ronpaulitician
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2007
- Messages
- 2,942
James Fallows: "What makes Ron Paul's presence on the debate stage so galvanizing..."
linkie
Also, from the same article:
linkie
What makes Ron Paul's presence on the debate stage so galvanizing -- in human and dramatic terms, entirely apart from his policies -- is the apparent absence of any "how will this go over???" filter between his brain and his mouth. You ask him if he thinks Newt Gingrich -- standing a few feet from him -- is a "chickenhawk," and he'll say, Yes, I hate people who didn't serve but want to start wars. Ask him if he thinks the other politicians are "corrupt," and he'll say, Yes these guys over here, they are. With any normal politician and indeed most normal people, you see an endless calibration and hedging exercise going on: remarks are tailored to local biases and sensibilities, to real people within physical proximity (remember Tim Pawlenty not wanting to criticize Romney to his face?), to "proper" sentiments, and so on. But with Ron Paul, you ask a question, and you're going to get an answer to that exact question, not to some other point he wants to get on the record.
Also, from the same article:
Impressive "you're no Jack Kennedy"-style moment by Ron Paul vs Gingrich last night. ("When I was drafted, I was married and I had two kids, and I went." Background: Gingrich's saying that he wasn't eligible for the Vietnam draft because he had a wife and kids.) Reminder: debates almost never matter because of the differences of policy they expose. They mainly count in giving us an impression of the candidates as people, including how they react to surprises and under stress. Those impressions, pro and con, mainly register though moments like these.