I'm voting Trump for laughs

[cajuncocoa]

but the real racists say and sing about it all the time.

Both are "real" racists.

 

[tod evans]

Both are "real" racists.

The answer to racism isn't government...........In any form.

 

[cajuncocoa]

The answer to racism isn't government...........In any form.

You'll never catch me saying it is.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

Lets' check out The Trumpster's presidential referrals...

The Obama is against Trump... Check
The Media is against Trump... Check
The establishment Democrats are against Trump... Check
The establishment Republicans Are against Trump... Check
The Pope is against Trump... Check
The UN is against Trump... Check
The EU is against Trump... Check
China is against Trump... Check
Mexico is against Trump... Check
Hateful, Racist, Violent Liberals against Trump... Check

Best qualifications Ever!!

Bonuses points!!
Cher says she will leave the country...
Cyrus says she will leave the country...
Whoopi says she will leave the country...
Rosi says she will leave the country...
Sharpton says he will leave the country...

My Vote for Trump... Check
Perfect...

Great post about the practical aspects of supporting, if not voting for, the Trump phenomenon.

 

[otherone]

Trump is many things, but I doubt he is an idiot.

-assclown
-fraud
-media whore
-narcissist
-demagogue
-pied piper for retards
-idiot
-douchebag
-hypocrite
-liberal
-sell out
-insider

Anything else to strike from the list?

 

[speciallyblend]

trump supporters are just the new blinded obama voters, trump is for universal healthcare, you might as well call yourself liberal progressives, trump is hillary with a dick(phallus), trump voters are just as blind as obama voters. suckers!!!

 

[speciallyblend]

-assclown
-fraud
-media whore
-narcissist
-demagogue
-pied piper for retards
-idiot
-douchebag
-hypocrite
-liberal
-sell out
-insider

Anything else to strike from the list?

trumps policies are hillary with a dick(phallus). no need to strike that one off the list. trump is a liberal progressive establishment candidate proving that trump supporters are just as blinded as bush/obama voters. universal healthcare. glad trump is paying or it, ooo nevermind i mean we will be forced to as trump cannot balance a budget just like the rest of the failed gop and hillary. trump supporters are fools like obama voters. no different just angry voters wanting bigger government. trump is that.

 

[speciallyblend]

Great post about the practical aspects of supporting, if not voting for, the Trump phenomenon.

funny part is trump is establishment, just people are blind, reminds me of a white obama , making suckers out of people. this country deserves an establishment trump/hillary ticket for the blind masses.

 

[speciallyblend]

A sane post.

a gamble just like obama, sure to get screwed the guy supports universal healthcare and be damned we will pay for it. trump is establishment, people are just blinded by the white obamas hope.

 

[osan]

-assclown
-fraud
-media whore
-narcissist
-demagogue
-pied piper for retards
-idiot
-douchebag
-hypocrite
-liberal
-sell out
-insider

Anything else to strike from the list?

D00d, come on... this is a child's response. Or did I miss the intention of humor?

Assuming not, where is the proof of fraud?

Media whore? Meh... maybe, but no more than any of the others, and given the current practical nature of the game, how can you hold that against him?

Narcissist? Do you even know what such a diagnosis entails? I see little evidence of this. Obama is a case of extreme clinical narcissism. Trump is decidedly not. But if you have evidence I have not seen, then please and by all means present it. I am willing to cede the point if you can make it convincingly.

Demagogue? Once again I have to call bullshit on this. Stalin and Mao were demagogues. The truest sense of the term connotes someone who is really a bad person. Trump has yet to prove himself that way, and it may well come if he is elected. But as of this moment, I see no evidence that this is the case.

Pied Piper? Firstly, I am not even sure what you mean by that, exactly. But if I work with certain perhaps reasonable assumptions, then I ask once again how is he any worse than the others? Or is it your contention that one or more of the rest are not "pied pipers"? By a certain set of assumptions, I could reasonably assert that virtually all politicians are pipers. After all, when was the last time you ran into one that said "do NOT follow me or listen to a word I say"?

Douchebag. OK, that's a matter of pure opinion, and I may end up agreeing with you on that point before all is said and done. But what relevance has this point to this capacity as president? Clinton Willy is a world-class douche, as is his lesbo wife, the Shrubs, Cruz, Rubio, and so on down the miserable line. Everyone is likely a douchebag in the eyes of at least one other human being on the planet. I see no relevance there, whatsoever.

