James O’Keefe Placed on Paid Leave from Project Veritas, to be removed from board

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
118,672
James O’Keefe Placed on Paid Leave from Project Veritas, to be removed from board

Report: James O’Keefe Placed on Paid Leave from Project Veritas

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/report-james-okeefe-placed-paid-leave-project-veritas/

By Jim Hoft
Published February 8, 2023 at 9:16pm

On Wednesday New York Magazine reported that James O’Keefe was placed on paid leave from Project Veritas and will be taking a few weeks of “well-deserved PTO.”

The Gateway Pundit reached out to James for comment.

We will post any updates when we hear back from our sources.

UPDATE: We spoke with a Project Veritas source and we are waiting to report more.




NY Mag reported:

James O’Keefe, the founder and chairman of Project Veritas, has taken a paid leave from the conservative nonprofit media organization as its board considers whether to remove him from his leadership position, according to current and former employees of the organization.

An internal message sent to Project Veritas employees by the organization’s executive director, Daniel Strack, said that O’Keefe would be taking “a few weeks of well-deserved PTO.” An image of the message was shared by a source familiar with the organization’s internal operations, and its authenticity was confirmed by a current employee. When reached for comment on his personal cell phone, O’Keefe said nothing in response and did not respond to follow-up calls and text messages. Through a Project Veritas spokesman, Strack later released a statement on behalf of the organization. “Like all newsrooms at this stage, the Project Veritas Board of Directors and Management are constantly evaluating what the best path forward is for the organization,” the statement read in part. It did not directly address questions about O’Keefe’s employment status. “There are 65+ employees at Project Veritas dedicated to continuing the mission to expose corruption, dishonesty, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions,” the statement read. “To our supporters: We hear you, we care about you, and we will never give up.”

O’Keefe is his organization’s guiding ideological force and onscreen face, but his status as its day-to-day manager has become uncertain amid reports of internal turmoil, lawsuits from former employees, leaks about its internal workings, and a federal investigation into its conduct in purchasing a diary stolen from Ashley Biden, the president’s daughter. Strack’s internal message to employees made reference to what he called “a distracting time” and said that a board meeting had been held to discuss “the health of the organization” and that while “we have not come up with final solutions yet we have made a few immediate decisions.” The message said two top Project Veritas executives, including the nonprofit’s chief financial officer, had been “reinstated.” Multiple sources said that the pair had recently been fired by O’Keefe.

A meeting of the Project Veritas board is scheduled for Friday, when O’Keefe’s potential removal is set to be discussed, according to one source familiar with the matter.
 
Paid leave not too bad

Believe they have over 60 employees. Let’s hope they keep on keeping it on
 
This could actually be good for O'Keefe. Unlike Alex Jones, it seems that O'Keefe answers to a higher authority so when SHTF he is just an employee acting under authority of the board and his superiors.
 
The Glenn Greenwald of Project Veritas. He makes them what they are and then the censor and silence him. Start another company and they do it again. My guess is James O'Keefe has plenty of $$ and would just fade away and retire instead of keep on keeping on.
 
The Glenn Greenwald of Project Veritas. He makes them what they are and then the censor and silence him. Start another company and they do it again. My guess is James O'Keefe has plenty of $$ and would just fade away and retire instead of keep on keeping on.

I wonder if this isn't more likely.

Speaking of Glenn Greenwald, wouldn't that be a great pair if those two teamed up? I know hidden-cameras aren't really Glenn's style but a duo like that with a passion for getting the truth out would be stellar.

That or they were threatened with lawsuits from Pfizer. Liberals are really good at using lawsuits to shut people up.

"health of the organization" excuse is bull***t because stories like the Pfizer one blew the lid off. When youtube starts taking down your videos you know you're doing something right.

PV youtube videos getting about one comment every 30-60 seconds with people outraged by this decision, as I type this.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if this isn't more likely.

Speaking of Glenn Greenwald, wouldn't that be a great pair if those two teamed up? I know hidden-cameras aren't really Glenn's style but a duo like that with a passion for getting the truth out would be stellar.

That or they were threatened with lawsuits from Pfizer. Liberals are really good at using lawsuits to shut people up.

"health of the organization" excuse is bull***t because stories like the Pfizer one blew the lid off. When youtube starts taking down your videos you know you're doing something right.

PV youtube videos getting about one comment every 30-60 seconds with people outraged by this decision, as I type this.
The silver lining for O'Keefe is he was not or is not in charge. He answers to a higher authority one that can force him to take leave.
 
I am guessing that back in the day James O'Keefe started his endeavor and then wanted it to be bigger and better but didn't have the financial wherewithal to do it without investors or partners. Once you have a financier, you are beholden to them.
 
James O'Keefe Accused of 'Erratic Behavior' by 16 Project Veritas Employees
'James has become a power drunk tyrant,' said one unnamed employee in a letter submitted to the organization's board
https://timcast.com/news/james-okeefe-accused-of-erratic-behavior-by-16-project-veritas-employees/
Hannah Claire Brimelow (09 February 2023)

A group of 16 Project Veritas employees asked the non-profit’s board of directors to remove founder James O’Keefe in a letter exposing internal tensions within the organization.

