Is the man behind our fantastic ads's wife really in a Romney-PAC?

chris41336

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
397
I just read in another thread that the man who has helped us to take down Gingrich with that marvelous ad's wife is actually a member of a Romney PAC. While it is possible that these two are individuals who disagree on politics, I don't like how this looks.

Is this true? I'm not promoting any "WE HAVE A MOLE!!!" Conspiracy, I am just honestly curious and am looking for some discussion about it.
 
+rep thread

No "great" ads tearing up Romney though.

We destroy Gingrich and leave Romney unscathed.
 
Last edited:
Yea, I don't care who the creator supports as long as he keeps creating these great ads.

I really hope the Romney gloves come off after Iowa.
 
Well my worry then becomes that this may be why we aren't producing anything against Romney. I don't want deals being discussed between the campaigns yet. It's too soon.
 
the ads are brilliant. i am not paranoid.
mitt romney has not slipped from his
rather solid support. he seldom makes
mistakes. ron paul is not going away.
we have from now until april to get a
meme with legs on mitt. lets be sure
that newt is THE flavor of the week.
 
It's not about political allegiance. It's about doing a job. The 2012 Campaign seems a lot more professional and effective for a reason.
 
It's not about political allegiance. It's about doing a job. The 2012 Campaign seems a lot more professional and effective for a reason.

He's doing a great Job. I am not taking that from him. I just want to know why the campaign isn't doing more against Romney, as we all do, and I saw this connection and it got me wanting to talk to some people who will reassure me that all is well on the western front.
 
The ads are great so incant see any problems.

You missed the point. It would entirely explain why we have gone so soft on Romney and why we weren't airing hard hitting ads in New Hampshire the same way we were hitting Gingrich in Iowa.

I'm not donating anymore until I see a full 30 second video showing Romney flip flops. I'm pissed. This should have been done weeks ago.

Today's new ad is generic and stupid. Yeah show Romney and say flip flopper for half a second. But don't back it up with evidence? Stupid ad.
 
Last edited:
It's a conspiracy, I tellz ya. I heard that the Paul campaign asked this ad guy to make anti-Romney ads, and somehow he was been able to keep producing non-Romney ads. "I thought you said you wanted another anti-Gingrich ad?" was his reply time and time again when asked about that edge anti-Romney ad.

Divide and conquer.

You don't attack the main army until you have squashed the smaller armies nearby. You don't want them attacking you from behind, and you definitely don't want them to merge with the main army.

The goal for the Paul campaign has been to make them the only viable non-Romney choice for GOP voters. I'd say they have been more successful in that endeavor than they could've imagined.
 
Last edited:
You missed the point. It would entirely explain why we have gone so soft on Romney and why we weren't airing hard hitting ads in New Hampshire the same way we were hitting Gingrich in Iowa.

I'm not donating anymore until I see a full 30 second video showing Romney flip flops. I'm pissed. This should have been done weeks ago.

Not donating is not the answer. Donating and ensuring our money is being put to good use is.
 
You missed the point. It would entirely explain why we have gone so soft on Romney and why we weren't airing hard hitting ads in New Hampshire the same way we were hitting Gingrich in Iowa.

I'm not donating anymore until I see a full 30 second video showing Romney flip flops. I'm pissed. This should have been done weeks ago.

Sorry but this is just plain ignorance. He is being guided by the campaign as far as what type of ads to produce. It's not like they have no input and he's controlling the entire media message of the campaign. If the campaign wants a Romney hitpiece ad, they will get one. End of story.
 
Romney has been "attacked" for months and more ads attacking him probably would not change much, I guess thats why the campaign are focusing on Newt and the tactic seems to have worked. I am sure they will make ads "against" Romney later in the stage if its just Paul VS Romney. But right now the money is most likely better spent elsewhere.
 
You missed the point. It would entirely explain why we have gone so soft on Romney and why we weren't airing hard hitting ads in New Hampshire the same way we were hitting Gingrich in Iowa.

I'm not donating anymore until I see a full 30 second video showing Romney flip flops. I'm pissed. This should have been done weeks ago.

Today's new ad is generic and stupid. Yeah show Romney and say flip flopper for half a second. But don't back it up with evidence? Stupid ad.

What's wrong with you? The man does the job he is paid to do. If the campaign asks for a Romney ad, he'll make them a Romney ad.

Relax, friend. :)
 
Romney has been "attacked" for months and more ads attacking him probably would not change much, I guess thats why the campaign are focusing on Newt and the tactic seems to have worked. I am sure they will make ads "against" Romney later in the stage if its just Paul VS Romney. But right now the money is most likely better spent elsewhere.


There is enough material on Romney to knock him favorability down 20 points in NH if they would make it.
 
Back
Top