Jack Hunter speaks truth.....

Entirely irrelevant, and I haven't said anything about Ron Paul believing 9/11 was an inside job. Any other strawmen you'd like to erect?

I figured I deserved building your strawman since you built many tonight. You're an agent of change who does nothing to change it. Basically, you're from the "Mother In-Law" wing of the liberty movement. "He's not good enough for my daughter."
 
I figured I deserved building your strawman since you built many tonight. You're an agent of change who does nothing to change it. Basically, you're from the "Mother In-Law" wing of the liberty movement. "He's not good enough for my daughter."

Right. I've been asking people about Goldwater because moderation and incrementalism brought us nothing. Worse than nothing, it accelerated the decline of the country. Being critical of moderation and incrementalism in response to those advocating moderation and incrementalism is hardly building strawmen.
 
Last edited:
Right. I've been asking people about Goldwater because moderation and incrementalism brought us nothing. Worse than nothing, it accelerated the decline of the country. Being critical of moderation and incrementalism in response to those advocating moderation and incrementalism is hardly building strawmen.

Actually, you are looking at it backward. The establishment (which is what Reagan was) wanted to win so they went to the demands of the fringe socialcons. We're the role of the social cons now. Then again, that would ruin your narrative.
 
Actually, you are looking at it backward. The establishment (which is what Reagan was) wanted to win so they went to the demands of the fringe socialcons. We're the role of the social cons now. Then again, that would ruin your narrative.

Oh, so I guess Gerald Ford was the GOP outsider in 1976, as was H.W. Bush in 1980. I'm so silly.
 
Oh, so I guess Gerald Ford was the GOP outsider in 1976, as was H.W. Bush in 1980. I'm so silly.

You do know there are more than 2 sides, right? It's not all black and white. There are some blues and reds. See, it's simple to see a world with only two philosophies.
 
I don't think endorsing Mitt was the best play for Rand. He could have not endorsed anyone and it wouldn't have mattered. He seriously blew it with his fathers base today. I hope the establishment plans on taking care of him because he won't get one red cent of mine in the future. I supported Ron because he would have never compromised and supported Mitt. Ron has talked extensively about compromise and how it's no good. Rand just lost my support. This is political pandering and I won't have any of it. Between his "compromise" with Iran sanctions and this I've had enough. Sanctions are an act of war and it goes against everything that I stand for.

I understand that this is not about Ron or Rand. This about standing up to the system and telling them to go to hell but when some of our best allies on capital hill roll over and shit on you well you have to wonder what the point is. Good luck to Rand. I hope playing house with the Stepford wives works out for him.

Justin Amash 2016! FTW!!!
 
Thank you Jack Hunter for some much needed rationality and realism around here.
Hear, Hear!

Anyone attacking Rand Paul is either:

  • Deaf and did not hear Rand when he stated numerous times on national television he would support whomever the eventual nominee is.
  • A hater trying to divide the liberty movement with any wedge they can find.
  • Lost their grasp of reality
 
I figured I deserved building your strawman since you built many tonight. You're an agent of change who does nothing to change it. Basically, you're from the "Mother In-Law" wing of the liberty movement. "He's not good enough for my daughter."
So true lol :D
 
Back
Top