I'm noticing a trend here never seen before Computer Voting

[Ex Post Facto]

Every candidate is winning in the exact position throughout every county. The same thing happened in California. Nobody does better or worse than they do in any other county.

 

[devil21]

Can you elaborate a little? I saw that mentioned about Cali but Im not following what you are saying.

 

[MozoVote]

I agree the California votes were strange. CA is a complex state, demographically and geographically. It was really weird how consistent the returns were.

 

[MrZach]

Every candidate is winning in the exact position throughout every county. The same thing happened in California. Nobody does better or worse than they do in any other county.

Do you have data from previous elections (pre-computer voting) to back this up as being different?

Don't you think if someone wanted to throw an election with a computer hack that they would make it less obvious and actually try to emulate variance...? Near uniformity, to me anyway, would be a evidence against election fraud - not for it...

 

[Ex Post Facto]

Do you have data from previous elections (pre-computer voting) to back this up as being different?

Don't you think if someone wanted to throw an election with a computer hack that they would make it less obvious and actually try to emulate variance...? Near uniformity, to me anyway, would be a evidence against election fraud - not for it...

The only thing I can find to compare is general election data from 2000. Still looking for primary information, but I did find these:

http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist001.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist002.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist003.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist004.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist005.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist006.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist007.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist008.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist009.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist010.html
http://www2.sbe.state.va.us/web_doc...- President-by-District-Locality-dist011.html

I guess it's comparing apples to oranges in a way...but still suspect of something at work here. Maybe mainstream media influence, idk.

 

[Ruby Justice]

The only thing I can find to compare is general election data from 2000. Still looking for primary information, but I did find this...http://www2.sbe.virginia.gov/web_do...- President-by-District-Locality-dist009.html that shows George Bush lost at least one county during the primaries.

That election was a fraud, too. Also, Huckabee is winning ONE county in the entire state.

 

[dmspilot00]

That election was a fraud, too. Also, Huckabee is winning ONE county in the entire state.

Huckabee is winning more like half the counties in VA.. I don't know where you get "one" from.

 

[ButchHowdy]

I noticed that from 1-11% reporting, Huck's and McCains numbers always added up to 93%

49/44, 48/45, etc.

 

[nate895]

I noticed that from 1-11% reporting, Huck's and McCains numbers always added up to 93%

49/44, 48/45, etc.

That's because of our votes and idiots voted for Romney, today too.