Isn't it creepy that Fox News and Glenn Beck are stalking this message board?

[mediahasyou]

Hello Glenn Beck.

 

[Josh_LA]

not creepy at all, watch what you say.

 

[Conza88]

Good god some of you people are so full of yourselves.

Tomorrow the sun is coming up because:
God is reading these forums and he is going to steal my idea.
I can predict the future.

There is a big internet outside of this forum, and an even bigger world outside of your basement.

No, see get fcked.

I never said Beck was reading these forums or any bullshit like that.

HENCE: "It's threads like this, that give the real critics a bad name."

Now, you can read my thread I linked too: THAT PREDICTED it all, and was correct... or you can remain in your little boy in the bubble, fearing reality until it's too late.

Yes there is a world out there. And I'm fighting to save it. You're sitting on your ass as far as I can see. Prove me wrong.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Anyone else creeped out by this?? It's like EVERYTHING discussed here is regurgitated by Glenn Beck. I mean, I'm not one that shouts "OMFG PLAGIARISM", but this is without a doubt the most blatant form of it...

FEMA camps, Austrian economics, the Constitution (what news network actually talks about that?? seriously..), the Federal Reserve, Civil Liberties, Socialism, the NWO, they even had Alex Jones on the Freedom Watch show last week.

It's not even enjoyable to watch. I'm starting to get bored by it...at least here we have substantive discussion. On the news, it's apparent Glenn Beck only knows enough to give a two minute monologue on it. Every damn show it's like "THE GOV'T SUCKS, SOCIALISM, AHHHHH!!!"

Anyone else entertained by the fact that Fox News is coming to us for material??

Actually, I think it's FABULOUS.

 

[Zuras]

No, see get fcked.

I never said Beck was reading these forums or any bullshit like that.

HENCE: "It's threads like this, that give the real critics a bad name."
.

Ya, rightist media pundits like Hannity providing covering fire for a republican president while a firing squad for the democrat president, and then vice versa for leftist media pundits like Olberman is really incredible prediction powers you have there.

It's almost as much on a limb as I am predicting the sun will come up tomorrow, almost.

 

[Reason]

It happens when a group of people can no longer be ignored AND ARE RIGHT.

Agreed,

and also all the more reason to establish a higher standard for authenticity and credibility for our boards imo.

 

[akihabro]

We need to make a fake story and get outraged about it. They will surely not do their homework and pick up on it.

 

[Kludge]

We need to make a fake story and get outraged about it. They will surely not do their homework and pick up on it.

 

[socialize_me]

No, see get fcked.

I never said Beck was reading these forums or any bullshit like that.

HENCE: "It's threads like this, that give the real critics a bad name."

Now, you can read my thread I linked too: THAT PREDICTED it all, and was correct... or you can remain in your little boy in the bubble, fearing reality until it's too late.

Yes there is a world out there. And I'm fighting to save it. You're sitting on your ass as far as I can see. Prove me wrong.

Actually Conza's analysis of Fox News is wrong. Fox News isn't a right-wing only station, and they aren't going to start bitching because CNN/MSNBC/etc. are liberal cess pools. For someone who rejects the whole right-left paradigm, your analysis is blanketed with that entire concept.

No, you obviously don't know Rupert Murdoch. Hell, I don't either, but I do listen to those that speak out after knowing him personally, and it's quite obvious now given how Sean Hannity, etc. are all concerned about the Constitution and fiscal discipline. Neither of those are part of Neoconservatism, as Conza thinks the basis of Fox News is. To the contrary, Mr. Murdoch follows the money. Wherever money is to be made, Murdoch will go. Murdoch saw the dedication of Ron Paul supporters during the primaries and how they were attracted to Beck. What happened? He signed Beck to a HUGE $10 million/year deal.

All of a sudden, all of the Fox News cast members are talking about the Constitution and fiscal responsibility. Now I can understand Conza's analysis about how they flip-flopped on fiscal matters, but the Constitution is quite a turn. They're talking about it now BECAUSE it's profitable--not because they're Neocons.

