Illegal Immigrants are NOT Eligible for ANY Federal Benefits

Send the mother home. Then she won't be torn between the baby and work. Instead, she can be torn between taking her baby back with her.

Ron Paul would disagree.

http://www.ontheissues.org/TX/Ron_Paul_Immigration.htm

Sending 12M illegals home won't & shouldn't happen

Even with a healthy economy and stricter border controls, the issue of what to do with twelve-million-plus illegals already here would persist. One side says use the U.S. Army, round them up, and ship them home. The other side says give them amnesty, make them full-fledged citizens, and reward the lawbreakers, thus insulting and unfairly penalizing those who have patiently waited and obeyed our immigration laws. The first choice--sending twelve to fifteen million illegals home--isn't going to happen and should not happen. Neither the determination or the ability to accomplish it exists. Besides, if each case is looked at separately, we would find ourselves splitting up families and deporting some who have lived here for decades, if not their entire life, and who never lived for any length of time in Mexico.
 
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/feb/01/news/la-pn-ron-paul-nevada-latino-forum-20120201

The 12-term Texas congressman spent the better part of a 25-minute address thinking aloud about the thorny subject. He talked about how Americans are more accepting of outsiders when the economy is good, but when trouble looms there is a search for scapegoats.

"I believe Hispanics have been used as scapegoats, to say, they're the problem instead of being a symptom maybe of a problem with the welfare state," Paul told the group. "In Nazi Germany they had to have scapegoats to blame and they turned on the Jews.

"Now there's a lot of antagonism and resentment turned just automatically on immigrants," he continued. "You say, no not immigrants, it's just illegal immigrants. I do believe in legal immigration. I want to have a provision to obey those laws. You have to understand this in the context of the economy."

Paul said he's not one of those politicians who believes that "barbed-wire fences and guns on our border will solve any of our problems." That's not, he said, the American way. And he doesn't think that a national identification card is the way to go.

What the country does need, he said, is "a much better immigration service" fed by more resources. Not that he'd "vote for extra money." But he does, he told the crowd, have a plan.

If the problem is welfare, go after the welfare program. Having zero illegal immigrants does nothing to address that.

FT_15.07.23_UnauthImmigrants.png


There were 11.3 million unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. in 2014. The population has remained essentially stable for five years, and currently makes up 3.5% of the nation’s population. The number of unauthorized immigrants peaked in 2007 at 12.2 million, when this group was 4% of the U.S. population.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/19/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/
 
Last edited:

I understand how Paul feels. I also know that he tried, unsuccessfully, to get the Constitution amended so that illegally born babies would not automatically qualify for citizenship. Here is one of his official campaign ads.

He is on record stating that you cannot have a nation without borders. He is the person who taught me that the people at the ratifying convention stated on the record that "obviously" it would not apply to people who were here illegally.
 
Last edited:
I understand how Paul feels. I also know that he tried, unsuccessfully, to get the Constitution amended so that illegally born babies would not automatically qualify for citizenship. Here is one of his official campaign ads.

He is on record stating that you cannot have a nation without borders. He is the person who taught me that the people at the ratifying convention stated on the record that "obviously" it would not apply to people who were here illegally.


He also said:

Paul said he's not one of those politicians who believes that "barbed-wire fences and guns on our border will solve any of our problems." That's not, he said, the American way. And he doesn't think that a national identification card is the way to go.

http://nation.foxnews.com/ron-paul/2011/09/07/ron-paul-border-fence-will-be-used-keep-us

Rep. Ron Paul has a problem with the idea of a U.S. border fence.

“The people that want big fences and guns, sure, we could secure the border,” the congressman noted. “A barbed wire fence with machine guns, that would do the trick. I don’t believe that is what America is all about.”

“Every time you think about this toughness on the border and ID cards and REAL IDs, think it’s a penalty against the American people too. I think this fence business is designed and may well be used against us and keep us in. In economic turmoil, the people want to leave with their capital and there’s capital controls and there’s people controls. Every time you think about the fence, think about the fences being used against us, keeping us in.”
 
Last edited:
So basically Paul did not have any solution. Sucks to be him.

I have done a 180 on this issue. Send them home. Every single one of them. If they get caught twice, then they can go to prison before they go home.

If you're trying to appeal to the anti-authoritarian in me, this is the one issue that won't work with. They are a problem, and it needs to be solved. There's no perfect solution, but at this point I'll settle for any solution that does not involve making them citizens.
 
Last edited:
So basically Paul did not have any solution.

Ron absolutely has a solution.

ZERO GOVT BENEFITS for non-citizens, no school, no medical, no food, no shelters, nothing
apply for benefits? GTFO
commit violent crime? GTFO

Ron's solution is simple.

Want to come to US and not be a citizen? Get a free market sponsor to cover your needs.
 
Ron absolutely has a solution.

ZERO GOVT BENEFITS for non-citizens, no school, no medical, no food, no shelters, nothing
apply for benefits? GTFO
commit violent crime? GTFO

Ron's solution is simple.

Want to come to US and not be a citizen? Get a free market sponsor to cover your needs.

Also, stop bombing or meddling with foreign countries.Then maybe you won't have mass immigration.
 
Cash benefits to an illegal immigrant with no children who are US citizens? Not likely. Most everything else, ya.
 
Who funds public schools? http://blogs.census.gov/2012/06/21/...schools-get-their-money-how-do-they-spend-it/

Based on these figures, the Federal Government provides about ten percent.

Revenues for our nation’s public elementary-secondary school systems come primarily from local government sources of revenue (when combined) for a total of $261.4 billion in fiscal year 2010. When revenue sources are looked at independently, state sources to schools of formula assistance monies ($176.6 billion) are the largest single source of funding followed closely by local government receipts of property tax monies ($169.4 billion).

CB12-113-PublicEdFinancesGraph.jpg
 
Last edited:
A letter to school districts will go out Friday, adding to a highly charged debate over transgender rights in the middle of the administration’s legal fight with North Carolina over the issue. The declaration — signed by Justice and Education department officials — will describe what schools should do to ensure that none of their students are discriminated against.

It does not have the force of law, but it contains an implicit threat: Schools that do not abide by the Obama administration’s interpretation of the law could face lawsuits or a loss of federal aid.


Link
 
Yes, most public schools do get some Federal money. But how much is actually from the Federal government? Another source:

http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Policies/Money-matters-At-a-glance

The federal government is not the biggest contributor. On average, federal funds currently make up approximately 9 percent of a school district’s budget. Individual states and local school districts add the rest. How much each state and district provides varies from state-to-state (U.S. Department of Education, 2007).
 
Back
Top