Kurt Evans
Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
- Messages
- 135
--
Last edited:
I'm happy for him. As to lying to federal investigators... if its been found legal for federal investigators/police to lie to everybody else, then I think the reverse should be legal as well.
I would say it's good to have a relative in the US Senate.
So if he had said nothing to the feds this case would be closed.The judge dismissed all charges against Benton except for a count of lying to federal investigators, according to Politico... Both Pauls had questioned the timing of the indictment, which was handed down shortly before the first Republican presidential primary debate of the 2016 election cycle.
ok, lets put some logic with this.
If you've done nothing wrong, and a judge rules you innocent, and then rules you guilty of lying...but you did nothing wrong...that means benton would have had to of lied and said he DID do something wrong lol.
You cant lie about being innocent. smh.
Benton probably just didnt over-expose the truth and the feds just wanted to hammer him with something.
The judge also threw out all four counts against John Tate, another Paul family aide who works with Benton on America’s Liberty PAC. A six-charge indictment still stands against a third Paul aide, Dimitri Kesari.
No, I don't think so.ok, lets put some logic with this.
If you've done nothing wrong, and a judge rules you innocent, and then rules you guilty of lying...but you did nothing wrong...that means benton would have had to of lied and said he DID do something wrong lol.
You cant lie about being innocent. smh.
ok, lets put some logic with this.
If you've done nothing wrong, and a judge rules you innocent, and then rules you guilty of lying...but you did nothing wrong...that means benton would have had to of lied and said he DID do something wrong lol.
You cant lie about being innocent. smh.
Benton probably just didnt over-expose the truth and the feds just wanted to hammer him with something.
It is probably something like telling them he didn't send an email/text when they have records showing otherwise, while at the end of the day, whether he sent it or not had no relevance to the case.
So if he had said nothing to the feds this case would be closed.
Yep, whenever a fishing expedition is engaged in by the Feds, they'll always manufacture the whole "lying to federal investigators" B.S., which is absurd considering the Judge just said that there wasn't anything illegal done.
I'm happy for him. As to lying to federal investigators... if its been found legal for federal investigators/police to lie to everybody else, then I think the reverse should be legal as well.
i wonder why everything in the courts has to do with "electricity'.. "circuit" courts... people get "charged" etc
The judge did not rule that he was guilty of lying.