Is North Dakota missing 3000+ votes?

[PaulSoHard]

http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/state/nd

CNN is reporting a Rick Santorum victory with 76% of the votes or precincts counted.

Now unless that's 76% of the precincts counted, with 100% of the vote in it will come out to be around 14,933 votes.

The vote total right now is 11,349.

This comes out to be 14,933 - 11,349 = 3584 votes missing. I don't know if CNN reports their percentages based on votes in or precincts in. Google elections calls that ND caucus with 100% of the districts reporting.

It's questionable whether they're reporting by precinct or votes because for the Arizona primary, CNN has 82% in but when you look at the results by county, all counties are reported as 100%, which leads me to believe that they're reporting by the vote totals

Whatever the case was, I just wanted to point out that this could have made a huge difference seeing that the deficit between 1st and 2nd was 1,324 votes.

If not then you can completely ignore this thread.

 

[Xenliad]

I've been asking this on here for while but have gotten no answer.

 

[ichirix]

It's final (according to the ND GOP)

http://www.northdakotagop.org/caucus/

 

[goldpants]

They finally feel confident in no one bothering them about destroying or altering the final few thousand votes.

 

[SaulPaulinsky]

I know at least 4 districts that are right.

 

[VinnyG]

You can't go by what the websites say with percent reporting. Especially once a state is called, and especially on Super Tuesday when they are trying to update so much at once.

 

[libertythor]

Good point. Also, not every precinct is the same size.

You can't go by what the websites say with percent reporting. Especially once a state is called, and especially on Super Tuesday when they are trying to update so much at once.

 

[Keith and stuff]

Everything is fine according to Google.
http://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/results/2012/gop-primary/nd