It Can't Happen Here!

[jmdrake]

How can you "prove" that someone makes ridiculous claims? That is subjective, it is impossible to prove. But, generally, most people have a similar idea of what constitutes a "ridiculous" claim.

Being so paranoid that you think that every single bad event or every single cough or sneeze you have is the big bad bankers and police officers forcing their own agenda is crazy and ridiculous. Is there corruption? Are their huge schemes used to push agendas? Obviously. But not EVERY SINGLE ATTACK or EVERY SINGLE MAJOR EVENT is a false-flag or some corruption-filled scandal.

He's been right about many of his theories because he has some ridiculous theory on EVERYTHING.

Okay. Please explain why you think talk about Bilderberg and the NWO is "crazy" when...

1) Ron Paul talked about it.

2) Rand Paul talked about it.

3) It's no secret at this point.

4) Even magazines like Rolling Stone are publishing stories about a global banking conspiracy even if they don't give it a specific "name".

You may disagree, but it's crazy at this point to call the theory "crazy". That doesn't mean every single thing is "controlled", but enough is to make the stuff that's not largely irrelevant.

 

[Falcon63]

Okay. Please explain why you think talk about Bilderberg and the NWO is "crazy" when...

1) Ron Paul talked about it.

2) Rand Paul talked about it.

3) It's no secret at this point.

4) Even magazines like Rolling Stone are publishing stories about a global banking conspiracy even if they don't give it a specific "name".

You may disagree, but it's crazy at this point to call the theory "crazy". That doesn't mean every single thing is "controlled", but enough is to make the stuff that's not largely irrelevant.

I never said talk about the Bilderburg Group is crazy, but I think it's crazy to think that they have some secret agenda to control the world and keep the "peasants" down.

It's not so much him mentioning such groups that bothers me, it's his jump to conclusions. Like right after the Boston bombings. Before ANYTHING came out, he claimed it was a false-flag. Could it have been? Yeah, maybe. But he often makes assumptions.

Another example was that video of a bunch of DHS trains with tanks on them (or something along those lines) going through a town. He was quick to claim that the DHS is being trained to fire on American civilians and that they'll soon start killing us all. He's crazy.

 

[John F Kennedy III]

How can you "prove" that someone makes ridiculous claims? That is subjective, it is impossible to prove. But, generally, most people have a similar idea of what constitutes a "ridiculous" claim.

Being so paranoid that you think that every single bad event or every single cough or sneeze you have is the big bad bankers and police officers forcing their own agenda is crazy and ridiculous. Is there corruption? Are their huge schemes used to push agendas? Obviously. But not EVERY SINGLE ATTACK or EVERY SINGLE MAJOR EVENT is a false-flag or some corruption-filled scandal.

He's been right about many of his theories because he has some ridiculous theory on EVERYTHING.

Lol and you're the one that challenged me to test you. You're a troll and you know nothing of the subject of which you speak. Have a nice day.

 

[jmdrake]

I never said talk about the Bilderburg Group is crazy, but I think it's crazy to think that they have some secret agenda to control the world and keep the "peasants" down.

And the Rolling Stone commodity price fixing article means what to you exactly? And the Bill Joy - Wired Magazine article "Why the future doesn't need us?"

It's not so much him mentioning such groups that bothers me, it's his jump to conclusions. Like right after the Boston bombings. Before ANYTHING came out, he claimed it was a false-flag. Could it have been? Yeah, maybe. But he often makes assumptions.

Correction. He speculated that it might be a false flag. He didn't go full bore "false flag" until evidence came out about people being told "This is a drill". And CNN speculated it was a "right wing terrorist". Which is really more "crazy"?

Another example was that video of a bunch of DHS trains with tanks on them (or something along those lines) going through a town. He was quick to claim that the DHS is being trained to fire on American civilians and that they'll soon start killing us all. He's crazy.

It is undeniable that the DHS is buying massive amounts of ammo. It's also undeniable that they were buying "non conventional targets" before someone blew the whistle on that. So you're crazy for calling that "crazy". What do you the the DHS was buying those cardboard cut outs for training?

http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/company-selling-targets-of-kids-got-2-million-from-dhs/

 

[John F Kennedy III]

Looks like Falcon tapped out...

 

[JK/SEA]

still lurking...watch your back...