International War on Trees

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1693442106797310320

https://twitter.com/Inversionism/status/1693418574721753531

Believe them when they tell told you:

The scare-mongers even want you to voluntarily pay them for the privilege of being propagandized by them:

(Look at the cover picture and guess what the video depicts. It won't be hard at all ...)

https://twitter.com/TIME/status/1382956128229847041

 

[Occam's Banana]

The overweening vileness of these vandalous bastards beggars all description.

"I love it when people say that Ayn Rand's villains were too over-the-top and unrealistic." -- Michael Malice
​

https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1694821398118572293

 

[acptulsa]

The overweening vileness of these vandalous bastards beggars all description.

"I love it when people say that Ayn Rand's villains were too over-the-top and unrealistic." -- Michael Malice
​

https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1694821398118572293

Destroy the planet's number two converter of carbon dioxide to oxygen for the purpose of... What, again?

The Science™ is alive and well. And you are the carbon it wants to reduce.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

https://twitter.com/joekent16jan19/status/1691495182296920089

 

[acptulsa]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1698412001205067894

 

[acptulsa]

 

[acptulsa]

 

[Occam's Banana]

They were never your friends, and you never really cared about them at all.

It served your political purposes to pretend you cared.

Now it doesn't.

That's all this is.

 

[acptulsa]

 

[acptulsa]

Plants simply have to go.

https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1725717547192889625

 

[Occam's Banana]

Plants simply have to go.

https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1725717547192889625

↑↑↑​

If "climate change" alarmists had a model that produced consistently correct predictions, they wouldn't need to go on about "consensus" or "meta-analysis" [...]. They could just point to their consistently correct predictive model and say, "Deny this, bitchez!" But they can't [do that] because they don't have [any such model] - all they [can] do is concoct excuses for why their models have [repeatedly failed to make] correct predictions while demanding that everyone consider the matter to be "settled" because they have a "consensus" (and the dodgy "meta-analyses" to "prove" it).

 

[Occam's Banana]

Plants simply have to go.

https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1725717547192889625

"Plants simply have to go."

Well, now, I guess that all depends on what kind of "plant" you're talking about ...

https://www.freethink.com/energy/direct-air-capture-stratos

 

[acptulsa]

Well, now, I guess that all depends on what kind of "plant" you're talking about ...

How much you want to bet it gets hooked up to a coal-fired portion of the grid?

Trees, on the other hand, really are solar powered.

 

[mtr1979]

There are more trees today in the US than there were 100 years ago.
https://www.upworthy.com/america-has-more-trees-now-than-its-had-in-100-years-but-were-not-out-of-the-woods-yet

Most people have no idea about the natural environment. It is a battle every single year to prevent trees from taking over pastures. Unless you burn or mow the pasture a least once a year trees take over. Eastern Red Cedars will take over pastures quickly.

To see native prairie grasses a person has to go to state or federally protected lands. It would be nice for people that have no connection with the land and who have never worked land a day in their life to keep their mouths shut and stay in their lane.

 

[acptulsa]

It would be nice for people that have no connection with the land and who have never worked land a day in their life to keep their mouths shut and stay in their lane.

You talking about the government, me or both?

 

[mtr1979]

You talking about the government, me or both?

I may have come off a bit harsh. I forget not everyone grew up in the country. People don't know what they don't know. I mostly blame the media because they are telling people who have an empty slate what to believe. I'm expecting too much from people to know anything about prairie ecosystems even though it is basic junior high science.

 

[acptulsa]

I may have come off a bit harsh. I forget not everyone grew up in the country. People don't know what they don't know. I mostly blame the media because they are telling people who have an empty slate what to believe. I'm expecting too much from people to know anything about prairie ecosystems even though it is basic junior high science.

And what do you think of people killing plants and proclaiming that this will help reduce the very gaseous chemical that plants consume for their carbon atoms? You know. What do you actually think of the subject of this thread?

 

[mtr1979]

And what do you think of people killing plants and proclaiming that this will help reduce the very gaseous chemical that plants consume for their carbon atoms? You know. What do you actually think of the subject of this thread?

I see the hypocrisy, but expect nothing less from those people. These are the same individuals who go whichever way the wind blows.

As far as planting more more trees it is something people can do to make themselves feel good. Sure I'm against deforestation, but I'm also against people planting trees where they don't belong.

 

[acptulsa]

 

[Pauls' Revere]

Nothing but nothing absorbs more CO2 from the atmosphere than trees. Nothing releases more O2 oxygen for us to breathe than trees. Nothing keeps an area cooler than trees, intercepting the sunlight before it warms the ground and absorbing some of the energy for photosynthesis.

So why is it that, from declaring wood a "carbon-neutral fuel" and switching from burning coal to burning trees, to this crap, so-called environmental concern seems to invariably lead to what was the greatest bane of the environmentalist: Clear cutting?

Once again liberals are being asked to prove their hypocrisy and their ability to switch from one virtue signal to its exact opposite without ever asking why.

https://twitter.com/BernieSpofforth/status/1681734824610897922

"In order to battle the buildup of greenhouse gases" they're doing the one and only thing they can do which could upset the balance of nature enough to cause a buildup of CO2.

Teh Science™ is alive and well.

Link is dead.