Intellectual Property rights

CaptainAmerica said:
Seriously, telling me to "adapt or die" is not friendly. You tell me to swallow pride when it is actually a perspective in debate. You tell me how to run my own "business model" to insure my own "survival" .........................................................
Click to expand...


You take things WAY too seriously. I can't really "tell" you much of anything. This is just a message board. I have no power whatever to compell your compliance in any way.

What I CAN do is make suggestions. And I respectfully suggest that you adapt NOW, or face the VERY REAL probability of losing BIG in the REAL WORLD market.

You are, of course, perfectly free to just ignore everything I say. Your choice.

But don't expect any tears from me if you do. You've been warned.
 
Revolution9 said:
You can build your house with a copy of the patented system. The moment you copy the patented system and try to sell it is the moment you crossed the legalistic line.

You can build your toaster and sell it. Everybody knows how toasters work. You cannot put Braun or KitchenMaid for example on the toasters you made to sell unless you licensed those marks from them. You can however put KRS Toasters or whatever trips your fancy and that is fine.
Click to expand...

In year from then, I'm not allowed to sell my house?

By your logic if everyone knows how a specific OS works, then they have right to recreate it and sell it. Great. We finally agree on something.
 
CCTelander said:
You take things WAY too seriously. I can't really "tell" you much of anything. This is just a message board. I have no power whatever to compell your compliance in any way.

What I CAN do is make suggestions. And I respectfully suggest that you adapt NOW, or face the VERY REAL probability of losing BIG in the REAL WORLD market.

You are, of course, perfectly free to just ignore everything I say. Your choice.

But don't expect any tears from me if you do. You've been warned.
Click to expand...

I don't know about you, but I'll be laughing my ass off.
 
CaptainAmerica said:
ridiculous.
preview_large.jpg
unimpressed with your anti-intellectual property arguments
Click to expand...

hahahahhahahahah that was actually pretty fitting.
 
how about getting a population of humans to agree upon imaginary constructs is not a foundation that can be possibly agreed upon let alone objectively verified as truth, most things aren't, which is why there are endless battles on teh internets about such things. so now I say, whatever you can get another human to agree upon so that he may pay you or respect a line drawn in the sand, have at it! good day sirs




and don't forget to have fun playing The Game!
 
Last edited:
noneedtoaggress said:
It's fitting because that character was equally as obtuse as you've been acting throughout this thread.
Click to expand...
You have an obsession with obtuse angles... just saying . LOL and stop attacking me on a personal level if you have nothing to say intelligently with it in regards to fraud,and property and how they correlate.
 
CaptainAmerica said:
it is fitting and if the property owner asks me to take it down I would ;)
Click to expand...


Wait a minute here. You mean I only have to respect someone else's property rights (allowing the term simply for the sake of argument. IP is NOT property.) if they specifically request or demand that I do?

Does that mean I can bring my dog along to crap in your yard until you ask or demand that I don't?

Just curious.
 
CCTelander said:
Wait a minute here. You mean I only have to respect someone else's property rights (allowing the term simply for the sake of argument. IP is NOT property.) if they specifically request or demand that I do?

Does that mean I can bring my dog along to crap in your yard until you ask or demand that I don't?

Just curious.
Click to expand...
different kind of property. I am not crapping on someones yard, but if the property owner of the picture doesn't like me using it then I will take it down.
 
CaptainAmerica said:
You have an obsession with obtuse angles... just saying . LOL and stop attacking me on a personal level if you have nothing to say intelligently with it in regards to fraud,and property and how they correlate.
Click to expand...


This from the guy who spent the first half of the thread calling everyone who disagreed with him a Marxist? Seems just a tad hypocritical.

But I DO appreciate that you haven't been doing that more recently. Thanks for that, at least.
 
CaptainAmerica said:
You have an obsession with obtuse angles... just saying . LOL and stop attacking me on a personal level if you have nothing to say intelligently with it in regards to fraud,and property and how they correlate.
Click to expand...

I said you've been acting obtuse.

If you want me not to say that then stop ignoring arguments you don't want to confront and repeating the same tired mess over and over.

There's already been pages upon pages of me and many others attempting to have reasonable discourse with you. Obviously that's not going to be possible until you stop acting in the manner you have.
 
CCTelander said:
This from the guy who spent the first half of the thread calling everyone who disagreed with him a Marxist? Seems just a tad hypocritical.

But I DO appreciate that you haven't been doing that more recently. Thanks for that, at least.
Click to expand...
there is nothing hypocritical about it. I am not claiming to be the creator of that art or to resell it
 
noneedtoaggress said:
I said you've been acting obtuse.

If you want me not to say that then stop ignoring arguments you don't want to confront and repeating the same tired mess over and over.

There's already been pages upon pages of me and many others attempting to have reasonable discourse with you. Obviously that's not going to be possible until you stop acting in the manner you have.
Click to expand...


Hubris will have that effect on people.
 
well ,it surely has been fun debating you guys...obviously the debate has degraded. Maybe when you are ready to answer me about fraud and its correlation to property we can continue the debate.
 
CaptainAmerica said:
well ,it surely has been fun debating you guys...obviously the debate has degraded. Maybe when you are ready to answer me about fraud and its correlation to property we can continue the debate.
Click to expand...


Wow. Obtuse certainly is the right word.

That "issue" has only been dealt with maybe, what, a dozen times in this thread already? You're just butthurt because you didn't like the answer.

Get over it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Swordsmyth
Why Property Tax Is Illegal
Replies
12
Views
5K
Snowball
Snowball
PAF
Making Palestine Go Away
2
Replies
32
Views
334
Snowball
Snowball
Swordsmyth
Trump, His New MAGA Critics, and the “Art of the Possible”
Replies
0
Views
64
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
susano
An account of comedy writer who got cancelled for being "gender critical"
Replies
0
Views
305
susano
susano
PAF
Refugee. Dissident. Enemy of the State. Would ICE Have Crucified Jesus?
Replies
6
Views
59
familydog
F
Back
Top