Kate Steinle Verdict - Not Guilty

r3volution 3.0 said:
Da komrad, I'm aware of your belief in the communal ownership of the national territory.
Click to expand...

I am aware that your fellow heretics at the ComIntern deny that groups any smaller than all of mankind can exert any form of ownership or control over property tovaritch, as long as our foundational premises are different any further discussion is pointless.
 
euphemia said:
Stinking California judges and juries can't get anything right. This was at least negligent homicide. He was an illegal deported many times who should not have had a gun. He was out on a crowded dock and shot the gun he wasn't supposed to have. He killed a woman.

Once again, you people who think an armed population would have prevented this, are very, very wrong. Once the shot was fired, there was no saving Kate.
Click to expand...

Well, you are right about her being dead and armed populace would not have stopped it however you are forgetting the "justice" part of this equation. If an armed person had pulled out his gun and killed the creep at least he would not be walking free tonight.

I don't believe that "borders" will stop these kinds of crimes (they never had and they never will). Crimes will not go away. Your goonerment will never keep you safe. Laws are a joke. If you want to be safe you must provide for your own safety however you can. If you feel that carrying a gun makes you safer (I would agree) then carry one...
 
r3volution 3.0 said:
If you mean that deporting innocent people is a tragedy, I agree.

[FONT=&]Seven victimless crimes...

And the monstrous offense for which he was being held in San Fransisco before they released him?

The horror...
[/FONT]
Click to expand...

You really are not thinking clearly. Seven so-called victimless crimes were what he was caught doing. You doing have even the tiniest clue what else he has done, and we darn sure know there is one dead victim because the other crimes were either not discovered or we didn't find a way to keep this horrible excuse for a human being out of the country. Likely the seven and the unknowns emboldened him to do shoot a woman in cold blood. He was never innocent.

Keep on with your foolishness. You know it will never sell.
 
euphemia said:
Stinking California judges and juries can't get anything right. This was at least negligent homicide. He was an illegal deported many times who should not have had a gun. He was out on a crowded dock and shot the gun he wasn't supposed to have. He killed a woman.

Once again, you people who think an armed population would have prevented this, are very, very wrong. Once the shot was fired, there was no saving Kate.
Click to expand...

Oh, don't you worry about the gun possession charge. There was no question that they would find him guilty of that. Can't have people with guns out there, they might shoot someone...
 
These types of trials are decided at jury selection time. That is where the prosecution failed.

The guy aimed and fired at her. His elevation was off (thus the ricochet), but his line was right on. "Stepped on the gun in a T-shirt". LOL. Maybe he ate some Twinkies that made him do it...
 
And also let's not forget....that attempted murder... of... an endangered species....that ain't legal either..


The Dude: What are you, a fuckin Park Ranger now??

 
Last edited:
If it was deliberate, he was a heck of a shot.

Evans said it appeared the bullet struck the ground about 15 feet from where Garcia Zarate was sitting and then traveled the length of a football field before striking Steinle.
Click to expand...

A Bureau of Land Management ranger reported the semiautomatic handgun had been stolen from his SUV several days before the shooting. A police diver found it in San Francisco Bay the day after the shooting.
Click to expand...

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-steinle-trial-20171030-story.html
 
This moron first told the authorities that he was attempting to shoot at the nearby sea lions, which makes me question his judgement even further.
 
Zippyjuan said:
If it was deliberate, he was a heck of a shot.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-steinle-trial-20171030-story.html
Click to expand...

"appeared". Call me skeptical about that evaluation. I would guess it would have to hit the ground further away (lesser angle) from the shooter to maintain it's energy to kill her. No doubt no one did any experiments to confirm or deny the hypothesis. Now if he was shooting at a bird on the ground, then 15 feet away might make sense, but that excuse was never used.

While it wouldn't be terribly hard for an experienced shooter to hit a person at 100 yards (taking their time), there would be some (bad) luck involved for a beginner. He may have been aiming at a seal, or the father, or people on the pier in general. But it lined up with Kate.
 
Even the people in Mexico and Latin America are sick of these shitbirds. Some of the most vigilant border wall advocates are former immigrants who went through the legal process.
 
Swordsmyth said:
Nope, not being let in or being kicked out of a place you were not allowed is not a tragedy.

[FONT=&]

The drug war is a separate issue.
Click to expand...

Nope.
Not since it's creation has it been separated from anything.

The entire legal "system" the MASSIVE INCREASE IN ENFORCERS OF CONTROL,
Several wars, and related foreign policy

and the Economy..

Hell yes it is an issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
Immigration-Control Tyranny
Replies
4
Views
60
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
Immigration-Control Tyranny
Replies
11
Views
70
acptulsa
acptulsa
jmdrake
Joe Rogan : "You gotta get scared that people who are not criminals are being set to El Salvador prisons."
27 28 29
Replies
561
Views
3K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
PAF
Trump Revives the Alien & Sedition Acts
Replies
9
Views
89
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
PAF
No, Powell Is Not “Keeping Interest Rates High”
Replies
10
Views
88
oyarde
O
Back
Top