Judge Napolitano has a question for you - What should libertarians do in November?

jct74

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
14,304
lorettalipsey

They should vote against obama at all cost and a vote for Gary Johnson will be a vote FOR obama. We simply can't let obama have another 4 years to finish destroying this wonderful country of ours.

That comment makes me laugh and cringe at the same time. I ain't the brightest bulb but dang people are so stupid.

 
I'm gonna go to Costco, drink some Brawndo and watch Idiocracy.

1307914804333.jpg
 
As Ron would say, they should do whatever they want.

--
edit, posted this, let them sweat:

people who are libertarian leaning by nature are not collectivist. As with herding cats, it is much better to attract them with something tasty. We don't collectively go somewhere, but we know what we like.

So we'll all do what we want.
 
Last edited:
I can't get it to display or take comments. Tried on Firefox and IE 9
 
I'm not voting for anyone in November. Once again, the country will end up with exactly the kind of crappy leadership they deserve, and far be it for me to stand in their way.
 
It's working for me now:


Be principled and vote Gary Johnson and Judge Jim Gray on the Libertarian ticket. Gary has a proven track record of vetoing spending as NM Governor - he vetoed over 700 pieces of legislation, more than all other governors combined. He is the necessary anti-spend candidate - most people don't know that by 2025 the entire federal budget will be consumed by a combination of entitlements and interest on the debt (and that's an optimistic projection...). There won't be a penny left for the most basic function of the federal government - defense.

Do you think you should vote for the lesser of two evils and vote Romney over Obama? That's a strategy of winning a battle but losing the war. When you vote evil, you convince the powers that be that all they EVER have to offer you is evil b/c they know they'll have your vote. Look what that strategy has gotten you Republicans. Nixon enacted wage and price controls and killed the gold standard. Reagan had great rhetoric but spent like a drunken sailor. Bush Sr. raised taxes. Bob Dole supported Obamacare. Bush Jr. spent like a drunken sailor. McCain voted for the bailout and wanted a stimulus (just not the same one as Obama). Do you honestly think Romney, whose MA advisers actually went on to help craft Obamacare, will be any different? He doesn't even want to repeal it. In his own words he wants to "repeal the bad and keep the good".

And it's ironic, but the greater of two evils - Obama, would actually be preferable to Romney as president. Why? Because when Republicans have one of their own in the White House, they always raise the white flag when it comes to spending and limited government. Why weren't the Republicans hell bent against Bush Care - the expensive prescription drug benefit, when Bush Jr. was in office? If John Kerry had been elected, I guarantee the GOP would have voted it down simply b/c a Democrat was in office. If liberal Obama is elected instead of liberal Romney, at least there will be more deadlock simply because of party politics.
 
Romney with a rubber stamp congress, possibly with a Speaker Cantor would be worse than divided govt.


if Al Gore had won there would be no patriot act. no way would a Republican congress have passed it for him
 
Last edited:
I get pissed off that Fox only brings the Judge out for 'token outreaches' to the libertarian community, anymore. Reminds me of "The Verdict" segment they had years ago, which maybe gave the Judge a minute per week to speak.
 
Back
Top