Kade's back

[Conza88]

That's harsh, Bman. I don't always agree with Conza and sometimes he can get nasty but I appreciate the excellent educational (and not total fluff entertainment) material he's compiled. He is also very insightful. Just because you don't "need" to read the books and articles or watch the films and videos doesn't make them less valuable as a resource. People are joining us every day. The more we have to offer the better.

^ likes conza too

:o Thanks guys

 

[Roxi]

welcome back!

 

[user]

Hi guys!

 

[Bman]

Lmfao. You're pushing to maintain and defend a modern day mercantilism system, the monopoly on intellectual "property".

I then tell you to read "Against Intellectual Monopoly" and "Against Intellectual Property" and they are same how NOT on topic? Get a clue champ.

You said you would, and that was it. Didn't hear no reply.

I told you I would make my statement when I finished reading the books. Now I have things to do besides read books you recommend. This will take sometime.

The state is crap. Intellectual "property" is crap and irrational. Anyone who supports both, well, crap.

Well, Like I said I'll make my remarks when I have finished reading. But I will say so far I return your sentiment.

Ah my agenda, truth and justice. What's yours? Mercantilism? That's what IP is btw. Granted, I'm still reading and honing my arguments (I am new to the concept), I'll also honing my resources etc. Always relevant information though.

Your agenda to me stinks of socialism. You just can't see that for some reason. But that is because you and me have different opinons on property. You'd like to declare what is mine as everyones. This is socialism my friend.

Just as long as it's justified. Good luck with that.

You don't think your an ass at times? Well at least I can admit it. You need to get a clue.

I was actually semi pleased you were back. Then right off the bat, all you do is throw insults and play the victim. Same old Kade....

Actually, I'm rather glad when people don't agree. A challenge can be stimulating. I guess you wouldn't understand that. Since the only way things can ever be is your way.

 

[constituent]

I told you I would make my statement when I finished reading the books...


You don't think your an ass at times? Well at least I can admit it. You need to get a clue.


...


Actually, I'm rather glad when people don't agree. A challenge can be stimulating. I guess you wouldn't understand that. Since the only way things can ever be is your way.

zomg, you make it sound like the two of you are married.

 

[Aratus]

welcome back Kade! were you happily lurking these past few months? long time no see!

 

[Conza88]

Your agenda to me stinks of socialism. You just can't see that for some reason. But that is because you and me have different opinons on property. You'd like to declare what is mine as everyones. This is socialism my friend.

Sorry... come again You believe the Austrian School of Economics is socialist?

If you do - you're an idiot. </non ad hominem, statement of fact>

Actually, I'm rather glad when people don't agree. A challenge can be stimulating. I guess you wouldn't understand that. Since the only way things can ever be is your way.

Truth and justice tend to be like that. I ain't into polylogism.

zomg, you make it sound like the two of you are married.

lmao

 

[werdd]

WB kade.

 

[lucius]

Dear Kind Sir:

In your absence, you have seemed to have aquired quite a large tab down at the Green Dragon. Please settle this in a timely matter and look forward to your many discourses/observations...

 

[Kade]

I was actually semi pleased you were back. Then right off the bat, all you do is throw insults and play the victim. Same old Kade....

You took a lot of cheap shots at me while I was gone... You are upset that I don't harbor feelings of gratitude? It is easy to attack a target that you can define on your own terms.

 

[ItsTime]

Welcome back! Obama illegally bombed Pakistan today just for you!

http://news.antiwar.com/2009/02/14/us-drone-strike-kills-at-least-30-in-south-waziristan/

 

[pcosmar]

Welcome back! Obama illegally bombed Pakistan today just for you!

http://news.antiwar.com/2009/02/14/us-drone-strike-kills-at-least-30-in-south-waziristan/

Meet the new Boss.
same as the old boss.

 

[Kade]

Welcome back! Obama illegally bombed Pakistan today just for you!

http://news.antiwar.com/2009/02/14/us-drone-strike-kills-at-least-30-in-south-waziristan/

What is that suppose to mean?

 

[user]

What is that suppose to mean?

I think it means you support the deaths of innocent people, whether it's your intention or not.

 

[raystone]

Obama isn't taking your guns away you backwater hicks. Go outside and shoot cans.

//

 

[Bman]

Sorry... come again You believe the Austrian School of Economics is socialist?

Well if you take something from someone and give it to everyone that is socialism defined!

If that confuses you I don't know what else to say. And any Austrian economist who believes in standing AIP, better check himself if he doesn't think he bleeds some green socialist blood. Face it IP is not an agent of the free market. Ideas are additions not necessary agents of the free market. To date any argument I've heard against IP could also be used against PP. But, I'll wait to finish reading before I show you just how socialist my reading believes me this topic to be.

If you do - you're an idiot. </non ad hominem, statement of fact>

That may be the most dogmatic remark I've ever heard. You make me think that Theocrat might actually be open minded enough to vote someone into the presidency who is a practicing Pagan.

Truth and justice tend to be like that. I ain't into polylogism.



lmao

Truth and Justice? More like opinion and two faces.

You may be laughing, but in the grand scope of things, you are losing. THANK GOD!

 

[Kludge]

//

 

[user]

Are you saying anyone who doesn't believe in intellectual property "rights" is a state socialist?

 

[Bman]

Are you saying anyone who doesn't believe in intellectual property "rights" is a state socialist?

BINGO!

My only question is why go that far and not apply the same logic to resources.

 

[user]

BINGO!

My only question is why go that far and not apply the same logic to resources.

Many libertarians believe in property rights but not intellectual property "rights". A lot of work has gone into showing the difference.