Jerusalem Post: We need Regime Change war vs. Iran

Snowball

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
5,239

#1 rated Op-Ed

"The vile and detested institution of Shi’ite clerical rule has turned a country with 5,500 years of civilization and history into a wasteland. A stubborn, arrogant, and deluded mullah – who has ruled for 36 years following the death of the ruthless Khomeini – has taken 86 million Iranians hostage and blocked every avenue for progress, reform, or hope.

This cowardly and malevolent cleric or Shi’ite mullah, a true believer in Islamic terrorism, has darkened the lives of the Iranian people. He dismisses peace and coexistence as humiliation, yet his very existence is a mark of disgrace and misery for the nation."
---
"Merely targeting nuclear facilities, missile depots, drone arsenals, and terrorist training camps is insufficient."
 
For a while now I thought it might come from the inside through a political revolution.

The protests they have had for political change in Iran recently were crazy. Especially with their fashion police killing women.
 
Let's start two dozen threads with Israel in the title and see if we can make it blow a circuit.
 
The bombers in Diego Garcia and American naval positioning is meant to intimidate Iran, and just in case Iran has any thoughts about responding to strikes vs. Yemen (which they won't), or Israel as it ramps up the Gaza extirpation campaign. They are also going to stay in striking range because the bigger picture is that the US, in a new objective, wants Iran to dismantle its entire nuclear program.

To be honest about it, I've always perceived their nuclear program as odd. Whether one accepts the argument that it's for peaceful energy or isotope research and medical use or not, one cannot escape the characteristic that it has provided Israel and the US (and previously, the Saudis) with a fistful of talleyrands to raise up and scream: "Look! They are building a nuclear weapon!"

Now, one might wonder why a country like Iran which has vast oil reserves which are fully developed and exploited, and will last for probable centuries might want to build a nuclear energy program? They had maintained it was so they would not use their own oil and could export it, and play up the medical applcations (which, to be frank, are fringey) - did their contention ever really make sense?

It is not hard to imagine why many have maintained that it doesn't make sense, and that Iran could do very well without a nuclear program at all.
Ergo, perhaps Iran's NP is to produce nuclear weapons, regardless of the Fatwah. So, we arrive at this point. What's new is that Iran's ability to militarily affect the entire region is on the wane, and in a big way.

There is a difference of opinion in the commentator world about whether Iran should quit its NP or not. I would strongly advise them to do so. The alternative would be horrific for them. Trump is going along with the Israeli determination to put an end to it (the NP), and although the Israelis and Trump would love to see the theocratic government of Iran overthrown completely, they would go along with a divestiture of the NP instead.

Ultimately, regime change is the long-term goal, but if Iran were more creative diplomatically, they could wiggle around it and perhaps convince the Israelis and the US to forego a color-revolution or black op contrived for coup d'etat.

Over the coming weeks, this is the dilemma Iran faces. It is different than before, because they are facing an elevated demand, not satisfied with inspections -- but demanding a full abandonment.

If they choose poorly, they will lose not only the NP but their own energy infrastructure, and face instabilities internally which they've never encountered before. I can certainly see Russia and China talking them into it. If they do this, they can avoid war.
 
The bombers in Diego Garcia and American naval positioning is meant to intimidate Iran

Now, one might wonder why a country like Iran which has vast oil reserves which are fully developed and exploited, and will last for probable centuries might want to build a nuclear energy program?
Trump gave them a 2 month deadline. Now we are seeing a military buildup in Diego Garcia.

We had similarly given a deadline, with a significant military buildup over several months prior to Desert Storm.




 
I really don't see us openly attacking
Iran, but I do see a maximum pressure campaign.
 
Shit, I just learned the James Angelton was not only the chief of counterintelligence, but head of Israel desk.

No wonder USS Liberty was covered up so masterfully
 
Shit, I just learned the James Angelton was not only the chief of counterintelligence, but head of Israel desk.

Now there's a dual assignment that just screams conflict of interest.

How do they have the chutzpah to call themselves an intelligence agency after doing something that stupid?
 
Last edited:
Atleast if something does happen to Iran they were warned not to create a nuclear program by almost half of the US Senate.

On March 9, 2015, Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) wrote a letter to Iran's leadership, warning them about signing a nuclear deal with Obama

"The next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time."

The letter was signed by 47 Senators.
 
Shit, I just learned the James Angelton was not only the chief of counterintelligence, but head of Israel desk.

No wonder USS Liberty was covered up so masterfully

Angleton was a straight fucking Zionist.

A big part of the reason why Izrael got nukes via usurping his own POTUS.
 
For a while now I thought it might come from the inside through a political revolution.

The protests they have had for political change in Iran recently were crazy. Especially with their fashion police killing women.

Their protests seemed tame compared to BLM.
 
Angleton was a straight fucking Zionist.

A big part of the reason why Izrael got nukes via usurping his own POTUS.

In one of his shows on Judging Freedom this week, Ray McGovern who worked for the CIA while Angleton was still there said that all his reports which mentioned Israel in any way, even in passing, had to go straight to Angleton's desk before they were even documented.
 
In one of his shows on Judging Freedom this week, Ray McGovern who worked for the CIA while Angleton was still there said that all his reports which mentioned Israel in any way, even in passing, had to go straight to Angleton's desk before they were even documented.

Now we know how the monster was fed for so long
 
Back
Top