Either way, they are watching this forum--no doubt about it. Why the hell is Beck all over this Missouri blacklist and talking about FEMA camps? Where the HELL else do you hear about that stuff other than here and/or infowars.com?? So they're either reading these forums or visiting Alex Jones...therefore I'm right. Otherwise they wouldn't be covering this stuff, but they are BECAUSE they see we're interested in it. Because we're interested in it here, they play it on there. It's not because they hate CNN, it's because they make money.

Conza's analysis is too much about right-left bickering when all that matters isn't red vs. blue, but rather it's all about the green.

 

[socialize_me]

No, see get fcked.

I never said Beck was reading these forums or any bullshit like that.

HENCE: "It's threads like this, that give the real critics a bad name."

Now, you can read my thread I linked too: THAT PREDICTED it all, and was correct... or you can remain in your little boy in the bubble, fearing reality until it's too late.

Yes there is a world out there. And I'm fighting to save it. You're sitting on your ass as far as I can see. Prove me wrong.

You predicted it??? LOL? Like who the hell couldn't see this coming?

You also posted this on January 27th, 2009. You "predicted" it well after the confetti fell on the Obama love fest. That's like saying I picked oil to go to record levels when it was already at $130/barrel. Now you're appointing yourself as an "expert" because oil went to $147?? Congrats, dude. You are truly amazing.

</sarcasm>

 

[raiha]

it's because Murdoch sees money

Yup!
Are you on a boat Cowlesy?

 

[satchelmcqueen]

ive noticed that they do have to be reading here, which is good IMO. i can only hope they read enough to fully understand what we have been saying for so long.

the only things that get me are when beck slips up and says something that is 180deg of what he was just talking about earlier. today show he did this again by saying that he searched for just 1 republican that will tell it like it is and tell washington how things need to be...or something close to that....then he said he couldnt find even 1. ummm.....how about ron paul?

at least they are reading is my main point. maybe it will convince some of them on his staff or glenn we are the real deal. use the idea that he/staff reads this forum and post things for him to cover. see what happens.

 

[AuH20]

We need to make a fake story and get outraged about it. They will surely not do their homework and pick up on it.

heres a clue. RP fans, associated with the 912 project, are bringing these stories to his attention.

 

[Golding]

Above all else, FOXNews is a business. They are unashamedly biased towards the GOP, because the rest of TV news is unashamedly biased towards the Democrats and Murdoch saw a market that 40%+ would become more comfortable watching. I think Ron Paul's candidacy, and the loud criticism they received for trying to push him off the stage, showed that they have been missing out on a portion of Republicans (libertarian-leaning, paleoconservative, or however they wound up trying to label Ron Paul's supporters).

The reason Beck is all of a sudden trumpeting Ron Paul's message is because it's the role he is assigned to fill. There's good and bad to it. Since he's just playing a role, Beck is inevitably going to be a little bit off-key. But I think there's a lot more good in the fact that the ideals that Ron Paul promoted during his campaign are finally getting regular exposure in the mainstream. I have no problems playing along, because the more success Beck has in voicing the views expressed in this forum, the more the message will permeate along other news shows looking to get the attention of an audience. Until they maybe one day bastardize the message, I think it's worth embracing that someone (even the likes of FOXNews) in the mainstream is promoting these ideas.

 

[FrankRep]

Last Year: Waaah, The mainstream media is ignoring us.


This Year: Waaah, The mainstream media is copying us and using our ideas.

 

[parke]

Becoming mainstream is painful for some people. I use to see it all the time when I was booking underground music acts and then they became mainstream and on the radio and things like that and you get a part of their fans saying how they sold out blah blah blah. But the whole point was to get mainstream and make money.

You see the same thing from Ron Paul supporters they get mad because others are starting to agree with us.

Amen there. I put together shows for years and heard the same complaints. The only thing I worry about is the manipulation of our ideas. Dont think for a moment the MSM will twist it around to say 'We were here first.'

 

[tonesforjonesbones]

Who the hell are you? this is a small forum these days. What makes AN:YONE think that Glenn Beck is taking cues from this forum???? GOOD GRIEF...I'm sure he's sitting around night after night spyin on THIS forum <EYERO:LL> TOnes

 

[specsaregood]

Either way, they are watching this forum--no doubt about it. Why the hell is Beck all over this Missouri blacklist and talking about FEMA camps? Where the HELL else do you hear about that stuff other than here and/or infowars.com?? So they're either reading these forums or visiting Alex Jones...therefore I'm right.

