Jesse Benton, Dimitri Kesari, and John Tate have been convicted

Yeah they probably shouldn't have done it
Oh, what a bold, courageous denouncement of corruption, Mr. Collins. What a strong stand you have against corruption and deceit. Remind me to make you head of the Ethics Committee.

You picked the wrong friends, Collins. You picked the wrong friends. These guys were, and are, bad news. They're slimy. You knew that. Everybody knew that. Everybody who ever worked with them knew that. And you are very much tarnished by your association with and defense of them.
 
Oh, what a bold, courageous denouncement of corruption, Mr. Collins. What a strong stand you have against corruption and deceit. Remind me to make you head of the Ethics Committee.

You picked the wrong friends, Collins. You picked the wrong friends. These guys were, and are, bad news. They're slimy. You knew that. Everybody knew that. Everybody who ever worked with them knew that. And you are very much tarnished by your association with and defense of them.
No, I had no idea about any of this until it was public actually. In fact they were very adamant about following FEC rules and not deviating from them. As I said they shouldn't have done this, but the law they were convicted under is unconstitutional.
 
Oh, what a bold, courageous denouncement of corruption, Mr. Collins. What a strong stand you have against corruption and deceit. Remind me to make you head of the Ethics Committee.

You picked the wrong friends, Collins. You picked the wrong friends. These guys were, and are, bad news. They're slimy. You knew that. Everybody knew that. Everybody who ever worked with them knew that. And you are very much tarnished by your association with and defense of them.

Oh, I'm sure the way he's wandering around Ron Paul Forums lobbing bricks at Ron Paul for giving Republicans lukewarm endorsements is also taking the shine off...
 
Well, if Benton gets any prison time, I just hope Collins is allowed to have conjugal visits.
 
Leave it to the professionals, they said.

You grassroots kooks are making us look bad, they said.

Endorsements are meaningless, shut up and sit down, they said.
 
No, read what I wrote. I said that they are guilty under the law. The law now considers them guilty whether they perpetrated the act or not.

Pffft...the law is an ass.

And what law?

I would bet a month's pay that no law was broken, a law in the sense that a bill was presented to Congress, voted on and approved, sent to the Senate, voted and approved and then signed by a President.

No, what I bet they are going to jail for is noncompliance with a government fatwa, a dictate decreed by the FEC.

Issued in a dictatorship
 
Last edited:
Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, May 5, 2016



[h=1]Three Members of 2012 Presidential Campaign Staff Guilty of Concealing Campaign Expenditures to State Senator[/h] Three members of a 2012 presidential campaign committee were convicted by a federal jury in Des Moines, Iowa, on all counts of an indictment charging the concealment of campaign expenditures made to secure the endorsement of an Iowa State Senator.
Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and Assistant Director in Charge Paul M. Abbate of the FBI’s Washington Field Office made the announcement.
“Concealing and falsely reporting campaign expenditures undermines the integrity and transparency of the federal election process,” said Assistant Attorney General Caldwell. “When political operatives secretly buy an elected official’s political support, it undermines public confidence in our entire political system.”
“Violating campaign finance transparency laws by falsifying expenditure records and reports deceives the public and facilitates corruption,” said Assistant Director in Charge Abbate. “The FBI will aggressively investigate those who corrupt the integrity of our democratic process. I want to thank the special agents, analysts and prosecutors who worked diligently to see this case through to today’s result.”
Jesse R. Benton, 38, of Louisville, Kentucky, and John M. Tate, 53, of Warrenton, Virginia,

were convicted of conspiracy,
causing false records to obstruct a contemplated investigation,
causing the submission of false campaign expenditure reports to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and
engaging in a scheme to make false statements to the FEC.


Dimitrios N. Kesari, 50, of Leesburg, Virginia, was convicted of the same offenses, except causing false campaign expenditure reports, for which he was previously convicted by a jury in a separate trial in October 2015.

