Do you think vote flipping only happens at the voting machine or don't you?
I think votes are flipped when the ballots themselves are incorrect or changed. That is the physical vote. When a hobo living under a bridge tweets that aliens told him that Dominion voting machines flipped millions of votes, I don't think that people envision a fucked-up Excel spreadsheet, they picture voting machines printing ballots incorrectly.
Which, by the way, has also been alleged on this forum, that machines printed ballots which
appeared to vote for Trump but
actually voted for Biden.
Because you've argue inconsistently on that.
No.
The truth is that the Dominion "election management system" was involved in the whole process. That is from the voting to the tabulating to combining the tabulating that is reported as the official result. I got all of this from YOUR link, so thank you for helping me disprove your argument.
No.
From your own post:
In order to report unofficial results, county clerks useelection management system software to combine the electronic totals from tabulators and submit a report of unofficial results. Because the clerk did not update software, even though the tabulators counted all the ballots correctly, those accurate results were not combined properly when the clerk reported unofficial results.
From the very next line in the report, which you must have just... overlooked somehow:
The correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape and on the ballots themselves. Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass. Boards of County Canvassers, which are composed of 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans, review the printed totals tape from each tabulator during the canvass to verify the reported vote totals are correct.
And just because a paper trail allows such problems to be "fixed" doesn't mean they weren't real problems. That's why the recounts netted Trump thousands of additional real votes.
The "such problems" that you link have nothing to do with Dominion software, "vote flipping" or anything of the sort. There were no "such problems" netting Trump thousands of votes in any state.
The problem occurred because county election officials didn’t upload votes from a memory card in an ballot scanning machine, said Gabriel Sterling, the state’s voting system manager.
Is that also Dominion's fault?
Of course those were not enough to change the outcome. But that wasn't the only problem. Add to that the "vote harvesting issue." Even proponents of the mass mail in ballot scheme will admit that not all of the Georgia ballot drop boxes were secure. Why is that a problem? Because each state has a database who votes in which primaries. Do if you have access to that database on your cellphone and you go to an un-secure drop box, you can go through all the ballots and toss the ones for voters who have voted in Republican primaries. And that doesn't get to the issue of volunteers "helping people" fill out their ballots. Yep, that happens in all elections, but it potentially happened on a much larger scale this time.
This argument is nonsensical for a number of reasons. "Potentially happened" is the biggest one.
Potentially, all ballots for the 2020 election were sent through a highly sensitive ham detector. Every time the ham detector detected a trace of ham, or any other pork product, on a ballot, it segregated that ballot from the non-ham ballots. In this way, the deep state created two piles of ballots, one of intermingled Jewish and Muslim ballots, and the other of intermingled Christian and atheist ballots. The second pile was then sent through an equally sensitive semen detector, and any cum-covered ballots were placed in a third pile of likely atheists. Knowing that the cumless ham ballots were the most likely of any of the piles of ballots to be Trump ballots, they then discarded
just enough of those ballots to ensure Biden's victory.
It potentially happened. In 2024, Republican voters should cum on their ballot envelopes to prevent this from potentially happening again.
Moving on, for this argument to even matter you would have to first believe that election officials are generally honest, even in heavily Democratic areas. If they were not, you wouldn't need "unofficial" methods such as this at all, you'd just use the election officials. It wouldn't matter if the boxes were secure or insecure, and so on. Do you believe that election officials are generally honest?
Additionally, data exists which could be used to detect ballot box gremlins who had disproportionately stolen Republican ballots. Most states allow mail-in voters to view the status of their mail-in ballot on a website. Beyond that, publicly available statistics give a breakdown of mail-in ballot request and submission statistics, and in most states that breakdown is county-by-county. If some enterprising bullshit artist wished to invent some statistics on the prevalence of ballot box gremlins in the 2020 election, then
I wish them the best of luck with this data.
It seems to me that you agree that the election errors which have been detected thus far are both a) incapable of surviving an audit or recount and b) incapable of materially affecting the election results. And so I'm left wondering what you're actually arguing about.
Pants on fire.
