Is There Anything to this Barack O-bombshell?

It has been said that schizophrenic people can pass polygraphs but they have to be in one of the other mindsets that believe how the questions is worded.

So if they ask him if he did drugs with Obama and had sex with him and he says yes; and the tester thinks he is being truthful, this is proving that he thinks he did and is in the same mindset as he was in the past.

It does not appear that Larry Sinclair is schizophrenic and he has been on repeated radio and video interviews. Always the same story.

I am sure the tester will test him for mental problems and or shizophrenia.

How to cheat.)

The lie detector only measures heart rate, breathing and blood pressure. If you believe what you say, true or not, these things don't change. This guy could actually believe what he is saying, however without any proof, its irrelevent. Can anyone even put this guy and Obama alone together? Even at the same event/place?
 
I just can't wait for someone to do a hillary one.

Someone with a webcam, do a parody.

Speaking of parodies, anyone else see this

Hilarious...
 
How to cheat.)

The lie detector only measures heart rate, breathing and blood pressure. If you believe what you say, true or not, these things don't change. This guy could actually believe what he is saying, however without any proof, its irrelevent. Can anyone even put this guy and Obama alone together? Even at the same event/place?

I think I good journalist would think that too. Is there proof they were alone? But since Mr. Sinclair was from out of town it sounds like or moved, and did not continue to know the guy that introduced them it is possible this persons name has been forgotten. It is also possible he died, moved away, or wants nothing to do with this case. Totally understandable.

Whitehouse.com or Larry Flint or whoever should be looking into that angle.

And I found this on polygraphs and how they are not foolproof and this site even has a page on this "story".

https://antipolygraph.org/blog/?p=176
 
...even if this is true, who really cares? Only the Christian cultural conservatives would care about the "gay sex" part, and Obama's supporters do not fall into that category. They're young, socially liberal people who have been wooed by his speaking abilities into somehow thinking he represents "change." Spreading this around under our banner would undermine our "big tent" of wide and varied support and give otherwise receptive liberal people an excuse to pigeonhole this campaign and our movement as a whole as "intolerant." Also, considering America has recently elected the same former druggie as President twice in the last 8 years...somehow, I don't think that matters too much, either. ;)

None of Barack's personal past has any bearing on his complete inability to lead this country. He's unable to lead because he can't take a strong patriotic stand on an issue to save his life, he's a big paper tiger of feel-good charisma and media worship, and his advisors, like Zbigniew Brzezinski, are secretly horned demons from the fiery abyss.

I don't care if someone wears rainbow-colored assless chaps and has cracked out gay buttsex every single day on the White House lawn - as long as they take the principled stances that Ron Paul has on the issues, I'll vote for them over anybody else anyday.

(Similarly, Obama's supporters don't care about that either, as long as their candidate is an inspirational speaker :rolleyes:)

I agree, but you're preaching to the choir. I suspect that I'm one of the most unabashed social liberals on these forums. Drugs sex, or anything else people want to do for fun is A-OK with me (barring anything that harms another individual, of course). I only bring it up because the accusations are so shockingly out of character for Barack Obama. Just like when that neolib rag The New Republic tried to paint Ron Paul as a racist, somehow, it just doesn't seem to jibe.
 
Honestly, I completely agree. That doesn't bother me at all, but the crack cocaine charge is a bit of a shock.

I only bring up this story because it's so completely out of left field. I'm not sure whether to believe it or not myself, but it sure casts him in a bad light.

It's just if you watch his mannerisms he doesn't talk or act like he still does hard drugs. You can usually tell there is a switch off with those people. I mean even if there are a lot of disagreements with him on this forum you gotta admit he sounds like he is well educated and speaks very eloquently.

So since I'm for the legalization of ALL drugs I really don't care what he is doing because he is obviously doing something right to have become such an intelligent, well mannered speaker.

It's the same with Huckabee. I disagree with just about everything that comes out of that man's mouth but I gotta admit he's probably the best speaker on either side. If I heard he was doing drugs I wouldn't care that much either because it's not affecting his ability to get his views across.

Bush on the other hand showed a lot of hard times with speaking properly. So when I heard he did crack I felt like that explained everything lol.
 
Back
Top