Jobless mother-of-11 who has never worked gets a $760k luxury home

She probably hopes one or two of the kids does well in life and funds her retirement. Odds are they will.

It looks like the taxpayer has already funded her retirement, since she's never worked a day in her life, apparently. This is despicable.
 
Hm.... getting payed for having sex....Interesting...so many possibilities... I dont know but sounds familiar (and not in family kind of way familiar)...

You actually make a very real point. She is, in essence, being a prostitute to government while leaving the paying public at large with blue balls.
 
Don't hate the player, hate the game. Wow, I can't begin to tell you how much I hate the welfare game. By welfare, I mean both corporate and social ones

Agreed. It is also amazing to have all the anti-abortionists calling this woman a whore.

The house isn't a mansion but it is serviceable and I am sure it is good for the kids.

I don't pretend to know her circumstances so I will not judge her- at least she kept her kids. Maybe one of them will turn out to be a Beethoven, Einstein, or a Steve Jobs.
 
Agreed. It is also amazing to have all the anti-abortionists calling this woman a whore.

The house isn't a mansion but it is serviceable and I am sure it is good for the kids.

I don't pretend to know her circumstances so I will not judge her- at least she kept her kids. Maybe one of them will turn out to be a Beethoven, Einstein, or a Steve Jobs.
Okay lets wait untill we know her if anyone of us happens to know here till we judge, atleast she is not a cold blooded murder like many women would rather be.

Edit: I meant abortion when saying cold blooded murder if anyone reading this would not understand what I meant.
 
Last edited:
This lady doesn't really need a house, she needs a cot. With that many kids, it's not like she spends a whole lot of time off her back....
 
Agreed. It is also amazing to have all the anti-abortionists calling this woman a whore.

The house isn't a mansion but it is serviceable and I am sure it is good for the kids.

I don't pretend to know her circumstances so I will not judge her- at least she kept her kids. Maybe one of them will turn out to be a Beethoven, Einstein, or a Steve Jobs.

i think "once a life is started, give it a future" and "start as many lives as possible solely for welfare purposes" are two different things.. without starting another debate thread
 
Back in the 1980's Newt suggested Boys Towns as a way for the state to provide for the children, while forcing the adults to care for themselves. Looking back, perhaps he was on to something.
 
Absolutely.

When I first bought my house my tenant was a 19 year old with exactly this plan. Already had a 2 year old. Didn't work then had another baby shortly after with a 2nd guy.

She'll prob end up with 8, 6 diff dads and all at the expense of my working day.

Don't be foolish. This was exactly her plan in life.
 
i think "once a life is started, give it a future" and "start as many lives as possible solely for welfare purposes" are two different things.. without starting another debate thread

I believe that raising kids is much harder than working a nine-five; I also believe that a mom is best when she can be home most of the time.

I am not in favor of state welfare but I believe that at this stage of the game, this is a good thing for the kids. They will have a better chance of growing up into responsible people than of being ghetto rats.

I know some welfare moms and none of them started out wanting to have tons of kids and live off of the state- they just want to feed their kids. Also- once on the dole, it is extremely hard to get off. I have seen moms threatened with the taking of their kids etc if they tried.
 
Bunch of fuckin' excuses..:mad:

The federal government has no business paying breeders.

Doesn't matter EU or USA.

If locals want to foot the bill for breeders then fine.
 
Don't hate the player, hate the game. Wow, I can't begin to tell you how much I hate the welfare game. By welfare, I mean both corporate and social ones

If you're going to hate, I say go all the way and hate them both!

:)
 
I am not in favor of state welfare but I believe that at this stage of the game, this is a good thing for the kids. They will have a better chance of growing up into responsible people than of being ghetto rats.


I'm not sure you quite grasp how this all works.

I know some welfare moms and none of them started out wanting to have tons of kids and live off of the state- they just want to feed their kids. Also- once on the dole, it is extremely hard to get off. I have seen moms threatened with the taking of their kids etc if they tried.

Sounds like a raft of excuses.
 
Bunch of fuckin' excuses..:mad:

The federal government has no business paying breeders.

Doesn't matter EU or USA.

If locals want to foot the bill for breeders then fine.

Never been a single mom, I see. ;)

For you men that are calling welfare moms "whores" and "breeders", please assure me that you have never had illicit sex with any woman- ever- and that you know of an absolute surety that you have no bastard child somewhere. It takes two to make a baby and men are as much to blame.

These kids need a chance and they have one- I say bravo!

I absolutely agree that this should be taken care of locally and that Fed welfare is a sham. HOWEVER- that ain't the way it is played at the moment. If you want change, then do something about it.
 
Last edited:
The house isn't a mansion but it is serviceable and I am sure it is good for the kids.

Serviceable? It's a 3/4 of a million dollar home. I don't know where you live, but around here we just about call that a mansion and you need to be very well off to own it. Average home price here is $150k or so.
 
Back
Top