I'm so disappointed after reading the constitutional amendment thread

Sematary

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
6,428
I can't believe what my eyes have beheld. The proposals I saw were not only worthy of constitutional amendment for the most part but smacked so badly of big government getting it's nose into shit it doesn't belong in that I was read to puke. WE are supposed to be the agents of change in this revolution. The only thing that people, apparently, want to change, is the rules to benefit them.

The constitution is there to protect our rights - not be used to settle personal vendettas and certainly to to "outlaw" anything. They tried that little trick with prohibition and it failed miserably.

What can the future of our movement be if people don't understand the principles which are to guide us - namely, LESS GOVERNMENT, not more and personal liberty.
 
I noticed that too. Some very piss poor amendments were offered up.
 
I'm with you 100%, after reading the first few, I had to quit before I started hurling chunks all over my keyboard.

It's wonderful that Dr. Paul has attracted a diverse group of supporters, but I'm amazed at how many still don't understand the message is about FREEDOM!

I see discussions about "alternative" tax plans (better excuses for theft don't change the fact that it's theft). I see calls to use the government to fix the problems with the MSM. I even see threads calling for making a Socialist gun-grabber the VP candidate because he's "honest" and "supports the Constitution."

Sometimes I think it's better to let it all go, and spend my money on gold and ammo instead of wasting time trying to convince people to quit thinking like sheeple and start thinking like men.
 

heh, it's certainly a big tent.

It's human nature and basic game theory. The freedom game breaks down because whenever there is a possibility that freedom can be removed from one group or another, each group will rush to be the one that preserves their freedom the most...even if everyone is less free by comparison.

In an ideal world, all factions would cooperate and see that if they all just resist the urge to sieze power, then everything would be better for all. But all these groups know that if one of the others siezes power, they are significantly worse off. It is foolish to just hope the others are intelligent and trust them...so each makes a grab at the power.

The founding fathers did their best to remove these mechanisms so nobody would be tempted, but over time, Americans have recreated them, and they always will, because they fear that somebody else will if they don't.
 
With the risk of being Flamed:

I can see your point .. however I think the thread is good
Why?? It allows for communication of thoughts & feelings that have brought us all together.

This might allow for release of years of frustration and the overwhelming sense of resentment. People want to be heard,acknowledged and feel like they matter.
 
The Original Constitution should stand as is......we need no *&^%*&$% amendments. PERIOD!!
 
I'm with you 100%, after reading the first few, I had to quit before I started hurling chunks all over my keyboard.

It's wonderful that Dr. Paul has attracted a diverse group of supporters, but I'm amazed at how many still don't understand the message is about FREEDOM!

I see discussions about "alternative" tax plans (better excuses for theft don't change the fact that it's theft). I see calls to use the government to fix the problems with the MSM. I even see threads calling for making a Socialist gun-grabber the VP candidate because he's "honest" and "supports the Constitution."

Sometimes I think it's better to let it all go, and spend my money on gold and ammo instead of wasting time trying to convince people to quit thinking like sheeple and start thinking like men.

Traveler: What is your definition of discussion? I am all but incensed of your post, since I am left with the impression that it was directed to me. There was no sound discussion from your part; just a blatant dismissal. You can feel free to Apologize Like a "MAN" or Not.

Attention Grassroots Members: What Traveler might be referring to is a posting I put up at 2am in the Economic Section in regards to a "Website" that I found while searching for more information about Monetary & Fiscal Policy's. That is a topic that is important to me.(they are all important)I found this to be of great interest since it (NASARA) apparently has been discussed in DC for 11years.

It is a topic that is about working toward solutions and collectively as a group I thought it be worthy since Sound Money is a specialty of Dr Ron Paul.

Thoughts?
 
65,000 a year period.

I say anyone to be elected to any federal or state position of power should have to live as an average person for minimum of five years on an average salary of not more than 65,000 a year period. :mad:
 
we're all at some point in the spectrum between complete sheep and fully aware. don't get too discouraged -- not everyone is fully aware yet!

(me included, please help)
 
we're all at some point in the spectrum between complete sheep and fully aware. don't get too discouraged -- not everyone is fully aware yet!

(me included, please help)
Lesson #1, the United States Supreme Court, the United States District Court, the United States Attorney General - who's courts are those? Who owns them?

United States citizens - who's citizens are those? Who owns them?

So what do you want to be now?
 
I say anyone to be elected to any federal or state position of power should have to live as an average person for minimum of five years on an average salary of not more than 65,000 a year period. :mad:

:eek: wth..... taking away rights from certain people? Yes things like this is the stuff we are actually fighting...
 
Back
Top