Hypocrite? Can you cite instances of his hypocrisy and how they are relevant to the role of president, as well as how he is any worse than any of the other candidates of either party?

Liberal. Please offer your proof. Chumming w/liberals is not even evidence, much less proof - so please don't waste time going there. Contributing to liberal candidates is also no evidence, given the nature of the contribution game and the reasons people in business tend to give money. Even past self-ID as a "liberal" is no proof. People do alter their positions.

Sell out? Please define the term and then offer your evidence. Mere opinion counts for nothing in such discussions. To whom did he sell out? At what price? What did he abandon? Why?

Insider? Once again, provide a rigorous definition of the term as you employ it here and offer up your evidence. He is an insider at his own company, so I don't suppose you mean that. Are you asserting that he is an "establishment" insider? Define THAT. Even without definitions, what is your evidence? What you are saying implies that all the conniptions we are witnessing nation- and in a lesser way world-wide are all staged. Do you really believe this? Even MY epically paranoid mind finds that one a bit too bulky to swallow. But if you have a well reasoned basis for it, please share because I admire astute observation and analysis, even when it leads to places I do not like.

I don't suppose it was really worth the effort to address these accusations, but I guess I just got curious as to your basis for holding your views. I suspect it is mere "I don't like the bastard", but am always willing to give one the opportunity to prove me wrong.

Well?

 

[erowe1]

Assuming not, where is the proof of fraud?

Seriously?

 

[otherone]

D00d, come on... this is a child's response. Or did I miss the intention of humor?

Assuming not, where is the proof of fraud?

Media whore? Meh... maybe, but no more than any of the others, and given the current practical nature of the game, how can you hold that against him?

Narcissist? Do you even know what such a diagnosis entails? I see little evidence of this. Obama is a case of extreme clinical narcissism. Trump is decidedly not. But if you have evidence I have not seen, then please and by all means present it. I am willing to cede the point if you can make it convincingly.

Demagogue? Once again I have to call bull$#@! on this. Stalin and Mao were demagogues. The truest sense of the term connotes someone who is really a bad person. Trump has yet to prove himself that way, and it may well come if he is elected. But as of this moment, I see no evidence that this is the case.

Pied Piper? Firstly, I am not even sure what you mean by that, exactly. But if I work with certain perhaps reasonable assumptions, then I ask once again how is he any worse than the others? Or is it your contention that one or more of the rest are not "pied pipers"? By a certain set of assumptions, I could reasonably assert that virtually all politicians are pipers. After all, when was the last time you ran into one that said "do NOT follow me or listen to a word I say"?

Douchebag. OK, that's a matter of pure opinion, and I may end up agreeing with you on that point before all is said and done. But what relevance has this point to this capacity as president? Clinton Willy is a world-class douche, as is his lesbo wife, the Shrubs, Cruz, Rubio, and so on down the miserable line. Everyone is likely a douchebag in the eyes of at least one other human being on the planet. I see no relevance there, whatsoever.

Hypocrite? Can you cite instances of his hypocrisy and how they are relevant to the role of president, as well as how he is any worse than any of the other candidates of either party?

Liberal. Please offer your proof. Chumming w/liberals is not even evidence, much less proof - so please don't waste time going there. Contributing to liberal candidates is also no evidence, given the nature of the contribution game and the reasons people in business tend to give money. Even past self-ID as a "liberal" is no proof. People do alter their positions.

Sell out? Please define the term and then offer your evidence. Mere opinion counts for nothing in such discussions. To whom did he sell out? At what price? What did he abandon? Why?

Insider? Once again, provide a rigorous definition of the term as you employ it here and offer up your evidence. He is an insider at his own company, so I don't suppose you mean that. Are you asserting that he is an "establishment" insider? Define THAT. Even without definitions, what is your evidence? What you are saying implies that all the conniptions we are witnessing nation- and in a lesser way world-wide are all staged. Do you really believe this? Even MY epically paranoid mind finds that one a bit too bulky to swallow. But if you have a well reasoned basis for it, please share because I admire astute observation and analysis, even when it leads to places I do not like.

I don't suppose it was really worth the effort to address these accusations, but I guess I just got curious as to your basis for holding your views. I suspect it is mere "I don't like the bastard", but am always willing to give one the opportunity to prove me wrong.

Well?

My claim was "Pied piper for Retards". What could Trump do or not do at this point that would cause his supporters to not vote for him? How about you? What opinion or claim or action would make you not vote for him?

