John McAfee reveals details on gadget to thwart NSA - Can [he] pull this off?

Lucille

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2007
Messages
15,019
Can John McAfee pull this off?
http://www.backwoodshome.com/blogs/ClaireWolfe/2013/10/02/can-john-mcafee-pull-this-off/

You may have heard that John McAfee (of both anti-virus fame and possibly-shooting-his-neighbor-in-Belize infamy) claims to have plans for an inexpensive, portable device to foil NSA snooping. Says he just needs to get backers & such — that the device itself is already feasible.

It’s called “Decentral” or “Dcentral,” depending on which article you read.

When I expressed doubt that the half-mad McAfee could pull this off, an acquaintance we shall call “Boris Badenov” for his background, replied:
Well, I guarantee it will be a flawed individual who comes up with a “peaceful” solution to the Stasi… and shooting a neighbor on occasion may be necessary to maintain the balance of nature. Coming up with a solution from a flawed man who shoots the occasional neighbor will often times prevent “good” men from lining people up against the wall in haste.

My experience looking at US intelligence estimates from the cold war is that the Stasi and KGB used physical/human intel to much greater affect than we did with our so-called ELINT… and it didn’t matter. Our Stasi/NSA, even twenty years ago, relied primarily on electronic intrusion… and mostly we got it wrong… and it never seems to matter that it’s a huge waste.

If I was in a plot against the totalitarian thugs and their Stasi minions who our are current masters, I would not use the telephone or internet. It’s easy to spoof electronic surveillance, and even easier to “go dark”, which gives the snoopers nothing of value. The two methods were usually combined by the Soviets (The GRU were masters at this), giving us fake electronic traffic to monitor while running the real operation in the ELINT Dark. When they invaded Czecho in 68 they moved about 8 divisions from central Russia without us seeing or hearing a thing. Cut to 91, The less than astute Saddam does the same thing in Kuwait.

The trick for us is going to be able to go dark to their eyes and yet still communicate as we choose. It’s completely doable and I think McAfee is on to something. A bunch of fat, lazy, Cheetos eating Aspies are not liable to gather any usable or accurate information… but they can do a lot of damage for sure. OK, enough! …. I’m full of useless info… maybe I should have worked for the Staso?

One thing’s for sure. If McAfee doesn’t succeed at making and marketing this, somebody will produce something like it. In fact, what do you want to bet that, within five years, the NSA and its equally UnAmerican allies will be shut out of a LOT of online and telephone traffic by measures that, in retrospect, will seem to have been amazingly simple?
 
Gunny, I thought about you when I was posting it!

Speaking of computers, I forgot to tell you and OB that Martin Armstrong is writing a book about his computer! Or should I not even get you started? ;)

Artificial Intelligence – The Coming Revelation
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/07/18/artificial-intelligence-the-coming-revelation/

We have been getting a tremendous number of questions regarding our computer system. Accomplishing truly fully functioning Artificial Intelligence was by no means an easy task. The goal was quite simply to create a system that learns like a human being and builds a knowledge based that is ongoing and perpetual free of all human bias and emotion. This is achieving self-awareness insofar as it is able to adapt and write its own program, yet at the same time, it is one step below becoming self-conscious. A book will be out in 2014 outlining this accomplishment and the implications for the future with such technology.

In this manner, it is creating a knowledge base that we can learn from and never dies. By feeding in everything going on in the world, what emerges is a deep understanding of the true nature of the global economy.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/artificial-intelligence/

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/09/30/update-on-computer-modeling/

http://armstrongeconomics.com/1113-2/
 
Last edited:
Speaking of computers, I forgot to tell you and OB that Martin Armstrong is writing a book about his computer! Or should I not even get you started? ;)

:D

This is achieving self-awareness insofar as it is able to adapt and write its own program, yet at the same time, it is one step below becoming self-conscious.

Well, I can see one very serious problem right off the bat ...

