Kamala Only Won States Where Voter ID Not Required

DamianTV

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2007
Messages
20,677
https://www.infowars.com/posts/coincidence-kamala-only-won-in-states-where-voter-id-is-not-required

X users highlighted a curious anomaly on the day after the 2024 presidential election, pointing out Democrat candidate Kamala Harris only bested GOP opponent Donald Trump in states where voter ID is not required.

“Kamala won all the states that don’t require voter ID,” one X user declared in a viral post that garnered over 83K likes and 3.6 million views as of writing.

...

Nope, no coinkidink!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
Nothing against Infowars, BUT... has this been verified anywhere else?
I'm being too lazy tonight to start looking myself.
 
Incorrect.
Virginia requires ID. We also have a governor who has been fighting the courts to successfully remove ballot access from noncitizens.

Northern Virginia also has about twice the population it had prior to 9/11. The federal wealth transfer of the last 23 years has funneled unbelievable amounts of money here. It's been nonstop gigantic construction projects the entire time.

I am pretty convinced that between good old fashioned federal graft (and the knowledge that this now might end under Trump), an abnormally high immigrant population, and an overt attempt by the Virginia Republican Party to turn the state into a literal fascist state that literally bucks SCOTUS, it's just a place that has been massively mishandled for the last 20 years and the 200k extra blue votes are probably legit.
 
Last edited:
Hmmm....

kJsnOCxffXReVPWGTGvptG.jfif
 
Incorrect.
Virginia requires ID. We also have a governor who has been fighting the courts to successfully remove ballot access from noncitizens.

Northern Virginia also has about twice the population it had prior to 9/11. The federal wealth transfer of the last 23 years has funneled unbelievable amounts of money here. It's been nonstop gigantic construction projects the entire time.

I am pretty convinced that between good old fashioned federal graft (and the knowledge that this now might end under Trump), an abnormally high immigrant population, and an overt attempt by the Virginia Republican Party to turn the state into a literal fascist state that literally bucks SCOTUS, it's just a place that has been massively mishandled for the last 20 years and the 200k extra blue votes are probably legit.

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to fisharmor again."
 
Incorrect.
Virginia requires ID. We also have a governor who has been fighting the courts to successfully remove ballot access from noncitizens.

Northern Virginia also has about twice the population it had prior to 9/11. The federal wealth transfer of the last 23 years has funneled unbelievable amounts of money here. It's been nonstop gigantic construction projects the entire time.

I am pretty convinced that between good old fashioned federal graft (and the knowledge that this now might end under Trump), an abnormally high immigrant population, and an overt attempt by the Virginia Republican Party to turn the state into a literal fascist state that literally bucks SCOTUS, it's just a place that has been massively mishandled for the last 20 years and the 200k extra blue votes are probably legit.

There are a couple of exceptions that make the headline incorrect.
They don't change the fact that nearly all of her states don't require any ID and only one or two require photo ID.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
So let's see. Blue states are simultaneously more likely to go blue (duh) in a presidential election and also more likely not to have voter ID laws. So....? Trump won all 7 swing states. This is another non story.

"Blue" states are election fraud states, that's why they change their laws to facilitate it.

"We stole the elections so we can't have stolen the elections" is not an argument.
 
"Blue" states are election fraud states, that's why they change their laws to facilitate it.

"We stole the elections so we can't have stolen the elections" is not an argument.

Of course that's not an argument. That's a straw man argument you made up to knock own! :rolleyes: Blue states are states that are so liberal that the election doesn't need to be stolen from a Republican. Donald Trump wasn't going to win California and everybody, including you, knows that. So the lack of voter ID laws in California are irrelevant. Do any of the 7 swing states lack voter ID laws? That's the question.
 
Of course that's not an argument. That's a straw man argument you made up to knock own! :rolleyes: Blue states are states that are so liberal that the election doesn't need to be stolen from a Republican. Donald Trump wasn't going to win California and everybody, including you, knows that. So the lack of voter ID laws in California are irrelevant. Do any of the 7 swing states lack voter ID laws? That's the question.
That's bunk and you know it.
It happens repeatedly that the left wins elections in a swing or red state and then alters the laws to facilitate cheating and the right never wins an election there again.
And hordes of people flee the blue stolen states because they can never vote their way out, no matter how crazy and unpopular the left becomes.
If they weren't cheating they wouldn't alter the laws to facilitate cheating and outlaw investigating fraud.

You aren't this stupid.
 
That's bunk and you know it.
It happens repeatedly that the left wins elections in a swing or red state and then alters the laws to facilitate cheating and the right never wins an election there again.
.

Oregon instituted permanent mail-in ballots two decades ago, and has been blue since.
 
That's bunk and you know it.
It happens repeatedly that the left wins elections in a swing or red state and then alters the laws to facilitate cheating and the right never wins an election there again.
And hordes of people flee the blue stolen states because they can never vote their way out, no matter how crazy and unpopular the left becomes.
If they weren't cheating they wouldn't alter the laws to facilitate cheating and outlaw investigating fraud.

You aren't this stupid.

Dude YOU ARE THE ONE BEING STUPID! We're talking about a particular scenario namely the U.S. presidential election! And you can't "steal" a U.S. presidential election by getting more votes in a state you are already guaranteed to win! Your word salad is worse than Kamala's. The polls didn't lie. Trump simply didn't have a chance to win in states like California and New York. You damn well know that's the truth.
 
Last edited:
Oregon instituted permanent mail-in ballots two decades ago, and has been blue since.

The pre-election polls in Oregon, including polls done by REPUBLICANS, had Kamala Harris up by double digits. It's an unwinnible state for Republicans, mail in ballots or no mail in ballots.
 
The pre-election polls in Oregon, including polls done by REPUBLICANS, had Kamala Harris up by double digits. It's an unwinnible state for Republicans, mail in ballots or no mail in ballots.

I really would like to Eastern Oregon split off into their own state or merge in with Idaho...
 
I don't play their games either. These marxists, posing as anarchists, bait people into pages long discussions over their nonsense. Not me!

So now everyone that doesn't fall lock step behind every pro Trump conspiracy theory is a marxist? Seriously? Trump won. Yaayyy! That's not enough I guess.
 
Back
Top