Is Rand Ashamed for Endorsing Romney?

H. E. Panqui

Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2014
Messages
1,125
He ought to be...​

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/44854320/...-care-law-blueprint-federal-law/#.VGst4vnF8mc

"..The role of Gruber could complicate the Romney campaign’s efforts to address the issue. An economist who specializes in health-care issues, he was hired by the Romney’s administration as a consultant and asked to run computer models on the costs of various approaches to extending health-care coverage. He told NBC News he attended one meeting with Romney in which the then governor forcefully insisted on including a controversial provision that some of his political advisers were wary about: the “individual mandate” that would require everybody in the state to purchase health insurance or face a tax penalty.
The same provision has since become the most contentious feature of Obama’s Affordable Care Act.
“This was a big decision to be made and Governor Romney clearly stated that he believed without an individual mandate healthy people could just free ride on the system,” Gruber said of Romney’s decision.
Connection played down
Romney aides have recently tried to suggest that Gruber was not a true adviser to Romney and did not play a big role in shaping the law. But Gruber was personally recognized by Romney for his role when he signed the health-care bill into law and was later appointed by Romney as a board member to the Connector Authority. (He also was given a photograph of the signing ceremony personally signed by Romney that read: “Jonathan, with deep appreciation and congratulations. A Triumph! Mitt Romney.")

Gruber now says he is “proud” of Romney for “sticking up for what he did in Massachusetts” but is “disappointed” about his current efforts to make distinctions between the state law and the Affordable Care Act.
(He also noted that the Massachusetts law didn’t require any increase in taxes only because it received federal health-care funds that defrayed the costs of the new law.)
Romney is “the father of health-care reform,” said Gruber. “I think he is the single person most responsible for health care reform in the United States. … I’m not trying to make a political position or a political statement, I honestly feel that way. If Mitt Romney had not stood up for this reform in Massachusetts … I don’t think it would have happened nationally. So I think he really is the guy with whom it all starts.”
 
Endorsements are about building political capital; not expending it.
 
So, we come here ostensibly to laugh at the people still caught up in the false left/right paradigm and still concerned over the silliness and the divisiveness of party politics, demonstrate that the thing we know best about economics is how to ridicule people for knowing less than us whether they do or not, and now we're posting articles designed and built to touch on the last shred of divided conqueredness in Recovering Democrats and scare them away from the joys of Blue Republicanism.

Yet we aren't engaging in trollish behavior. Even though this is the first time we've been polite since we got here.

Alllllllrightie then.
 
This is why i thought that HillarysLosers campaign was so childish. Rand has endorsed some VERY BIG losers.
 
As horrible as a candidate Romney was, endorsing him was a great move. This will still help Rand in the 2016 primaries as republicans (unlike libertarians) care about this whole "team player" thing :)
 
I don't "like" the Romney endorsement, but I certainly get how it makes sense politically. I have a problem with anyone voting for or supporting a warmonger for any political office from a Christian moral perspective, but I can understand why politicians will do what they need to do on some of these issues in order to win. This is part of why I have no interest in being a politician. I couldn't handle the moral compromise required, even if I were to run as a minarchist.
 
This again? People are going to whine and argue all the way through 2016, and then turn around and wonder where all the time went to.
 
You know, I almost didn't click on this because of the silly title. Rand didn't make the Romney endorsement out of anything but political expediency. That said the OP information is good stuff. Romney might try to run again in 2016 and we need to shut him down. Hard.
 
No because he wouldn't be senator if he hadn't promised to do so, and he wouldn't be in the best position right now to actually change things. When is this gonna stop? Will you guys ever get it? You can stand in the corner holding signs, feeling good about yourselves for being smarter than most of the population or you can actually work on making liberty mainstream.
 
Last edited:
Honestly.

Why is this so difficult?

I still have a hard time swallowing the fact that he didn't just say:

"I endorse my father for president, period."

Never would have to bother about Gruber-Gate.

If he had done that then he could just forget about ever running for President as a Republican.
 
Back
Top