normal on the stand. I wonder if the prosecution told him, "Before you can testify, you have to be totally clean from meth and soy for at east 1 month."
I hope anyone who plans on opining on the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict, whatever it may be, spends significant time watching most or all of the trial, not relying on media accounts.
Almost no trial can be credibly assessed without watching it, but especially one this fraught.
This is yet another one of those bizarre instances -- like 1/6 -- where much of the liberal-left is cheering for the prosecutors and championing pro-law-and-order theories, while the right is enthralled by civil liberties and defendants' rights.
All the more reason to watch.
If Rittenhouse had shot and killed anyone black, that would have been **the headline** of any Intercept article on his case, or any other digital outlet like it. But since all the people he shot were white, they just don't mention their race -- at all!
The word "white" appears 20 times in the Intercept's very long article on Rittenhouse (based on the unquestioned premise that he's guilty, needless to say). Each time, the word is used to accuse him of being a white supremacist, never once to identify the race of his victims.
Anyway, watch the Rittenhouse trial if you want to opine on the verdict. It's a very interesting trial. And not only will you learn next to nothing about it by relying on mainstream media summaries of it, you'll end up with negative knowledge.
[bold emphasis added - OB]
Here's a sampling of the "mainstream media summaries" mentioned by Greenwald. (Of course, none of this will come as a surprise to anyone at RPFs, and many, many other examples can easily be found by anyone who cares too look for them - but it deserves at least a little bit of documentation here.)
Note that in the following pic, only the Russia Today item gives any indication that anything in Grosskreutz's testimony might have been something that could have elicited a literal face-palm from one of the prosecutors:
Here a local Fox teleprompter-reader "reports" that "survivor" Grosskreutz testified that "his arms were raised when Rittenhouse shot him":
Kyle Rittenhouse trial day 7 live-stream - hosted by Rekieta Law, w/commentary by Rekieta Law, et al.:
[see the first post in this thread for links to all trial videos]
Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 7 - Is the Prosecution Finished?
Day 7 of this trial, (if you notice a discrepancy, I count jury selection as day 1) and the prosecution had a VERY bad day yesterday with the disastrous testimony of Gaige Grosskreutz. The state should be ending their case in chief today and then we may be moving in to the defense's case.
We may ALSO see a motion to dismiss after the state rests ... we'll see! https://odysee.com/@RekietaLaw:a/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-day-7-is-the:7
Anyway, watch the Rittenhouse trial if you want to opine on the verdict. It's a very interesting trial. And not only will you learn next to nothing about it by relying on mainstream media summaries of it, you'll end up with negative knowledge.
Anyway, watch the Rittenhouse trial if you want to opine on the verdict. It's a very interesting trial. And not only will you learn next to nothing about it by relying on mainstream media summaries of it, you'll end up with negative knowledge.
If it comes down to it, the judge should just issue a directed verdict. The judge would get murdered of course but I get the sense he ran out of fucks about that long ago.
If "facts" and "evidence" actually made a difference in this case, then there would never even have been any charges in the first place, let alone a trial.