Koch Brothers sue Cato Institute President 03/1/2012

Kochs didn't come out against Iraq War II until well after it was shown to be a disaster. They funded Cato who was opposed to the Iraq War, yes, but they also funded Heritage, who was carrying water for Bush's war.

When all else fails blame the Kochs
 
When all else fails blame the Kochs

Follow the money - In addition to CATO, who else are they funding?
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Koch_Family_Foundations

There is a pattern, and they support quite a few organizations which oppose one another. Almost like how Goldman Sachs supports the top tier of both parties...

The Koch bro's are bad news, IMO - I see their only interest is to co-opt and control the opposition of their interests... Ever wonder why they dont support Ron Paul?

Anyhow, YMMV...
 
I think the Kochs are unduly vilified. They are as much to blame for any problems within the libertarian movement as Rothbard is, who was a polarizing figure himself. Overwhelmingly they are to be commended for their advocacy of libertarianism.
[21][/B]

This is a joke. You should be banned.
 
CATO: From Libertarian to Republican?

TAC’s Jordan Bloom blogged something the other day about the struggle for the soul of the CATO Institute. Even so, I had no idea things were as bad as Eugene Volokh reports, regarding the Koch brothers forcing new board members on CATO:

Let’s take a look at a few of these new board members of ours. Kevin Gentry is a social conservative activist who’s also vice-chair of the Virginia GOP. Nancy Pfotenauer is a former spokesperson for the McCain campaign who has argued on television in favor of theIraqwar and the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy pertaining to gays in the military. Ted Olson is a Republican super-lawyer who’s never identified himself as a libertarian.
[...]
*John Hinderaker of the Powerline blog, whose firm counts Koch Industries as a client. Hinderaker has written, “It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of extraordinary vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he can’t get anyone to notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his time, and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that, when not bored, is hostile.” Hinderaker supports the Patriot Act and the Iraq War and calls himself a neocon.

*Tony Woodlief, who has been president of two Koch-created nonprofits and vice president of the Charles Koch Foundation. Woodlief has blogged about “the rotten heart of libertarianism,” calling it “a flawed and failed religion posing as a philosophy of governance” while complaining about libertarians “toking up” at political meetings.

...it seems pretty clear to me that if the Kochs have their way, CATO will cease to be libertarian in any real sense, and will instead become yet another mainline GOP ideas factory. That would be a loss.
 
The thirst for power, money, and interest exists in the Libertarian Party as well. How do you think this country strayed to begin with? :P
 
If Kochs had spent 39 million to finance Ron Paul compain instead of on Cato per year, they would really have made a difference and supported cause of Liberty.
 
Last edited:
Giving money to Heritage has the effect of supporting the Iraq War, though.


No.
yes:
Then there’s Justin Raimando, the “conservative-paleo-libertarian” editorial director of Antiwar.com, who gave the billionaires two thumbs up, writing last summer: “The Kochs, and Cato, have been staunch opponents of the Af-Pak war, as well as the escalation of the war on our civil liberties that George W. Bush started and Obama has continued.” Nick Gillespie, the leather-jacket-wearing libertarian editor in chief of Reason.com, even links to an anonymous self reddit post that pretty much says the same thing.

fyi, in that article they criticize the kich brothers because they supply the army with army and made 6 million from food they supply to them, which is basically extra change for them...

So they did support antiwar.org
 
Amen. These guys cannot be trusted. They're keeping people away from liberty with their watered-down corporate whore bullshit version of it pushed through their slimy thinktanks
not quite...
the Koch brothers are hell bent on getting obama out and getting rid of Obamacare, i think they see obamacare as the line in the sand. Unfortunately they fail to realize that none of the republicans running will get rid of Obamacare as much as they say it, if any of them would get elected what we would get is a different form of Obamacare where insurance companies still win and we all lose... Silly them for not seeing this and not throwing millions at trying to get RP nominated... so fuck them
 
Things do not add up with the Koch brothers. It gives me an uneasy feeling. Like many have pointed out there are a lot of contradictions and oddities in their behavior and donations. Libertarian? Yet they do not support Ron Paul, but were great buddies with Mr. Herman Cain. I don't trust them.
 
yes:

fyi, in that article they criticize the kich brothers because they supply the army with army and made 6 million from food they supply to them, which is basically extra change for them...

So they did support antiwar.org
Justin Raimondo saying nice things about the Koch brothers isn't the same as the Koch brothers supporting antiwar.org. It's the reverse.

If Ames and Levine are going to become the "go to" team for the dirt on libertarians, such as it is, they ought to learn their subject. Because the very idea of Charles and David Koch leading a national resistance movement involving civil disobedience on a massive scale is laughable: to anyone who knows them, or knows of them in more than a glancing way, this can only provoke gales of unrestrained laughter. It is sheer laziness to believe this. Indeed, if only the Brothers Koch, and the plethora of organizations their money has funded, were that radical! Unfortunately, they are not: a stodgy, boring conservatism marks both their methods and their politics, and always has.

Ames and Levine need to do some real research. It was the anti-Koch wing of the libertarian movement, centered around LewRockwell.com, that first gave John Tyner’s act of defiance the publicity and velocity that made it go viral. And if LRC is a front for the Koch brothers, then we have truly entered Bizarro World. In that case, so too is Antiwar.com a Koch front – and so why have we been doing this fundraising campaign for the past two weeks, begging our readers to save us from oblivion?

Gee, it seems like that check from the Kochs got lost in the mail! Charles, could you please look into that? Thanks.
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/11/25/libertarians-against-the-regime/

I like Justin Raimondo, but he isn't right about everything. He's been very wrong on a few things.
 
Last edited:
Things do not add up with the Koch brothers. It gives me an uneasy feeling. Like many have pointed out there are a lot of contradictions and oddities in their behavior and donations. Libertarian? Yet they do not support Ron Paul, but were great buddies with Mr. Herman Cain. I don't trust them.

This
 
So, they're in opposition to Lew Rockwell? What has the relationship been between them and Ron Paul? It seems a little strange that they pay lip service to all the libertarian ideas yet they're completely silent on Ron Paul.
 
Back
Top