Jobless mother-of-11 who has never worked gets a $760k luxury home

Last edited:
Lovely.

What's worse is she gets in the newspaper and becomes a celebrity because of it.
 
I'm not really saying that a good use of taxpayer dollars, but it's not the WORST use. I mean, between boobies and bombs, I'd down with boobies.

Cant disagree with that. If someone proposed a bill in which the DoD budget were slashed by 50% with half of the savings going towards free boob jobs to every woman in America who wanted one, I'd support that bill.
 
All a child needs food on the table,roof over their heads and moral guidence with some real education. Not 3/4 million dollar homes, but I might be wrong so if anyone proves expensive homes is what kids need then I change my mind. That home seems more luxorius then what is necessary.

I grew up in a house that was probably 1100 sf, not including the half basement. The family up the street had the same floorplan, and 11 kids. Never went in their house, so not sure how they divvied up all that space, but there was no way it could possibly be comfortable.

Most of them went to college, none went to jail, and they all went on to live relatively normal lives. The cramped life must have been difficult but it didn't seem to damage them much.
 
Cant disagree with that. If someone proposed a bill in which the DoD budget were slashed by 50% with half of the savings going towards free boob jobs to every woman in America who wanted one, I'd support that bill.

The anti-war movement should get on board. "Boobies not Bombs!" has a certain ring to it. And it would get the much-coveted flat-chested female vote.
 
The anti-war movement should get on board. "Boobies not Bombs!" has a certain ring to it. And it would get the much-coveted flat-chested female vote.

you might not believe this but there are lots of women who happily choose not to have breast enlargements. and it's kind of insulting to insinuate that they should.
 
you might not believe this but there are lots of women who happily choose not to have breast enlargements. and it's kind of insulting to insinuate that they should.

Lighten up Angela, it was a joke. Don't go all feminist on us.
 
you might not believe this but there are lots of women who happily choose not to have breast enlargements. and it's kind of insulting to insinuate that they should.

I love women with small boobs. In my book, boobs start at 'good' and go up from there. However, it's not generally the well-endowed chicks that get boob enlargements. Usually if anything they get them reduced. So I'll amend my argument to include enhancements, reductions and 'touch-ups' for those women who feel they have just the rights size. In short, "a perfect boob in every blouse", to paraphrase a famous campaign slogan....
 
UK has Welfare Queen... US has Ocotomom... move on.

Wonder when welfare queen is going to do porn.
 
Did you look at the picture? Ever live in California? $750K is a 2 bedroom, if you are lucky-

The fed couldn't print enough money to get me to live in the hellhole that is California. $750k here in my town is 4000 sf oceanfront and just about the most expensive house in town. Most of them in that price range are rich masshole's summer homes.
 
I love women with small boobs. In my book, boobs start at 'good' and go up from there. However, it's not generally the well-endowed chicks that get boob enlargements. Usually if anything they get them reduced. So I'll amend my argument to include enhancements, reductions and 'touch-ups' for those women who feel they have just the rights size. In short, "a perfect boob in every blouse", to paraphrase a famous campaign slogan....

Just one? I would not doubt it, what with the Government involved :(

You might add "even-out" jobs to that list, btw, for our lop-sided American ladies, and moob-reductions for the fellas.
 
Back
Top