Is Christie out? If so, who is the new 2016 GOP Presidential Hopeful?

Am I the only one who actually kind of likes Scott Walker? I'd definitely support him in 2016 if Rand didn't win the nomination.
 
It has and always will be JEB, with Rubio as his VP

Exactly. It is like watching a movie where the plot is so predictable. Of course they will try to give the illusion of a race and claim that Rubio or Ryan can actually win the nomination. They may even try to bring back Romney. They do this also to dilute the field to ensure every 4 years a real Conservative does not get the nomination while ensuring their anointed RINO wins.
 
Last edited:
Ha ha!

I was going to ask why would Christie be out if Benghazi Hillary's still in, but this trumps that (or is it "that trumps this"?).

(Dramatic movie theater voiceover)

INTRODUCING the Main Stream Media! Where Republican Scandals are THE END OF THE WORLD and Democrat scandals are just something to chuckle at on the way to office. A heart-warming tale of romance and intrigue, watch all the rational liberals destroy the neo-confederates and the misogynists on the way to making our planet a better place! Watch this movie now! It's for the children, after all.
 
Hillary Clinton will probably be who the GOP sends to the White House.

Agree with ya ... If it becomes a choice between Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush, or Chris Christie; I'm moving to Ecuador.
 
Agree with ya ... If it becomes a choice between Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush, or Chris Christie; I'm moving to Ecuador.
Well, after watching them send Obama back to the White House, I just figured as usual, they would repeat what they did last time. Seems they either like having Democrats in the White House, or they are too stupid to run somebody against them, people would actually vote for.
 
Well, after watching them send Obama back to the White House, I just figured as usual, they would repeat what they did last time. Seems they either like having Democrats in the White House, or they are too stupid to run somebody against them, people would actually vote for.

Honestly I think it's an intentional effort to see who the most monstrous person they can get elected is. Like a big joke on us. "Hey, look, Obama is the incumbent, who do we think is just awful but may be able to barely squeak past this guy?" It's like they are trying to push the tyranny just as quickly as they can. I don't think they are really trying to lose as much as when they see the Dems put up a "3" they will intentionally put up what they think is a "3.5" rather than say a 6, because the 3.5 will get them the tyranny they want more quickly, and if their guy loses they don't really case because the Dem will advance tyranny too, and they figure eventually a Rep will land in office by accident if nothing else.
 
Honestly I think it's an intentional effort to see who the most monstrous person they can get elected is. Like a big joke on us. "Hey, look, Obama is the incumbent, who do we think is just awful but may be able to barely squeak past this guy?" It's like they are trying to push the tyranny just as quickly as they can. I don't think they are really trying to lose as much as when they see the Dems put up a "3" they will intentionally put up what they think is a "3.5" rather than say a 6, because the 3.5 will get them the tyranny they want more quickly, and if their guy loses they don't really case because the Dem will advance tyranny too, and they figure eventually a Rep will land in office by accident if nothing else.
That very well may be the case.
 
He was never in for me and is even more out with me now than ever...

then this sort of thing seems just the sort of thing those that pick whom we are allowed to vote for seem to bank on.

So who knows.

Maybe the days of casting your vote at a ballot box are over.
 
Back
Top