Judge Swamp: McCabe firing could be seen as obstruction of justice

That's what I thought...

I wish the ancaps and minarchists got a long better.
AnCapism was created to scare normals away from the small government end of the pool, some of it's adherents are sincere but they are the ones who always start fights by calling anyone who believes that some government is required "Tyrants".

Judge Swamp is exposing himself fully as controlled opposition which makes him much worse than your typical AnCap.
 
A dedication from the book: “Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom,” by Judge Andrew Napolitano.

This book is dedicated to

Congressman Ron Paul,

Whose intellect, industry, heart, and head

Have educated millions on the

Loss of Liberty because of big government;

And whose personal courage and fearless determination

Have made him a hero

To lovers of Freedom everywhere on the planet,

And a profound personal inspiration to me.
 
If you're bound and determined to suck Trump's dick, then you're going to wind up in that bed too.

Or are you turning a blind eye to who the nominee for State is?

Maybe Judge Swamp should attack Trump for that instead of defending the McCabe wing of the Swamp?
I am critical of Trump's bad actions but he is better than Clinton & Co.
 
Pretty sure Trump promised he would nominate him Supreme Court Justice, so I dunno why you think he would be Trump's enemy. If anything he just has to make it out to be like they have a neutral relationship.

Trump should reconsider that promise, if he wants to look independent of Trump he should follow Rand's lead and attack Trump for the right things.
 
Maybe Judge Swamp should attack Trump for that instead of defending the McCabe wing of the Swamp?
I am critical of Trump's bad actions but he is better than Clinton & Co.

I can name you at least a hundred people who are better than Hillary Clinton, but are nonetheless evil bastards in bed with the CIA.

And Trump is definitely the tip of that iceberg.
 
I can name you at least a hundred people who are better than Hillary Clinton, but are nonetheless evil bastards in bed with the CIA.

And Trump is definitely the tip of that iceberg.

Even if you are right Judge Swamp has joined Clinton & Co. so he is worse than Trump, I shudder to think how he would act if appointed to SCOTUS or any other position of power.
 
Even if you are right Judge Swamp has joined Clinton & Co. so he is worse than Trump, I shudder to think how he would act if appointed to SCOTUS or any other position of power.

Napolitano is part of the Clinton Machine because you dreamed last night that he thinks Putin elected Trump?

Going to share what you smoked last evening?
 



Judge Napolitano is a great guy.

There are now two reason I can think of that he would be doing this, and neither have anything to do with being controlled opposition.

1. He is trying to warn Trump and those around him regarding what their next move might be.

2. He is trying to appear politically neutral so when Trump nominates him as Supreme Court Justice he will have a better shot of getting confirmation from congress.
 
Judge Napolitano is a great guy.

There are now two reason I can think of that he would be doing this, and neither have anything to do with being controlled opposition.

1. He is trying to warn Trump and those around him regarding what their next move might be.
There is no way his comments can be taken that way, he is promoting the idea that Trump did something wrong and should be charged and removed.

2. He is trying to appear politically neutral so when Trump nominates him as Supreme Court Justice he will have a better shot of getting confirmation from congress.
Rand attacks Trump for the things he should be criticized for, if Judge Swamp was doing #2 he would sound like Rand instead of Brennan, Comey, Hitlery & Co.
 
Judge Napolitano is a great guy.

There are now two reason I can think of that he would be doing this, and neither have anything to do with being controlled opposition.

1. He is trying to warn Trump and those around him regarding what their next move might be.

2. He is trying to appear politically neutral so when Trump nominates him as Supreme Court Justice he will have a better shot of getting confirmation from congress.


Also, in addition to that second point - you might recall that there was a lot of chatter a while back that Judge Napolitano got pulled off Fox after making the comment that Obama was wiretapping Trump during his campaign. This was before there was proof of such allegations.

I really think Napolitano is just trying to paint himself as more neutral of the President.
 
Also, in addition to that second point - you might recall that there was a lot of chatter a while back that Judge Napolitano got pulled off Fox after making the comment that Obama was wiretapping Trump during his campaign. This was before there was proof of such allegations.

I really think Napolitano is just trying to paint himself as more neutral of the President.

Maybe that was just an act he and FOX put on to burnish his credentials, either that or he sold out to get his job back.
 
There is no way his comments can be taken that way, he is promoting the idea that Trump did something wrong and should be charged and removed.

Ya I know, you said the same thing about Trump "promoting" gun control. Pretty sure everything that has happened so far with regards to gun control would have happened without Trump's "approval", and I'm also pretty sure that we will not be seeing much if any gun control legislation pass and remain standing after appeals in court.

Rand attacks Trump for the things he should be criticized for, if Judge Swamp was doing #2 he would sound like Rand instead of Brennan, Comey, Hitlery & Co.

I think the Judge is using this as a secret communicative way to talk to Trump and warn him of things without actually making an official phone call.. and also appear more neutral.
 
There was media speculation earlier that such charges will come up after Mueller interviews "free thinking" Trump but looks like they are pushing one out of the two items even before the interview.

This is sort of following Clinton investigation trajectory, investigations started over ABC but final charges were about XYZ.

Clinton-removal-2-newpaper-661x381.jpg
 
QUOTE By... enhanced_deficit

"There was media speculation earlier that such charges will come up after Mueller interviews "free thinking" Trump but looks like they are pushing one out of the two items even before the interview.

This is sort of following Clinton investigation trajectory, investigations started over ABC but final charges were about XYZ."



(Same might be said about the Watergate Committee Hearings. Results can vary. This could go either way for DJT)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top