Israel strikes Iran

The bot wants us talking about comfort women instead of Israel going rogue state.

Good thing we aren't ruled by bots.

Israel isn't a rogue state the USA armed Israel to attack Iran because Iran wouldn't dismantle their nuclear program.

We arent going to wait till Iran has nuclear weapons to act.

They fired over 400 medium range ballistic missiles at Israel and 40 of them hit.

If 40 of them had nuclear warheads that would have been a holocaust.
 
They fired over 400 medium range ballistic missiles at Israel and 40 of them hit.

If 40 of them had nuclear warheads that would have been a holocaust.

Israel fired first. Which makes your attempt to paint Iran as the kind of state that would fire the nukes off first and ask questions later look awfully damned ridiculous. Israel hasn't launched any nukes yet, and they clearly and obviously don't have as much restraint as Iran does.
 
Israel fired first. Which makes your attempt to paint Iran as the kind if state that would fire the nukes off first and ask questions later look awfully damned ridiculous. Israel hasn't launched any nukes yet, and they clearly and obviously don't have as much restraint as Iran does.
Yeah its called preemptive war. You are the one who said offense is the best defense.

You dont wait until you are nuked to attack in preemptive war.
 
The empire of Japan certainly did.

They were considered out of island Japanese.

They spoke Japanese from like 1910 to 1945.

So did Taiwan until we liberated Taiwan and did regime change there.

Um no...
 
You are the one who said offense is the best defense.

Kind of you to try to attribute that to me, but I'm not that old. The statement predates me.

Shut up, stupid bot.

You dont wait until you are nuked to attack in preemptive war.

The only country ever nuked was conducting a preemptive war. They got their asses kicked.

But at least they didn't get their regime changed, so it wasn't totally an unhappy ending.
 
Yeah they did. Imperial Japan did fully incorporate them into Japanese culture and they did complete cultural assimilation and cultural ethnic cleansing.

The people who lived in those regions after the collapse of the Japanese empire had to be reeducated.
 
Yeah its called preemptive war. You are the one who said offense is the best defense.

You dont wait until you are nuked to attack in preemptive war.
Preemptive implies an imminent threat. The IAEA report provided no such evidence.

What Israel/US is involved in is "preventive war", where you attack someone you believe someday might pose an imminent threat.

This is illegal under international law. It's also objectively morally evil.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE: "I need to kill that baby because it might grow up and take revenge or hate me or make me feel icky."
 
Preemptive implies an imminent threat. The IAEA report provided no such evidence.

What Israel/US is involved in is "preventive war", where you attack someone you believe someday might pose an imminent threat.

This is illegal under international law. It's also objectively morally evil.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE: "I need to kill that baby because it might grow up and take revenge or hate me or make me feel icky."

Of course its preemptive war. Preemptive war is a war that preemptively 'breaks the peace' before an impending attack occurs.

We made it clear that the Iranians pursuing a nuclear program would be a declaration of war. Its also defensive to remove it.

The fact is this could have been prevented if the Iranians had either toppled their own government or if their government would have surrendered their nuclear program.

This isn't even a new concept we tried normal relations with Iran but there was always the argument that we should have never allowed the Islamic revolution to happen.

 
International law isn't even a real argument. Something is only illegal if the law is enforced otherwise its defacto legal.

Who is going to enforce International law when Iran goes nuclear and starts nuking us? We are supposed to just wait for it to happen and then call the world police on Iran?
 
President Eisenhower said to always presume your intelligence is wrong and plan your contingency plans around that presumption.

Thats what he learned as a general who was supreme commander of the allied forces that won World War 2.

So your intelligence says that they don't have nuclear weapons what happens if that intelligence is wrong?

Well if that intelligence is wrong we get nuked millions of us will die.

I don't like those odds. Im not willing to make that gamble. That's not an acceptable outcome.
 
The bot's not only inventing fantasy warheads, it's inventing fantasy ICBMs. Well, I guess it's frustrated because it's just a bot and can't masturbate.

israeli-mess-with-wasp-nest-iran-attacks-crying-in-tv-comic.jpg


israel-burning-absolutely-everyone-girl-happy-about-it.jpg
 
The bot's not only inventing fantasy warheads, it's inventing fantasy ICBMs. Well, I guess it's frustrated because it's just a bot and can't masturbate.

israeli-mess-with-wasp-nest-iran-attacks-crying-in-tv-comic.jpg


israel-burning-absolutely-everyone-girl-happy-about-it.jpg


A survey by the American network "Fox News" indicates that about half of the US public supports Israeli strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities as part of Operation "Like a Lion." According to the poll, 49% of respondents support the operation versus 46% who oppose it. The survey also revealed that the support rate among Republican voters stands at 73%, while among Democrats it is 32%. The poll further showed that most of the American public - from both ends of the political spectrum - believes that Iran "poses a real danger" to the United States.

Leaders of Persian Gulf states are interested in the destruction of Iran's nuclear program but prefer this to happen through peaceful means rather than by use of force. This was reported by The New York Times,
 
Back
Top