Intersting Polling Data: Pat Buchanan 1996

[Nash]

This poll was a week before he won New Hampshire:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/polls/cnn.time/011796.shtml

This poll was after he won New Hampshire:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/polls/cnn.time/022396.shtml

Note the 15% jump nationally once he became "credible".

Of course he didn't win and I hope the Paul campaign learns from that. However it gives me hope that someone polling so low nationally 1 week before NH can win the state. I believe that Paul can do the same.

 

[Noodles]

I think you are right on target, Nash. It really feels like the fuse is lit, and we're squinching our eyes shut and holding our ears shut.

 

[guntherg16]

This poll was a week before he won New Hampshire:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/polls/cnn.time/011796.shtml

This poll was after he won New Hampshire:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/polls/cnn.time/022396.shtml

Note the 15% jump nationally once he became "credible".

Of course he didn't win and I hope the Paul campaign learns from that. However it gives me hope that someone polling so low nationally 1 week before NH can win the state. I believe that Paul can do the same.

Buchanan was hit with a massive smear campaign right after he won New Hampshire.

For more information on that: http://www.jbs.org/node/1188

This time around we've got the internet working in our favor.

 

[Bradley in DC]

Excellent job, Nash. We are the 2008 version of the "peasants with pitchforks"!

 

[specsaregood]

Buchanan was hit with a massive smear campaign right after he won New Hampshire.

For more information on that: http://www.jbs.org/node/1188

This time around we've got the internet working in our favor.

What a great article. Ron Paul is going to get slaughtered by the media; with lies and blatant mischaracterization. Obviously, he must know this and is preparing for it.

 

[CJLauderdale4]

This is the optimistic outlook we should be praying for!!