The group claims O’Keefe’s management style and business operations are “antithetical” to the organization’s core values.

Timcast obtained a copy of the letter sent to the Project Veritas Board of Directors, Project Veritas Action and the organization’s executive management. The 11-page document included anonymous reports from witnesses and second-hand accounts of a “pattern of behavior” that “severely limit” the staff’s “ability to execute the PV mission.”
In a preface to the letter, the signatories note about one-third of Project Veritas were involved in the effort to oust O’Keefe and even fewer had signed the letter.

“Some signatories have not been the subject of abuse nor witnessed any abuse but found the corroborated behavior troubling and were willing to sign,” the preface added.

The group’s letter was ostensibly instigated after O’Keefe allegedly publicly berated Chief Strategy Officer Barry Hinckley and Chief Financial Officer Tom O’Hara on Jan. 31. Hinckley and O’Hara were terminated on Jan. 2.

In a text included in the letter, Hinckley told staff members he “stood up to a bully and was fired.”

“James has become a power drunk tyrant and he is exactly who he pontificates on who we should be exposing,” according to one of the group’s 20 collected statements. None of the statements are attributed to specific, named people. The authors noted their evidence was compiled in the two days before the letter was submitted.

“We have all been on the receiving end of unnecessary, seemingly intentionally humiliating, and outright cruel behavior,” said another. “I believe James knows he’s in over his head, he’s scared, overworked, manic on stress and drunk on the success of the last two weeks. His flaws aside, his aims are genuine and he is a true leader. He just needs a push back in the right direction. I hope this potential board action is that push.”

O’Keefe has been accused of calling an employee who is no longer with Project Veritas a “pussy” and labeling another “traitorous.” Some of the statements accuse O’Keefe of “diva” behavior and egomania.

“At Democracy Partners trial, in public, I was yelled at in front of jurors because he was hungry and then he took the 8-month pregnant woman’s sandwich,” one anonymous employee said.

“Everyone is operating in fear because James is erratic,” said another. “One doesn’t know whether one will meet his needs and expectations, since the target is constantly moving, and priorities are shifting.”

News that O’Keefe had been placed on paid leave by the board broke on Feb. 8.

“Like all newsrooms at this stage, the Project Veritas Board of Directors and Management are constantly evaluating what the best path forward is for the organization,” executive director Daniel Strack said in a statement, per New York Magazine. “There are 65+ employees at Project Veritas dedicated to continuing the mission to expose corruption, dishonesty, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions.”

Strack sent an internal message saying its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman was taking “a few weeks of well-deserved PTO.”

The letter’s signatories have demanded that the board stop O’Keefe’s “bullying,” “micromanaging,” and “undermining.” They have also asked that “controls are implemented to execute on the above without fear of personal reprisal.”

“We are writing this because we value the organization that James has built and what we’ve become. No one else is doing the work of PV, and we love it,” the signatories wrote. “If we DON’T make these changes, we will fail to attract and retain the best people. … Continue down the path we are on, and you will have an Army of ‘yes men’ who wouldn’t dare pen this letter.”

Members of five departments signed the letter including Michael Villani, Eric Spracklen, Bethany Ronaldo, Gillian Pietrowski, Jonathan Bailey, Joanne Sumner, and journalists Bobby Harr (Lithium), Arden Young, and Preston Scagnelli.

Project Veritas will reportedly decide at a meeting on Feb. 10 if it will permanently remove its founder.

In response to O’Keefe’s removal, a number of pundits and media figures, including Candace Owens, Paul Joseph Watson, and Jack Posobiec [and Darren J. Beattie], have voiced their support for the non-profit’s founder.

O’Keefe founded Project Veritas in June of 2010. The organization has published investigations and undercover reports on social media platforms, presidential campaigns, and news networks.
 
Wouldn't be a bad thing to have a few more project veritas type orgs

Might need more numbers to take on mighty pharm world
 
Fuch that. I wouldn't go back. Employees going to allow you back so long as....I would get ahead of it and make the announcement prior to their decision.
 
I'm wondering how many of the PV's newer staff thought it was gonna be some sort of twitter-esque Latte-sipping Yoga-break-taking type of job. (These younger folks, I tell ya what)

Anyway, I'd like to hear O'Keefe make a statement personally. I guess he is waiting to see what the board's decision will be tomorrow.

As one youtube commenter put it:

"I can see O'Keefe getting some guys to go back into Project Veritas undercover and finding out who is on the take."

—Which would be hilarious.
 
$#@! with Pfizer and Pfizer will $#@! you back

BRING IT ON

snake-strike.gif


Option #1: O'Keefe has real Kompromat in his background that we don't know about and he played the role he was told to play. When the time was right, the plan was to "publicly yet privately" fire him in order to crater Project Veritas and chill anyone else with the same kind of ideas.

Option #2 (seems more likely to me): O'Keefe made himself a target and so they're dropping the bomb on him using the well-known Swamp playbook.

I don't know which it is, but I do know that, whichever it is, DC is the Swamp and they are the real problem!
 
It sounds like O’Keefe gave up too much power. A big mistake. And now a minority of disgruntled employees have staged a coup.
 
Back
Top