Cleaner44
Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2007
- Messages
- 9,348
No, that's nonsense. You are one of the most statist people I can ever find. Who would build the schools that you graduated(?) from!
Muh roads!
No, that's nonsense. You are one of the most statist people I can ever find. Who would build the schools that you graduated(?) from!
OK, I'll bite...tell me how.
I have been yelling NO PROPERTY TAX for primary residence anywhere in the US
for over 15 years , being charged property tax on your home is literally renting
from the government.
Anyone that doubts this, stop paying the government's property tax and see
how long it takes them to evict you from your home.
Tax everything , as you already do, but gtfo of our homes.
I know, crazy right?
The interesting thing how the tax is determined. There's all sorts of assessment schemes that make baseball rules look straight forward.
Once their assessment scheme determines the value of your home, they tax you accordingly, and then apply your tax dollars to things that have nothing to do with your residence or the burden you put on the government. For example, if you add another room to your house, and the value goes up, you are taxed more - even if your occupancy stays the same, with the same number of cars, the same consumers of water, the same refuse disposal, the same land ownership...
Meanwhile, I can have 10 fking kids in the same 1 room house, and there's no tax increase. I'm effectively putting additional road/resource/education/police burdens on society with my 10 offspring, yet without consequence.
Also, what if I choose to opt out of a government service (i.e. government education). If I homeschool or send my children to private school, my taxes dont go down. In fact, I'll have to pay a fee to allow my children access to the government school gym - even though I pay the tax to maintain the government school.
If I'm retired in IL, or I run a church, I dont have to pay the same property tax. Again - WTF? My household is a not-for-profit. We live there, I make a living to support my household - my income is equal exchange for the labor/service I provide - there is no profit?
Its a "free country" - free healthcare, free education, free government services, free roads. A "free country" doesn't come free ya know - ask the tax payers.
The whole premise of immigration restrictionism is that all the land within the borders of the USA is the property of the federal government. We who ostensibly own our properties are really just squatters who have no right to decide for ourselves whom we want to welcome onto it or sell it to. That's for the feds to decide.
The whole premise of immigration restrictionism is that all the land within the borders of the USA is the property of the federal government. We who ostensibly own our properties are really just squatters who have no right to decide for ourselves whom we want to welcome onto it or sell it to. That's for the feds to decide.
The whole premise of immigration restrictionism is that all the land within the borders of the USA is the property of the federal government. We who ostensibly own our properties are really just squatters who have no right to decide for ourselves whom we want to welcome onto it or sell it to. That's for the feds to decide.
Sure you do.
Just sign form I-864 and bring as many into your home as wish.
I wonder how many Christian Collapsatarians have done that?
The whole premise of immigration restrictionism is that all the land within the borders of the USA is the property of the federal government. We who ostensibly own our properties are really just squatters who have no right to decide for ourselves whom we want to welcome onto it or sell it to. That's for the feds to decide.
No, it is “providing for the common defense”.
Maybe it would be a creative solution to move out and write the deed over to the mayor. She would suddenly be in the hole for a truckload of money. If several people did that...
Yes. Another $4.6 Billion additional. We losertarians scream hip hip hooray. Keep those invitations coming, the loss of liberty is indeed "for the common defense". MIC loves that line "for the common defense".
You are EQUATING pro right to travel freely, pro private/business property and contract rights, anti government solutions to government created problems, with collapsatarian losertarian standing in line with cases of I-864 forms handing them out like candy.
Whose side are you really on? Because you sure as hell are not on my side, expecting government to fix my problems by further restricting my rights and taxing me to death. Certainly when you know that it is the military contractors who are turning their attention from overseas to domestic.
Every presidency republican and democrat has its own "crisis". I am not a betting man but I would bet 10 to 1 if everything government ever said was completely ignored, most of the problems would vanish.
Yes. Another $4.6 Billion additional. We losertarians scream hip hip hooray. Keep those invitations coming, the loss of liberty is indeed "for the common defense". MIC loves that line "for the common defense".
Ron Paul always makes a point of distinguishing between true “defense” and global militarism. The MIC is a global entity.
The writers of the Constitution thought “common defense” worth explicitly agreeing upon and including. Yeah, that means nothing to anarchists.
Nope, territory is not the same as property.But is this not exactly what you support? At least when it comes to immigration policy.
Northrop Grumman has been confirmed as the winner of a three-and-a-half year, $95 million contract to develop the first two increments of a new biometric identification system for the Homeland Security Department.
They would collect far more and probably end up killing us.If we don't collect taxes to provide for a common defense, our country would be invaded by people who want to collect taxes from us, and that would be bad.