Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions

Swordsmyth

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
74,737
The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against four states this week, claiming their climate actions conflict with federal authority and President Donald Trump’senergy dominance agenda.

The DOJ on Wednesday filed lawsuits against Hawaii and Michigan over their plans for legal action against fossil fuel companies for harms caused by climate change. On Thursday, the DOJ sued New York and Vermont, challenging their climate superfund laws that would force fossil fuel companies to pay into state-based funds based on previous greenhouse gas emissions.

“These burdensome and ideologically motivated laws and lawsuits threaten American energy independence and our country’s economic and national security,” Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement, noting the office hopes to stop “these illegitimate impediments to the production of affordable, reliable energy that Americans deserve.”

The DOJ’s four filings said the state efforts undermine the federal government while “increasing energy costs and disrupting the national energy market.” It said the states’ plans and policies are unconstitutional, violate the federal foreign affairs power and are preempted by the Clean Air Act — a federal law authorizing the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate air emissions.

The DOJ argued the act “creates a program for regulating air pollution in the United States and ‘displaces’ the ability of States to regulate greenhouse gas emissions beyond their borders.”

It said Wednesday that Hawaii and Michigan battling oil and gas companies for alleged climate damage conflicts with EPA authority and obstructs the agency’s discretion to regulate greenhouse gases.

Thursday’s filings called the states’ Superfund Acts — modeled after the 45-year-old federal superfund law enacted to address the harm associated with hazardous waste sites — “a transparent monetary-extraction scheme.” Trump has said the superfund laws “extort” money from energy entities.

New York is looking for $75 billion and has been previously challenged by 22 states for its law; Vermont hasn’t specified its target amount. Both laws were approved last year.

The DOJ argued the states’ acts are also looking to regulate greenhouse gas emissions — nationwide and globally — violating federal government authority, along with discouraging “investment and innovation in the fossil fuel industry, further burdening interstate commerce.”

More at:
Code:
https://apnews.com/article/trump-doj-climate-states-policy-lawsuits-a5228e1dd6348f09d2a70f460142531a

 
Sue them over their gun laws.

All the Lefty states.

And then sue yourselves, over the ATF's non violent enforcements.
 
Sue them over their gun laws.

All the Lefty states.

And then sue yourselves, over the ATF's non violent enforcements.

Alert: DOJ Announces Plan To Restore 2A Rights At State Level​


Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBWxxZmv-4M

 

Alert: DOJ Announces Plan To Restore 2A Rights At State Level​


Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBWxxZmv-4M




I like how she said "I might do something about that" , and William said "THIS IS HUGE!"

[See how it's done @Swordsmyth ? Instead of "bunk", I actually listened to it before I commented, and provided actual quotes.]


Let me interpret:

Civil Rights Division: evil, bad, should be eliminated when D is in control, but perfectly fine and dandy when R is in control, even though most of our civil rights violations have been by republicans. [See Chuck Baldwin thread]


In other news:

Whoa! Instead of eliminating the ATF and other 3 letter agencies, Trump is "proposing" a less than half a million dollar "efficiency" coupon!!! 🙄

Under the budget proposal released today, the ATF would receive $468 million less than this year's budget of roughly $1.62 BILLION.


In not in the news:

How come Trump doesn't focus his efforts on the following which wouldn't cost a nickel? Oh, because he's the one whose violating them:

"Civil and political rights are a class of rights that protect individuals' freedom from infringement by governments, social organizations, and private individuals. They ensure one's entitlement to participate in the civil and political life of society and the state. Civil rights generally include ensuring peoples' physical and mental integrity, life, and safety, protection from discrimination, the right to privacy, the freedom of thought, speech, religion, press, assembly, and movement. Political rights include natural justice in law, such as the rights of the accused, including the right to a fair trial; due process; the right to seek redress or a legal remedy; and rights of participation in civil society and politics such as freedom of association, the right to assemble, the right to petition, the right of self-defense, and the right to vote. These rights also must follow the legal norm as in they must have the force of law and fit into the system of administrative justice."

Republicans: always saying just the right words to give hopium that government is going to "fix" things for you - right up to the point before they become actually worse.
 
Last edited:
.

The funniest part to me is the fact that so many so-called “liberty advocates/activists” cheer so loudly when the fed gov starts dictating things to the states because those things happen to be things they like, without realizing that this makes them LESS free, no matter what policy the feds are dictating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAF
.

The funniest part to me is the fact that so many so-called “liberty advocates/activists” cheer so loudly when the fed gov starts dictating things to the states because those things happen to be things they like, without realizing that this makes them LESS free, no matter what policy the feds are dictating.

You mean like:

she said "I might do something about that" , and William said "THIS IS HUGE!"
 
Last edited:
.

The funniest part to me is the fact that so many so-called “liberty advocates/activists” cheer so loudly when the fed gov starts dictating things to the states because those things happen to be things they like, without realizing that this makes them LESS free, no matter what policy the feds are dictating.
The Feds are supposed to dictate the BoR to the states.
That makes us MORE free.
 
The Feds are supposed to dictate the BoR to the states.
That makes us MORE free.
.

No, they are not. That only came along after Lincoln.

You really should try reading some original source material sometime. It would clear up some of these areas where you certainly seem to be having difficulty.
 
.

No, they are not. That only came along after Lincoln.

You really should try reading some original source material sometime. It would clear up some of these areas where you certainly seem to be having difficulty.
You are spouting lies designed to destroy the BoR by using the states.

A6:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The BoR is the most important part of the Constitution.
 
No Founding Father ever: "These rights are GOD given and absolutely required for liberty, let's allow the states to violate them."
 
Back
Top