Is Fox News Ignoring Rand Paul? Help Change It!

lol, all this will do is tell Roger Ailes that the libertarians are gaining on him and to put the clamp down even harder. You think he cares about being fair? What business do you think he's in? Not propaganda?
 
Wow! Thanks Keith! I need to let Wayne know!

11329993_973527349325275_1008168880417839823_n.jpg
 
I happened to be flipping through the channels this morning and I stopped on fox news when I noticed they were talking presidential politics. They did throw up their poll on the screen and actually included Rand to my surprise. They had him in forth behind Carson. I was just pleased to see they actually included him.

As for Mr. Carson, do you guys/gals actually hear that much support for him where yall live? The reason I ask is I'm simply having a hard time believing that he is anywhere near Rand or any of the other front runners because everyone I've talked to have never heard of him. It's almost as if he's (along with Cruz) been put there simply to try and dilute the "outsider" vote away from Rand. I just don't understand how in a national poll he can be polling so high when at least in my experience no one has even heard of the guy.
 

Wow that's good to see, but it's obvious fox news lacks consistency and cherry picks the polls they decide to show. They showed there own this morning which had Rand in 4th place behind, Bush, Rubio, and Carson to my surprise. I'm pretty sure it was Rubio in second, and not Walker, but Bush 1st, Carson 3rd, and Paul 4th are in the correct order. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is Fox News the only polling data that consistently shows Ben Carson in the top tier? I can possibly see him polling high in single states like Iowa and New Hampshire, but a national poll? I just asked that in my previous post, but I'm curious if you folks are hearing that kind of support at the national level where you live? I think it's obvious he's been put there to try and siphon votes away from Rand and it's also obvious Fox News is attempting to do what Cnn did with Santorum. I think it's sad on both ends that an artificial poll can so easily sway public opinion for or even against a candidate.
 
Wow that's good to see, but it's obvious fox news lacks consistency and cherry picks the polls they decide to show. They showed there own this morning which had Rand in 4th place behind, Bush, Rubio, and Carson to my surprise. I'm pretty sure it was Rubio in second, and not Walker, but Bush 1st, Carson 3rd, and Paul 4th are in the correct order. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is Fox News the only polling data that consistently shows Ben Carson in the top tier? I can possibly see him polling high in single states like Iowa and New Hampshire, but a national poll? I just asked that in my previous post, but I'm curious if you folks are hearing that kind of support at the national level where you live? I think it's obvious he's been put there to try and siphon votes away from Rand and it's also obvious Fox News is attempting to do what Cnn did with Santorum. I think it's sad on both ends that an artificial poll can so easily sway public opinion for or even against a candidate.

If anyone is overperforming in the Fox polls, it's Jeb Bush. Some of the variations between different polls can be attributed to different ratios of republicans and republican-leaning-independents. Wording of the questions are different from poll to poll, the easiest way to see this variation is the number of people who are undecided. Most is due to margin of error. For most of these polls the margin is about 5%. So if you're down for instance 3% in the poll you are statistically tied for the lead.

The trend though is that Walker is down in the polls, Rand Paul is up a couple of points, Huckabee has a small announcement bump, Carson is doing well, while Bush and Rubio are holding on after previously sinking in the polls. Cruz is fading a bit, but not much.

The most usual polls at this time shows Paul, Bush, Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Huckabee and Walker with 65-70% almost equally divided between them. Then about 15% undecided, and the remaining 15-20% divided among the "Clowns and unknowns"-caucus. (Perry, Christie, Santorum, Trump, Fiorina, Graham, Kasich, Jindal, Pataki) At this point, considering the strong frontrunners, the rise of these remaining candidates will depend on the major candidates stumbling. If Bush is fading, then Christie or Kasich can take his place, if Huckabee or Carson gives up, it will give room to Santorum etc.
 
If anyone is overperforming in the Fox polls, it's Jeb Bush. Some of the variations between different polls can be attributed to different ratios of republicans and republican-leaning-independents. Wording of the questions are different from poll to poll, the easiest way to see this variation is the number of people who are undecided. Most is due to margin of error. For most of these polls the margin is about 5%. So if you're down for instance 3% in the poll you are statistically tied for the lead.

The trend though is that Walker is down in the polls, Rand Paul is up a couple of points, Huckabee has a small announcement bump, Carson is doing well, while Bush and Rubio are holding on after previously sinking in the polls. Cruz is fading a bit, but not much.

The most usual polls at this time shows Paul, Bush, Rubio, Cruz, Carson, Huckabee and Walker with 65-70% almost equally divided between them. Then about 15% undecided, and the remaining 15-20% divided among the "Clowns and unknowns"-caucus. (Perry, Christie, Santorum, Trump, Fiorina, Graham, Kasich, Jindal, Pataki) At this point, considering the strong frontrunners, the rise of these remaining candidates will depend on the major candidates stumbling. If Bush is fading, then Christie or Kasich can take his place, if Huckabee or Carson gives up, it will give room to Santorum etc.

So would you say that Carson is pulling most of his support from social conservatives? I'm just having a hard time believing that he's polling that strongly at the "national level." I could somewhat believe that kind of support in Iowa, but not nationally. Everyone I've talked to has never heard of him which is why I ask.
 
So would you say that Carson is pulling most of his support from social conservatives? I'm just having a hard time believing that he's polling that strongly at the "national level." I could somewhat believe that kind of support in Iowa, but not nationally. Everyone I've talked to has never heard of him which is why I ask.

Yes, he's mostly drawing evangelicals. Especially the young evangelicals, and he's more popular among female voters.
 
Back
Top