Just woke up this morning and find out that...

Some recounts. inb4 the tin foil hats take over this thread claiming voter fraud.
 
1stAmendguy said:
Not all of the NV precincts have reported yet? WTF? Why is it taking so long?
Click to expand...


So you thought you would immediately start a new thread to ask rather than reading one of the countless threads already discussing the subject? Just sayin' dude...
 
The One said:
So you thought you would immediately start a new thread to ask rather than reading one of the countless threads already discussing the subject? Just sayin' dude...
Click to expand...

Psh... I searched the forum and didn't find a single thread on this... :D
 
So you thought you would immediately start a new thread to ask rather than reading one of the countless threads already discussing the subject? Just sayin' dude...
Click to expand...

Not everyone has time to read 10 threads. Would someone please summarize.
 
HeyArchie said:
Some recounts. inb4 the tin foil hats take over this thread claiming voter fraud.
Click to expand...
I don't get how its "tin foil hats" when the one correction we all saw was Ron Paul picking up over fifty votes while each and other candidate lost votes. The #1 sign of election fraud is the entrance and exit polling. So what is that polling saying about Paul's numbers? Oh thats right, that Gingrich & Paul are in a near tie for 2nd place. Lets keep objective about the situation. If the finish shows Gingrich getting much more than 19% or Paul getting a lot less, that is a sign of fraud. Its not remotely close to proof but it is evidence if it happens. So lets see where the finish is at and then worry about it.
 
We saw the first transparent, democratic election of our lifetimes last night. It was Shel Adelsons after-hour party with live filming of the vote count. No Diebold. No transporting ballot boxes before counting. Guess who won and by how much. I wish we could see all precinct vote totals recorded so transparently.

To me, it validates all the online polls, the mis-matched majority of yard signs and bumper stickers, the overheard restaurant conversations of people wondering why nobody else likes Ron Paul, the pre-debate Ron Paul supporters waving signs while no other candidate has any.

Been fooled enough. Joe Stalin was right and that's the end of story.
 
centure7 said:
I don't get how its "tin foil hats" when the one correction we all saw was Ron Paul picking up over fifty votes while each and other candidate lost votes. The #1 sign of election fraud is the entrance and exit polling. So what is that polling saying about Paul's numbers? Oh thats right, that Gingrich & Paul are in a near tie for 2nd place. Lets keep objective about the situation. If the finish shows Gingrich getting much more than 19% or Paul getting a lot less, that is a sign of fraud. Its not remotely close to proof but it is evidence if it happens. So lets see where the finish is at and then worry about it.
Click to expand...
Or maybe it is a sign of how many people voted. Crazy, huh?

Let's get over ourselves here. I agree that the "democracy" here is a joke. Not the election process, really, but the way politicians are bought and sold.

I don't think they need to fix the numbers because Ron's support just isn't as big as we think it is. If it was, there's no way they could control the numbers.
 
Forty Twice said:
We saw the first transparent, democratic election of our lifetimes last night. It was Shel Adelsons after-hour party with live filming of the vote count. No Diebold. No transporting ballot boxes before counting. Guess who won and by how much. I wish we could see all precinct vote totals recorded so transparently.
Click to expand...

So Adelson had to pay for CNN to cover this, right? Would there be a lot of costs by doing this at every precinct and letting the people moniter the votes?
 
"Shel Adelsons after-hour party with live filming of the vote count."
"Adelson had to pay for CNN to cover this, right?"

I'm thinking they (the establishment GOP) were expecting there would be a huge Gingrich win at that location (due to mostly Jewish voters), televised and all.

It really splattered on their faces like a wet meringue pie.
 
I'm just wondering why every vote isn't counted like this. They don't have to put them all on major networks, but if they could be viewed online people would watch. Is cost a factor? I think the people should demand this.
 
"If the American people knew the truth there would be riots in the streets by morning" (or something along those lines)...sadly I hardly hear a whimper
 
I don't know how Newt is in 2nd, I honestly can't believe it. I was volunteer in Clark County at Valley High School and Newt only had 50 votes to Ron's 115 (37 precincts). Plus the Adelson caucus which he destroyed with 183 votes to Newt's 57.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brian4Liberty
'Woke' Walz - Can He Save Kamala?
Replies
2
Views
663
Aratus
A
Occam's Banana
Woke Hollywood lost, and that's a great thing
Replies
2
Views
848
TheTexan
TheTexan
Working Poor
Deathly Ill
Replies
9
Views
3K
Liberty_Tree
Liberty_Tree
Swordsmyth
DOGE Works: First of Thousands? Crooked Government Official Jailed After Trillions Stolen from the Biden Administration – Here’s What We Know!
Replies
8
Views
92
unknown
unknown
fisharmor
Any other carnivores still here?
2
Replies
30
Views
14K
buenijo
B
Back
Top