In now viral "tweet" actor Laurence Fox burns fagg flags

[Anti Federalist]

Laurence Fox Defends Burning ‘Child Mutilation’ LGBTQ+ Progress Pride Flag

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/20...g-child-mutilation-lgbtq-progress-pride-flag/

KURT ZINDULKA 19 Jun 2023

Reclaim Party leader Laurence Fox has defended burning several LGBTQ+ ‘Progress Pride’ flags in his back garden, saying that the flag represents “child mutilation” and stands against “biological reality” and “objective truth”.

British actor turned anti-woke campaigner Laurence Fox refused to stand down following social media outrage over a video of him burning several “Progress Pride” flags over the weekend. The video, which went viral on Twitter, was picked up in the legacy media, with multiple reports highlighting the “outrage” against the act.

However, the My Son Hunter star said that he would not be deterred by social media “pile ons”.

“I will always stand for biological reality, objective truth and the protection of vulnerable and confused children against those who would do their bodies irreversible harm,” the Reclaim Party leader said.

“No one served under this child mutilation flag. No one fought under it. It’s a concocted piece of political artifice. It divides people down sexual and skin colour lines. It is antithetical to what a national flag represents. A national flag represents the values of a nation. This migraine flag represents an ideology,” Fox continued.

“I stand against everything this so called ‘progressive’ pride flag, which preaches inclusion, but not of all people stands for. It claims to stand for diversity, but hates diversity of opinion. It stands for equity, which is communism and forced equality. Dragging us all down to the lowest common denominator. I loathe what it represents. Especially since it has hijacked hard fought for gay and lesbian rights to push through its altogether more sinister objective.

“So if you think that a few mean tweets will stop me. Think again.”

In a separate video, Fox said that the so-called Progress Pride flag has “nothing to do” with the original rainbow pride flag, which he said represents the “hard fought for gay and lesbian rights” that “everybody” would support.

Fox went on to say that the United Kingdom already has a flag that “unites everyone: gay, straight, lesbian, white, black, yellow, red, green, thin and fat… It’s called the Union Jack and it represents us all, and it represents secular liberal democracy.”

The criticism of Fox stands in contrast to other footage claimed to have been recorded this month, of the national Union Flag being disrespectfully dropped on the ground by government workmen as they were replaced with rows of “Intersex-Inclusive Progress Pride Flag”. While not generally grabbing headlines, the video was picked up by Talk TV’s Piers Morgan, who said of it:” The rainbow flag has been posted over London’s Regent Street in place of the Union Jack… is Pride month more important than patriotism?”.

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1670493686000410624

https://twitter.com/i/status/1668389294128463872

 

[RJB]

I have never seen a country's flag treated with such disrespect by government workers. You're not supposed to even let it touch the ground let alone throw it on the ground. I do have a tendency to roll my eyes when big talkers like Sean Hannity from the safety of his desk gush over a flag as they send others to die for it, but in the scheme of things, Brits have more to be proud of from what the Union Jack represents of their past than what that other flag bodes for their future. The Union Jack is one of the "Four Olds" that must be destroyed for the NWO.

 

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1668389294128463872

"Just following orders"

 

[Occam's Banana]

“I stand against everything this so called ‘progressive’ pride flag, which preaches inclusion, but not of all people stands for. It claims to stand for diversity, but hates diversity of opinion. It stands for equity, which is communism and forced equality. Dragging us all down to the lowest common denominator. I loathe what it represents. Especially since it has hijacked hard fought for gay and lesbian rights to push through its altogether more sinister objective.

↓↓↓

Three Terms Communists Redefined to Subvert Society
https://newdiscourses.com/2022/09/three-terms-communists-redefined-to-subvert-society/
James Lindsay (01 September 2022)

[...]

1. Inclusion

Of all the words the Woke Marxists strategically misuse today, few are more important than “inclusion.” Many people have awakened to the sense that something is badly wrong with that term and that it somehow indicates selective exclusion, and they’re right. Now that you know the trick, it’s easy to understand how it works.

To Woke Marxists, inclusion expresses the idea that nobody is excluded by virtue of the unjust power dynamics Woke Marxist Theory describes. For them, free societies with impartial laws don’t address the underlying structural power dynamics that create de facto exclusion or a sense of not being fully welcome. For example, racial and sexual minorities (and especially Woke activists within those groups) might be made to feel excluded, they insist, by virtue of a belief that straight, white men are the “defaults” in many positions of authority. Or, women might be excluded as a matter of circumstantial fact by the demands of motherhood, which quickly and neatly explains many of their views about abortion “rights” and the recently published notion in the New York Times that the maternal instinct is a myth created by men [archive link - OB] — that is, in Marxian terms, an oppressive ideological narrative that supports structural patriarchy.

When huge entities like the World Economic Forum (WEF) and United Nations (UN) say that their agenda is to transform the world to achieve a more sustainable and inclusive future, this is the subversion they’re relying upon. People who Marxist Theory says have been or are being excluded—i.e., for them, Leftists—must be actively included, which requires excluding everyone else, either by limits to occupancy or by deliberate censorship and purges.

[...]

 

[RJB]

"Just following orders"

A red flag with a hammer and sickle wouldn't work, but that's what it represents.