Judge Napolitano flat-out lies about Ted Cruz on Fox News

[LibertyEagle]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...-from-prominent-libertarian-judge-napolitano/

Sorry spinsters, I was right all along:

Really? Then tell me, then why would someone in the federal government and running for a federal office be advocating for how the states should handle education? Wouldn't he instead be trying to get the federal government out of the picture?

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

His point is that poor kids should not be trapped in public schools. Put the money with the child, not the school. Allow competition in education.
Yes, he is for eliminating the Doe.

A sizable chunk of poor children do not have parents that can afford to send their children to school. They are, in fact, subsidized by wealthier families. How do you propose sending poor children to school without transfers of wealth?

 

[heavenlyboy34]

A sizable chunk of poor children do not have parents that can afford to send their children to school. They are, in fact, subsidized by wealthier families. How do you propose sending poor children to school without transfers of wealth?

Churches and charities are the old-fashioned, tried-and-true way. What's wrong with that?

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

Churches and charities are the old-fashioned, tried-and-true way. What's wrong with that?

Nothing. I'm trying to get Taftfan to see that vouchers for poor children don't solve the problem of wealth transfers.

 

[heavenlyboy34]

Nothing. I'm trying to get Taftfan to see that vouchers for poor children don't solve the problem of wealth transfers.

Natch. Didn't read back that far. Sorry to disrupt your conversation. :o ~hugs~

 

[otherone]

A sizable chunk of poor children do not have parents that can afford to send their children to school. They are, in fact, subsidized by wealthier families. How do you propose sending poor children to school without transfers of wealth?

As an aside, who actually benefits from public education?