Inside the mind of a "law and order" Republican

Could you just name something specific? Post office? Design the flag?

How 'bout sticking to the topic of this thread?

Law-n-Order..... I do not want to subject other communities/counties or states to the Law-n-Order of my community, nor do I want their Law-n-Order imposed on my community....



I feel very strongly that the biggest problem in almost all democracies/republics is allowing parasites to vote. Only people that pay more in taxes than they get in benefits should be allowed to vote.

I could agree with this IF government 'employees' contractors and pensioners would be barred from voting too...

Existing off government largess is all the same to me.....A federal judge or a welfare crack-whore are both suckin' up tax dollars.
 
I'm amazed that [MENTION=27917]NorthCarolinaLiberty[/MENTION] isn't calling out [MENTION=65299]Swordsmyth[/MENTION] out for a troll at his point!

This forum is entertaining.
 
You say there is nothing government should do, therefore you are an Anarchist, if you believe you are right then you should be proud, instead you take insult when I call you what you are and try to weasel out of admitting what you believe.

Mirror?

Stop with the names and insults- only shows that you have no argument.
 
Nothing in life has ever been done perfectly, ALL systems succumb to corruption, civilization does better with government than without.

Then why on earth would you think it was good idea to put phalanxes of heavily armed enforcers of same in every town, boro and neighborhood across the country?

And I was just looking for one, just one, example.

This is the last I will say about this because you can't debate Anarchists, they are to committed to their fantasy that they can solve all problems by converting everyone to their philosophical religion.

My position is quite clear and consistent for over ten years now.

You can look to my voluminous past posting history to see where I stand on this.

If that makes me an anarchist, so be it...but there's no reason to leave, I'm just asking questions.

Here's another: Is the United States, in 2017, a police state?
 
I feel very strongly that the biggest problem in almost all democracies/republics is allowing parasites to vote. Only people that pay more in taxes than they get in benefits should be allowed to vote.

And yet there is a campaign to red bar Zippy. LMAO.
 
Words have meaning, someone who believes government should not do anything is an Anarchist look it up.

I know exactly what an anarchist is.

Someone who thinks gov should take care of government created problems while acting like it's not a government problem, is a neocon- look it up.
 
Then why on earth would you think it was good idea to put phalanxes of heavily armed enforcers of same in every town, boro and neighborhood across the country?

And I was just looking for one, just one, example.



My position is quite clear and consistent for over ten years now.

You can look to my voluminous past posting history to see where I stand on this.

If that makes me an anarchist, so be it...but there's no reason to leave, I'm just asking questions.

Here's another: Is the United States, in 2017, a police state?

If you read the rest of this thread you will see that I want less police and less laws, but some people run around demanding that we should have none.

The answer to your question depends on your exact location in this continent wide nation, some places are others are not.
 
I know exactly what an anarchist is.

Someone who thinks gov should take care of government created problems while acting like it's not a government problem, is a neocon- look it up.
Not when the problem was that government failed to do something it should.
 
Words have meaning, someone who believes government should not do anything is an Anarchist look it up.

I have.

Many times.

Anarchy, in its most strict sense, is a state of existence in which there are no rulers.

Origin and Etymology of anarchy:

Medieval Latin anarchia, from Greek, from anarchos having no ruler

c : a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchy
 
If you read the rest of this thread you will see that I want less police and less laws, but some people run around demanding that we should have none.

The answer to your question depends on your exact location in this continent wide nation, some places are others are not.

Yes, I read the whole thread and your responses...I don't abandon threads and, since I was able to post this in GP and not in the dungeon, it's nice to actually get some responses and to talk about this.

In the areas that are not, which are those and why?
 
I have.

Many times.

Anarchy, in its most strict sense, is a state of existence in which there are no rulers.

Origin and Etymology of anarchy:

Medieval Latin anarchia, from Greek, from anarchos having no ruler

c : a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchy
Utopian Means fantasy.
b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority the city's descent into anarchy
 
Yes, I read the whole thread and your responses...I don't abandon threads and, since I was able to post this in GP and not in the dungeon, it's nice to actually get some responses and to talk about this.

In the areas that are not, which are those and why?

They are the areas with less police and less laws, generally they have lower populations and tend towards the conservative end of politics, this description also explains th why.
 
Utopian Means fantasy.
b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority the city's descent into anarchy

Heavier than air flight was generally regarded as utopian fantasy.

Until it wasn't.

Don't you want a world where you are accountable to, and must comply with, no man but yourself?
 
They are the areas with less police and less laws, generally they have lower populations and tend towards the conservative end of politics, this description also explains th why.

So, areas with less police and less laws are more free?

In other words, less government = more freedom.
 
Back
Top