Uhm....
Google Search for "fema camp": about 63,100 .

Google Search for "MIAC Report": about 24,600.

No, couldn't possibly be hearing about that stuff anywhere besides RPF or Infowars.... I heard about the supposed "fema camps" well before ronpaulforums existed.

 

[Conza88]

Ya, rightist media pundits like Hannity providing covering fire for a republican president while a firing squad for the democrat president, and then vice versa for leftist media pundits like Olberman is really incredible prediction powers you have there.

It's almost as much on a limb as I am predicting the sun will come up tomorrow, almost.

Nope, fail.

You're missing the whole point of the thread. God you are thick.

It's not about them attacking Obama, it's about them associating themselves with US, Libertarians, the REAL revolutionaries. Trying to corrupt and blend the differences between Libertarians and Neo-Conservatives...

Was directed at Beck...

Did you think, that Sean Hannity would call himself a Libertarian? And Defend Ron Paul?

Did you think Rush Limbaugh would say, "I love Ron Paul"

Did you think Ann Coulter would vocalize Support for Ron Paul?

I did. It's not amazing if you know the method's and the enemies modus operandi.

Tools like you have no idea what is going on though...

Figures.

 

[Conza88]

Actually Conza's analysis of Fox News is wrong. Fox News isn't a right-wing only station, and they aren't going to start bitching because CNN/MSNBC/etc. are liberal cess pools. For someone who rejects the whole right-left paradigm, your analysis is blanketed with that entire concept.

No, it's describing the concept - you imbecile.

It's describing their methods, of how to keep everyone within the false paradigm.

No, you obviously don't know Rupert Murdoch. Hell, I don't either, but I do listen to those that speak out after knowing him personally, and it's quite obvious now given how Sean Hannity, etc. are all concerned about the Constitution and fiscal discipline. Neither of those are part of Neoconservatism, as Conza thinks the basis of Fox News is. To the contrary, Mr. Murdoch follows the money. Wherever money is to be made, Murdoch will go. Murdoch saw the dedication of Ron Paul supporters during the primaries and how they were attracted to Beck. What happened? He signed Beck to a HUGE $10 million/year deal.

LMFAO. You think that there wasn't money to be made back in the primaries? Are you fcken idiotic? We had 10x times the people on the forums, and everywhere.... we were potentially viral in every regard.

THEY TRIED TO SILENCE US. SHOOT US DOWN. CENSORSHIP. BLACK WALLED US. BLACK OUT. WHO DOES WHEN THEY WANT TO MAKE MONEY? They killed the biggest marketing opportunity to present itself this side of the millennium.

The Ron Paul story is made for a movie. The Honest Politician.

You, are, fcken delusional. WITH A FLICK OF THE SWITCH, with NOTHING changing besides the letter (R) to (D), it was like there was suddenly OMG BAILOUTS have just been happening, forget Bush and all republicans voting for first, OMG NO WAR ON TERROR, CHANGE n stuff... So far from reality.

All of a sudden, all of the Fox News cast members are talking about the Constitution and fiscal responsibility. Now I can understand Conza's analysis about how they flip-flopped on fiscal matters, but the Constitution is quite a turn. They're talking about it now BECAUSE it's profitable--not because they're Neocons.

No. They are the anti-status quo channel now. What happened to the left for the last 8 years is happening to us.

For ALL the SHOUTING from the LEFT, did it change ANYTHING?

Newspapers = profitable? Are you retarded?

Either way, they are watching this forum--no doubt about it. Why the hell is Beck all over this Missouri blacklist and talking about FEMA camps? Where the HELL else do you hear about that stuff other than here and/or infowars.com?? So they're either reading these forums or visiting Alex Jones...therefore I'm right. Otherwise they wouldn't be covering this stuff, but they are BECAUSE they see we're interested in it. Because we're interested in it here, they play it on there. It's not because they hate CNN, it's because they make money.

Because it's being discussed on the interwebs, AJ, here, and most other places... also because they're prepping us?

Money has nothing to do with it. You're a fcken fool.

Conza's analysis is too much about right-left bickering when all that matters isn't red vs. blue, but rather it's all about the green.

Did you even read the entire thread? Of course not. Because you'd see how retarded that statement just was.