It's TIME FOR RON TO START TAKING ON OBAMA...

wgadget

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
13,946
...just like Romney, who is NOT the nominee, does. In fact, Ron should ignore Romney, just like Romney ignores Ron.

Ron needs to act like THE BOSS re Obama. After all, ONLY RON is gaining steam, the others are fizzling. Let's grab the bull by the horns.

Just my opinion.
 
Romney has to ignore Ron because he knows he has no chance to win if he alienates and/or pisses off Ron's supporters.

But in his speech at the Nevada convention, Paul seemed to be going after Obama more than usual.
 
Just out of curiosity, who is going to televise it if he does? Hm?

Everyone who attends his speaking engagements knows full well that he's the better candidate. What good is it if others aren't hearing it from the corporate (might as well say state run because corporations seem to be people too) media?
 
Last edited:
Romney has to ignore Ron because he knows he has no chance to win if he alienates and/or pisses off Ron's supporters.

But in his speech at the Nevada convention, Paul seemed to be going after Obama more than usual.

Romney loses already lol
 
...just like Romney, who is NOT the nominee, does. In fact, Ron should ignore Romney, just like Romney ignores Ron.

Ron needs to act like THE BOSS re Obama. After all, ONLY RON is gaining steam, the others are fizzling. Let's grab the bull by the horns.

Just my opinion.
President Paul already does.

Perhaps you are refering to this forum? How about this forum is turned into a grassroots ready to take over the presidency?
 
Well, I do agree that he should go after Obamaromney, since they're so much the same.

It makes me sick that the media is calling it a "two-man race" when IT ISN'T. They're directing people's minds off the track. RON IS STILL IN IT. So he should definitely call out BOTH OF THEM.
 
Obama, Romney? What's the difference? He could make the same ads for either one and just change the names, as desired.
 
He should highlight the similarities between Romney and Obama too.

+1 ...and also, when talking about them, just use Obama/Romney when speaking...

**edit**just noticed others basically said the same..
 
Last edited:
Just out of curiosity, who is going to televise it if he does? Hm?

Everyone who attends his speaking engagements knows full well that he's the better candidate. What good is it if others aren't hearing it from the corporate (might as well say state run because corporations seem to be people too) media?

Why don't we televise it? I've been thinking about this for a while and it will probably require a good bit of funding but how about our own TV news network/ channels transmitted through the no longer used UHF radiowaves? How much could this cost? We don't need to run at high def, we could uses old TV station equipment. I'm not sure if everyone knows this but all older tv sets that used an antenna to pick up a few channels no longer operate unless you purchase the new digital converter. But, without the converter shouldn't the frequencies in question still be accessible? Think about all those people who still own old sets and can't afford cable or conversion kits. Also imagine the return of true journalism! Far fetched, probably, but just an idea to get the message out, especially to those of a lower class economic status.
 
Back
Top