Is the "Anonymous" threat to Iowa Caucus really from GOP establishment?

[Sematary]

Hacker group "Anonymous" blamed for threatening to hack the results of the Iowa Caucus but is the threat from Anonymous and a thoroughly terrorized GOP Establishment which will stop at nothing to prevent a Ron Paul nomination?

PS - spread this far and wide. We can't allow the oligarchy to decide who our next president is - although it may already be too late, even before it begins.

http://theswash.com/liberty/anonymous-video-calling-for-disruption-of-the-iowa-caucus-vote-is-a-fake

 

[PeacePlan]

Hacker group "Anonymous" blamed for threatening to hack the results of the Iowa Caucus but is the threat from Anonymous and a thoroughly terrorized GOP Establishment which will stop at nothing to prevent a Ron Paul nomination?

PS - spread this far and wide. We can't allow the oligarchy to decide who our next president is - although it may already be too late, even before it begins.

http://theswash.com/liberty/anonymous-video-calling-for-disruption-of-the-iowa-caucus-vote-is-a-fake

They say they are tightening security.. To me that means they are doing something to the computers.. Most likely they are just adjusting them for their candidate.

Paranoid? = Yes

 

[green73]

As Anonymous has endorsed Paul, I assume that either Paul would be safe, or the Establishment is behind this.

 

[eduardo89]

How exactly would they hack the results? Isn't it all done by paper ballot and then the results are counted openly at each precinct? Has the campaign made sure to have one observer at each precinct?

 

[mosquitobite]

As soon as I saw the threat I knew it was really a threat from the establishment.

They've used the whole "Paulbots" spam polls for YEARS now. They don't want people to know we are REAL.

 

[Sematary]

How exactly would they hack the results? Isn't it all done by paper ballot and then the results are counted openly at each precinct? Has the campaign made sure to have one observer at each precinct?

I don't know how they could do it, or if they could do it, but you know if they can, they will.

 

[Sam I am]

"Anonoymous" is anyone who wants to pretend to be "Anonymous". Every time you hear about "Anonymous" odds are you're hearing about a different person / group of people every time.

 

[Jan Eastgate]

These Anonymous people are dangerous! Nothing more that stalkers and hooligans terrorizing anyone for so called "lulz". We've had to deal with them and I can tell you it's not pretty! All they do is spread smears and lies and make childish demands! A few of the videos should give the the idea of the mentality you're up against:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRDBu2tSNsc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65jemsxmKVI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F__W4GDfHT4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk691rHIrkE

There are unfounded smears against great libertarians like Thomas Szasz and Kent Snyder, who was a dear man. Don't let these Anonymous fool you. Nothing is sacred to them. We all thank Dr. Paul for everything he's done to bring back liberty and freedom into out lives.

 

[Jan Eastgate]

As Anonymous has endorsed Paul, I assume that either Paul would be safe, or the Establishment is behind this.

I heard that here http://www.dailypaul.com/178975/anonymous-for-ron-paul but it can't be true. Someone must have been tricked into doing it so the Anonymous could have a reason to attack and mock Dr. Paul and his supporters which is what they do here:
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/thre...senator-rand-paul-supports-scientology.96679/

It is the kind of thing they would do just for fun, or "lulz".