I ate dinner with the in-laws last night, both Fox News regurgitaters. I avoided the topic of politics for most of the meal, but, toward the end, my wife just couldn't help herself. She brought up Ron Paul, which triggered a stream of Fox News talking points from my father-in-law. First the newsletters, then "I like a lot of what he says, but shutting down all of our military bases and being an isolationist is just crazy", followed by, and this one was new to me, "he also has an enormous ego".
We were eating with them in order to reveal the name of our first child, so I didn't want to ruin the evening by schooling my father-in-law. However, I couldn't let the isolationist thing go. I said, "Based on Fox News' definition of isolationist, anyone who isn't bombing other countries and setting up military bases around the world is an isolationist nation. Ron Paul's policy is one of nonintervention.(you guys know the rest of that point...) Once I was finished, crickets... I followed up with, "Would you consider Canada to be isolationist? Switzerland?" There was a long pause and then, "Well, those newsletters really raise some questions." I set him straight on that as well. The "having a huge ego" line wasn't worth my time. If someone is so ill-informed that they think Ron Paul has a huge ego, then I've got better things to do.
The good news is that, as devoted as they are to their Fox News masters, both of my in-laws said that they would vote for Ron Paul if he won the Republican nomination. It bothers me though that the Fox News disciples seem more interested in being viewed as part of the "in crowd" than being informed. I thought that ended in high school, but my in-laws are 50+ years old. Now that they are supporting their 4th candidate in about as many months, you would think that they would start to question Fox News a little bit, but, sadly, they are as devoted as ever. Ron Paul definitely has more patience for people like this than I do.