Chief Judge John A. Jarvey of the Southern District of Iowa noted that he would schedule sentencing for a later date.
The defendants were the senior leadership of a campaign for a candidate in the 2012 presidential election. According to the indictment, former Iowa State Senator Kent Sorenson initially supported one candidate in the 2012 presidential election, but between October and December 2011, negotiated with the defendants to switch his support to their candidate in exchange for money. On December 28, 2011, at a political event in Des Moines, Iowa, Sorenson publicly announced his switch of support.
Evidence at trial proved that the campaign expenditures to Sorenson were made in monthly installments of approximately $8,000 each and ultimately amounted to over $70,000. The defendants concealed the payments by causing them to be recorded – both in campaign accounting records and in FEC filings – as campaign-related audio-visual expenditures, and by causing them to be transmitted to a film production company and then to a second company that was controlled by Sorenson. The conspirators concealed their campaign’s payments to Sorenson from their candidate and also from the FEC, the FBI, and the public.
Trial evidence showed that in response to criticism of Sorenson’s change of support from one candidate to the other, the conspirators arranged for Sorenson to issue public statements denying allegations that he was offered money for his endorsement and noting that the campaign committee’s FEC filings would show that it made no payments to Sorenson.
On August 27, 2014, Sorenson pled guilty to causing a campaign committee to falsely report its expenditures to the FEC and to obstruction of justice. He has not yet been sentenced.
The case is being investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office, with assistance from the Omaha, Nebraska, Field Office and the Des Moines Resident Agency. The case is being prosecuted by Director Richard C. Pilger of the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section’s Election Crimes Branch, Deputy Chief J.P. Cooney, and Trial Attorney Jonathan I. Kravis.



16-537


Criminal Division



Updated May 5, 2016
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/thre...guilty-concealing-campaign-expenditures-state
 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally



(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
 
I received a rep comment on my above post that states that it was IA law they were convicted under.

But then I read this in the OP:

Benton, Tate and Kesari all left the federal courthouse in Des Moines

Federal jurors returned guilty verdicts Thursday

I'm left to ask, what "law" was violated, and if it was state law, why are the fedcoats prosecuting it?

ETA - In regard to presence's post: the OP also says they were acquitted of the Sec 1001 charges.
 
Last edited:
Leave it to the professionals, they said.

You grassroots kooks are making us look bad, they said.

Endorsements are meaningless, shut up and sit down, they said.

What the heck is your point, AF? That throwing snowballs at the media, or doing wholesale mailouts to Republican voters that linked to "911 was an inside job" videos, would somehow have won the day?
 
Oh, I'm sure the way he's wandering around Ron Paul Forums lobbing bricks at Ron Paul for giving Republicans lukewarm endorsements is also taking the shine off...

What I have seen him do is to remind people that RP also made some not-so-great endorsements, when some here are attacking other individuals for doing same. It seems that people don't want to be reminded of that fact.
 
ab8iK8r.png



18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)





prev | next
If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.
18 U.S. Code § 2 - Principals

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)





prev | next
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.

(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a
principal.


18 U.S. Code § 1519 - Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)





prev | next
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 107–204, title VIII, § 802(a), July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 800.)

18 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
TITLE 18 - APPENDIX
FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
TITLE IX. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Rule 52 - Harmless and Plain Error
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

Rule 52. Harmless and Plain Error

(a) Harmless Error. Any error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect substantial rights must be disregarded.
(b) Plain Error. A plain error that affects substantial rights may be considered even though it was not brought to the court's attention.
(As amended Apr. 29, 2002, eff. Dec. 1, 2002.)



https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally



(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
 
Last edited:
What the heck is your point, AF? That throwing snowballs at the media, or doing wholesale mailouts to Republican voters that linked to "911 was an inside job" videos, would somehow have won the day?

My point is the same that I have been making for years now.

The "professionals" thought the grassroots were a bunch of kooks and an embarrassment.

They made it clear that they neither wanted nor needed our "help", starting in 2012 and running right through to 2016 (but they'll take our money, thank you very much).

That discouraged and "disenfranchised" the loose but vibrant coalition we had assembled starting in 2007.

So much so that there was no energy at all in 2016.

And the result was a failed Paul campaign that was over before NH.
 
Back
Top