What can it possibly mean to say that "this is achieving self-awareness" but "at the same time" this is "one step below becoming self-conscious."

:confused::confused::confused:

(And the "insofar" qualifer is moot - "self-programming" & adaptational computation is "old hat" in computar science.)
 
Write him a letter and ask him! Can't wait to hear what you think of his book.

He said China wanted his computer, and so did the CIA, and he told them both "No." Then he was arrested and charged for what was essentially manipulating the world economy, and in '99 they put him in prison for seven years for civil contempt of court (one of the longest in history, and the Wise Latina was involved somehow) then he served five for fraud. He got out in '11.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/06/20/self-aware-artificial-intelligence/

QUESTION: You are a legend in programming that you seem not to be aware of. The debate has been did your computer achieve self-consciousness?

ANSWER: No. It achieved self-awareness. It immediately knew the government was trying to take it to its secret computer lab in WTC building 7 that mysterious collapsed even though nothing struck the building. They were angry when they realized it had self-destructed. It was aware of its surroundings and it took all but 7 seconds to self-destruct overwriting all code 7 times and shifting around so they could never un-erase and put him back together again.

The Global Market Watch is running. It is being tested live and seems to have handled these turning points rather well. Reassembling something of this magnitude is truly an awesome project. It is time consuming to say the least. What is at stake is the creation of an artificial being that monitors the world around it. This is beyond creating a mere drone that people control from a distance. This is something that thinks on its own and tells you what it has explored.

It's like that surveillance show on the teevee.
 
Last edited:
It will be interesting to see if anything comes of this. The hardware doesn't need to be too exotic or unusually advanced...just uncompromised by hardware backdoors like Intel's AMT technology (part of vPro...and they're using another marketing term now too for certain capabilities, but I can't remember what). On the software level, we would need communications to use something like the BitMessage protocol by default, particularly the part where endpoints/addresses are actually public key fingerprints (to avoid man-in-the-middle attacks and trusted third parties). An open source OS like Linux or even OpenBSD is a must as well, and mesh networking capabilities would be helpful to bypass Internet shutdowns or device-specific/protocol-specific crackdowns by government-compromised ISP's.

Efficient mesh networking is still mostly in the "research project" stage, and projects like FreedomBox are trying to get it out in the wild, but the hardest part of secure computing/communication is really just getting wide adoption of a.) strong protocols and b.) uncompromised hardware...especially the latter. I don't think there are any good, modern open source processor designs out there (there's the MMIX ISA, but that's not the same thing as an actual hardware design), and the actual manufacturing process relies on such expensive fabrication technologies that various governments (etc.) can easily compromise every single facility capable of production.
 
Last edited:
Why would anyone trust anything by the original developer of the most hated, nefarious, obtuse AV SW on the planet?
 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/10/mac-slavo/the-100-nsa-blocker/
Their tentacles are everywhere.

If it’s plugged into the internet there is a near 100% chance that the National Security Agency is monitoring it.

So how does the average American get off the control grid?

According to well known anti-virus software founder John McAfee the answer is simple.

Decentralization.

Rather than connecting to the telecom sponsored (and government integrated) internet, we bypass it completely and connect directly to each other’s devices in a peer-to-peer environment using what is essentially a distributed network architecture.

He’s been working on the new device, dubbed D-Central, for several years but has recently sped up its development in light of revelations that the NSA is tapping the digital interactions and personal correspondence of virtually every American citizen.

The new “NSA Killer” will, according to McAfee, make it difficult if not impossible for the NSA to tap into personal communications like they do today because the device would operate in what is known as a “dark web” and allow an individual to completely obscure their identity.

McAfee says with D-Central there will be no way for the government to tell, “who you are or where you are.”...

http://www.backwoodshome.com/blogs/ClaireWolfe/2013/10/03/two-for-laughing-at-the-snoopazoids/

Non-Sequitur_130929.jpg
 
Back
Top