J.C. Watts "struggling" whether to support Trump

I've been a Ron Paul Supporter since 2007 and this tastes awesome. Even if this is all talk, it's the right talk. Remember, ideas are more powerful than any army or any government. (I wonder who said that?) :rolleyes:


How does this taste?





 
Enlighten me. Are Trump supporters believers that what he says is merely convenient politicking? That perhaps he is a pretender, a person who despite decades of evidence to the contrary really stands for the values of liberty-minded voters? That She-who-must-not-be-named, Mrs. Establishment is a worse option and that he is really a government minimalist.

You folks are being conned, and I know it doesn't sit well with you, but all this noise you make about liberty is for naught the moment you allow this fascist to take reigns. He is an authoritarian, and nothing you can say can soften that reality or change it. Everything you feared about the "others" in your keyboard activism is now real...

It is not hyperbole. It is not some prophetic declaration. We are in the beginnings of a real crisis, a authoritarian thread woven in the fabric of the electorate.

The Redhats are marching.

This is what the average Trump supporter would say:

zJn4lA8.jpg
 
You all can keep this up, but clearly your way is not working. It might be time to try something different. Ron's idea to take over from within did not work. Maybe we take over from the outside.

Aren't you the one who supports the party nominee?
 
I've been a Ron Paul Supporter since 2007 and this tastes awesome. Even if this is all talk, it's the right talk. Remember, ideas are more powerful than any army or any government. (I wonder who said that?)
rolleyes.gif


How does this taste?







Or this..

https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkacz...i-was-mistake-but-pushed-for-libya#.benBV2jNo

Donald Trump often rails against U.S. intervention in the Middle East that topples dictators whose exits lead to unstable regional consequences like the rise of ISIS and other terrorist groups. But one intervention he has subsequently come to pan — the 2011 U.S. intervention in Libya, which led to the toppling of longtime leader Muammar al-Qaddafi — Trump once very loudly called for on humanitarian grounds.

...

[Trump in 2011] “I can’t believe what our country is doing,” said Trump on his video blog. “Qaddafi in Libya is killing thousands of people, nobody knows how bad it is, and we’re sitting around we have soldiers all have the Middle East, and we’re not bringing them in to stop this horrible carnage and that’s what it is: It’s a carnage.”

Trump said Libya could end up one of the worst massacres in history, and it would be very easy to topple Qaddafi.

“You talk about things that have happened in history; this could be one of the worst,” he said. “Now we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick. We could do it surgically, stop him from doing it, and save these lives. This is absolutely nuts. We don’t want to get involved and you’re gonna end up with something like you’ve never seen before.”

Trump said the people would take over from Qaddafi eventually and then “they should pay us back” out of appreciation.

“But we have go in to save these lives; these people are being slaughtered like animals,” he said. “It’s horrible what’s going on; it has to be stopped. We should do on a humanitarian basis, immediately go into Libya, knock this guy out very quickly, very surgically, very effectively, and save the lives.”

Let's roll the videotape...



Then there's these, whose flavor you may also want to savor...

In 2002, Donald Trump Said He Supported Invading Iraq

Trump Day After Iraq Invasion: It's "a Tremendous Success"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top