Is It Time For Civil Disobedience?

It has been time. No one wants to be the first one (INCLUDING Mike Church), that is the problem. If he is serious lead by example.
 
I Disobey every day.

Whether or not my behavior is considered illegal, unlawful, immoral, or violates any city or county ordinances, or contractual obligations to my employer will always be a subjective declaration, and not an objective one. As far as I am concerned, I dont do anything wrong. Give it 10 years and my daily activities will be completely against the law.
 
I think that civil disobedience would only make "them" increase their levels of violence. On the other hand, it is always time for disobedience, but I wonder if it's a time for civility as well.
 
The time for civil disobedience has long past.

There are very many examples of when we should have done it.

Now it is too late, the people can't overcome the government anymore.

If a time comes when and election has been postponed or nullified
for some reason, that is the time for revolution.

As it stands now the government has all the keys to power and the people just
have words.

Can we overcome the riot police with rocks?

Can we shoot down drones with slingshots?

When we have this "civil disobedience" moment it will be a cause for
laughter in the halls of power.

Because it is too late.

But there is Good News.
 
The time for civil disobedience has long past.

There are very many examples of when we should have done it.

Now it is too late, the people can't overcome the government anymore.

If a time comes when and election has been postponed or nullified
for some reason, that is the time for revolution.

As it stands now the government has all the keys to power and the people just
have words.

Can we overcome the riot police with rocks?

Can we shoot down drones with slingshots?

When we have this "civil disobedience" moment it will be a cause for
laughter in the halls of power.

Because it is too late.

But there is Good News.

I agree completely. At this particular point in time, acts of civil disobedience would, quite literally, be laughed at. Then they would employ violence toward those mundanes who dared disobey their masters' orders.

I strongly believe that most people who become our "representatives" are megalomaniacs, if not outright sociopaths. The same applies to law enforcement personnel (even moreso, perhaps). There's a certain personality type that gravitates toward certain professions, after all.

The bottom line is they simply will not stop, as their thirst for power is as unquenchable as my thirst for liberty.
 
No, definitely not, we've got too much potential in electing all these great liberty candidates. We're growing and flourishing on the internet, and over the next couple of years, we'll only get more mainstream. No peaceful change is going to happen over night, but if we continue what we're doing, I think we will eventually get there. The internet is playing a huge part in this and as long as we have it the way it is, I only see more positive change coming in the future.
 
The biblethumpers have been practicing it for years outside abortion clinics, that's why abortions never happen anymore.
 
No, definitely not, we've got too much potential in electing all these great liberty candidates. We're growing and flourishing on the internet, and over the next couple of years, we'll only get more mainstream. No peaceful change is going to happen over night, but if we continue what we're doing, I think we will eventually get there. The internet is playing a huge part in this and as long as we have it the way it is, I only see more positive change coming in the future.

At least from what I've seen, the internet seems to be a really poor indicator of reality. In the internet world, everyone loves Ron Paul and hates our tyrannical government. In the real world, most people haven't even heard of Ron Paul, nor do they even understand or care about the nature of our government.
 
At least from what I've seen, the internet seems to be a really poor indicator of reality. In the internet world, everyone loves Ron Paul and hates our tyrannical government. In the real world, most people haven't even heard of Ron Paul, nor do they even understand or care about the nature of our government.

I'd have to disagree. I think we're on the forefront of what the general public desires. As an example, the Ron Paul movement that led to the tea party that became a national phenomenon could be seen as a microcosm of this.
 
No


Once a necessary legal measure like "civil disobedience" has been implemented in order to bring the American people back to revere our blessed nation, our Founding Fathers and the natural law they declared in The Declaration of Independence, as well as the "more perfect union" they established for us in the U.S. Constitution, with all this together being considered an American Movement, then after such has been utilized, that measure from then on becomes a legal precedent.
Simply put, legal precedents are the equivalent of a "can of worms." As our Founding Fathers utilized legal measures to increase the people's Civil Purpose, lawyers today utilize legal precedents to scatter the truths and the opinions of the people for their own material gain.
 
Back
Top