Just think, if we didn't hurry and rush through the bailout, the market would drop! Good thing they did. Oh, my bad, it's dropping anyway.
So now the congress critters can pass a new bill canceling the bailout.
But we all know they won't do that.
Just think, if we didn't hurry and rush through the bailout, the market would drop! Good thing they did. Oh, my bad, it's dropping anyway.
You should read up on some history....and I don't mean it offensively. If anything, this prevents a grassroots revolution. Whenever a crisis like this takes place it's used as a massive power grab for the government...we will be fighting more regulation, intervention, abuse of power, and that's if we are lucky enough to still have some of our civil liberties at the end of this. This is a major setback.
I don't get it; why do you think I'm cheering your father's demise? Or anyone elses for that matter? The collapse of our financial markets in the face of all the government interventions and subsidies is a wonderous thing to behold.
Exactly.
Just look at the expansion of the government under FDR following the first great depression.
And there is nothing to indicate things will be any different this time. We are only in the beginning of the crash and the government already passed this 700b bailout plan. The media is controlled now just as it was a year ago, and TPTB are still able to make the general public believe and support anything that they want. Our sphere of influence is extremely limited.
I'd also like to point out for people that we have no frame of reference AT ALL for how fast the reorganization of the market will take place after the collapse. Historically it has always taken a long time, however, THIS time for the first time we have a fast, well connected economy with computers in the mix. Communication happens so much faster these days than ever before. This will have an effect on the market. I think it means we will fall faster, but bounce back faster as well.
Just take Ron's campaign as an example. Something like that would have been impossible to organize so quickly without modern communications. You can pat yourselves on the back for the amount of time Ron has been getting in the media these days. The market will be no different. People can use these tools independently to organize their communities and local economies as well.
You don't have any evidence to show it will be fast. You do not know what you are talking about. They've already introduced more government intervention, and that always slows down a recovery. Ron even said it himself....before that bill passed he said it would "Guarantee" a 10 year depression! That's not to be taken lightly!
All I'm saying is that whatever happens, the time scale will be compressed because of modern communications. I've watched it happen all my life in every single industry ever touched by computing and communications technology. The market will be no different. If Ron says a 10 year depression, communications will reduce that by a substantial amount. My own guess would be 2-3 years but I've no basis for that other than what I've seen happen in other industries. The only thing I can say for sure is that it will make a visible difference, and you'll be reading articles about it when people begin to study these times after we're through it all.
Go back and read my other posts. You deserve every harsh word you get, buddy. You're not immune from a collapse, and most of the posts cheering a total failure are from little kids who live with their parents. Get a grip.
You should read up on some history....and I don't mean it offensively. If anything, this prevents a grassroots revolution. Whenever a crisis like this takes place it's used as a massive power grab for the government...we will be fighting more regulation, intervention, abuse of power, and that's if we are lucky enough to still have some of our civil liberties at the end of this. This is a major setback.
It has nothing to do with communications and everything to do with government intervention. You are talking nonsense with nothing to back it up.
It's like a drug addict. We have to hit bottom before it will turn around. Very few addicts decide to change before they hit bottom, whatever their individual bottom is.
First you have to decide whether an economic collapse is necessary for a grassroots revolution to take place. I think it is. Second you have to look at it strategically. In my opinion, the longer the collapse takes place, the more the enemy (current system operators) have to organize and supress a grassroots revolution. Conversely, the faster it happens, the easier it will be for grassroots organization to happen, and the less chance that the tools they would use (internet and other communication systems like phones) will be adversely affected.
So I am rooting for a hard and fast crash.
As far as people suffering goes. Big whip. A million Iraqi's dead after countless others starved to death with sanctions. America consuming 80% of worlds savings to keep its epitome-of-malinvestment-insane-consumer-economy pumping away. Dead Vietnamese for no reason. Dead troops for no reason. Carcinogens in the food and water. Government financed drug war that benefits both government and drug cartels. Africa starving to death. IMF propping up ruthless dictatorial regimes. The list goes on and on.
So while blindly wishing for disaster may be childish. Please don't bloviate about Americans and their ill-gotten 401k's and their college fund. War always comes home. And American's have been far to complicit and enabling as a whole and don't deserve any more or less than the starving Africans.
We need to right the system. The faster the better.
Then you are a fucking moron. A market crash is not good for anyone. You should be hoping and praying we make it out of this with some sort of positive.