 

[heavenlyboy34]

-assclown
-fraud
-media whore
-narcissist
-demagogue
-pied piper for retards
-idiot
-douchebag
-hypocrite
-liberal
-sell out
-insider

Anything else to strike from the list?

He's more fascist than liberal, IMO.

 

[Mach]

a gamble just like obama, sure to get screwed the guy supports universal healthcare and be damned we will pay for it. trump is establishment, people are just blinded by the white obamas hope.

Again, who else are you going to vote for that you're not going to get all of that, all of you keep concentrating on who not to vote for, but never who to vote for, because there is no one else.

A bunch of bickering over, zero choices.

It's getting to the point of downright hate.

 

[bubbleboy]

This is not about Donald Trump. THIS IS THE REVOLUTION

 

[osan]

My claim was "Pied piper for Retards". What could Trump do or not do at this point that would cause his supporters to not vote for him? How about you? What opinion or claim or action would make you not vote for him?

I didn't say I was GOING to vote for him. I may not vote for anyone... what's the point? The OP posited the notion that IF you were going to vote, go for Trump for the reasons I cited. If you don't want to, fine by me. I don't give a damn who votes for whom. That's personal business. But for the umpteenth time I will repeat the question: who would be better? Who is a more unknown quantity? I know Hillary want to put her giant 11" schwanz in my boot, sans the courtesy of K-Y. Same with the rest.

Anyhow, this has all gone pointless. Vote. Don't vote. Write in Hitler or Caligula if it pleases. I don't think any of this is going to make the least fundamental difference at the end of the day. We as a nation are almost certain to fail to do what must be done to make things even remotely resembling a free land. Therefore, my best recommendation is to pre-lube your sphincter in anticipation of that which is most likely to be in your not distant future.

Oh, and the strikeout thing. Is that supposed to mean something?

 

[otherone]

Therefore, my best recommendation is to pre-lube your sphincter in anticipation of that which is most likely to be in your not distant future.

That was my point. Believing that the Cult of Orange will do anything but exacerbate what's happening is asinine, for the reasons that you so eloquently chose to dismiss.

 

[osan]

He's more fascist than liberal, IMO.

On what do you base this? It may be true, but at least offer up some plausible reasoning. I don't think any of us know enough about Trump-as-politician to make such an evaluation in anything but questionable ways. He's new to this game and the things he says are marks of his well known showmanship. He's playing the game as a shrewd non-politician would, IMO. There's nothing to suggest that he, of necessity, will be anything like his campaign persona, if elected president.

Just look at Obama. His campaign persona and that of the president are not very much alike at all. His douche-factor went up by ten orders of magnitude and grew from that point onward. He's now the Infini-Douche. Seems to me all these bastards change markedly the moment they sit in The Chair. I fully expect Trump to be the next ultra-douche, but I cannot say for sure that it will happen... at least not beyond 99%... and given how bad things are, 1% is looking pretty damned good.

I, for one, will likely stay home. Gas is too expensive to burn on so grossly lopsided a statistical likelihood that my sphincter will be getting some heavy exercise in 2016. no matter whom I choose. I'd rather spend the cash on beer. Or ammo.

 

[osan]

That was my point. Believing that the Cult of Orange will do anything but exacerbate what's happening is asinine, for the reasons that you so eloquently chose to dismiss.

Perhaps we are speaking past each other... dunno. You seemed to raise objections to Trump and all I did was ask for some supporting evidence. I didn't dismiss anything - rather, I asked for some help in understanding you. You made statements about him without demonstrating basis and that was all I was interested in seeing so I could evaluate and see whether my own position needed adjustment. As I said, I don't trust Trump to the door, but I remain skeptical about him because I have no sufficient basis for judging him one way or another. He is the only candidate for whom I can say this. Does that make any sense to you?

 

[otherone]

Perhaps we are speaking past each other... dunno. You seemed to raise objections to Trump and all I did was ask for some supporting evidence. I didn't dismiss anything - rather, I asked for some help in understanding you. You made statements about him without demonstrating basis and that was all I was interested in seeing so I could evaluate and see whether my own position needed adjustment. As I said, I don't trust Trump to the door, but I remain skeptical about him because I have no sufficient basis for judging him one way or another. He is the only candidate for whom I can say this. Does that make any sense to you?

I have no reason to believe that Trump politically will be any different than Trump the Media Whore we've come to know and revile for the last 30 years.
Why bother evaluating a list that starts with "assclown"?