If we win Iowa will they finally utter that forbidden word:

[Joe3113]

He IS the frontrunner. He has been the front runner since Nov 5th 2007

The ONLY obstacle we have is vote fraud.

 

[UziSprayTF]

I would pay one ounce of gold to see the look on Stephanopoulos face if Ron Paul won. F-ing priceless.

-Why are you running?
-Well, to win.
-Thats not going to happen.

PWND! Get that shit ass grin off your face.

 

[Todd]

Me thinks they will never use that word until after he wins in NH as well. There will be alot of "wait and see" until Super Tuesday if he wins the Iowa caucus. IMO.

 

[Todd]

I would pay one ounce of gold to see the look on Stephanopoulos face if Ron Paul won. F-ing priceless.

-Why are you running?
-Well, to win.
-Thats not going to happen.

PWND! Get that shit ass grin off your face.

I would love for him to be called on some news show and interviewed and they say " George...we want to show you a clip about a prediction you made back in September".

 

[VoluntaryMan]

If he wins IA, NH, SC, WY, NV, and MI, they'll call it a "FLUKE." If he then loses FL (the last contest in January), the MSM will declare the Ron Paul Revolution "OVER."

Personally, I believe he has a stronger demographic shot at winning NH, SC, WY, NV, and MI (5 of the 7 January races) than IA, but only expect him to actually win 2 of them -- while finishing strong (2nd and 3rd) in all other contests. I consider that a major victory, especially since no other frontrunner is likely to win more than 2 races. It's probably the best position we could be in going into Super Tuesday, because this scenario keeps the field essentially divided. I'd rather see Dr. Paul emerge as the undisputed frontrunner AFTER Super Tuesday, rather than BEFORE (for strategic reasons).

 

[Delain]

They will never stop cheating us. But it will make it a lot more difficult for them to do so.

+1 Truth

 

[SovereignMN]

If Ron Paul wins tonight they will:

1) Give credit to Paul for getting his supporters out but then qualify it by saying...
2) Iowa caucus isn't important
3) Republicans have low turnout
4) He's hit his ceiling

 

[Cjays]

They might have to at least call him "top tier."

 

[Paul.Bearer.of.Injustice]

Iowa and NH are meaningless media circuses. It's probably better for us to stay under the radar until we take Florida.

 

[Janet0116]

No, they won't call him a front-runner. The downplaying of the Iowa caucus process will begin (if it hasn't already), they will emphasize it was all because of his 'fanatical' supporters, he still hasn't caught fire in national polls, etc etc etc.

 

[Ozwest]

If Ron Paul wins tonight they will:

1) Give credit to Paul for getting his supporters out but then qualify it by saying...
2) Iowa caucus isn't important
3) Republicans have low turnout
4) He's hit his ceiling

If Ron Paul wins tonight we will:

1. Start the process of exposing the media for the charletons that they are.
2. Further illustrate the point that the Republican Party is impudent without Ron Paul and his "buoyant force."
3. Make it clear that in a "general election" Ron Paul will attract Independents and Democrats abundantly.
4. Raise the 23 million dollars requested by campaign headquarters prior to the end of January.
5. Invigorate a lethargic public, awakening them from their slumber, and inspiring them to become politically active.

 

[mosquitobite]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=63551

 

[Focus Liberty]

they would wrather say "he's doing very well" or just about anything other than admit they were wrong... George Stephanopolis on the other hand better find a place to hide his money.

 

[hsmith]

They will just call him a "spoiler"

 

[Ozwest]

The current apathy of the general population, and their "lemming like" faith in governmental and corporate structures is propagated and enhanced by the organized manipulation of informational, educational, and social processes by these very same entities.

Most people are "subliminally" aware of this, and have submitted to the continuous bombardment of their liberties, and have succumbed to self-imposed impudence.

The human spirit is irrepressible, and many of us in this movement have discovered this. We have also discovered that self empowerment is addictive and contageous, and the veneer of tyranny that surrounds us, is easily penetrated.

Do not underestimate the power of liberty!

 

[Voluntaryist]

Top Tier!

 

[Chase]

I'm seriously hoping for a first place win, but I bet that if it happens there will STILL be a sizeable percentage of pundits that claim RP has no chance to win. Democratic pundits will still act like Ron Paul would be the easiest for them to beat, up until the point he takes the nomination and they have to actually fight...

 

[Ozwest]

I'm seriously hoping for a first place win, but I bet that if it happens there will STILL be a sizeable percentage of pundits that claim RP has no chance to win. Democratic pundits will still act like Ron Paul would be the easiest for them to beat, up until the point he takes the nomination and they have to actually fight...

There comes a point, where the "pundits" start to be exposed for the shills they are.

This "tipping point" is closer than you think!

 

[Goldwater Conservative]

No, they will repeatedly go down the list of Iowa winners who failed to capture their party's nomination. Even more than they'd do if Huckabee won. I guarantee it.

Not going to matter, though.

 

[Gorgy]

If Ron Paul wins tonight we will:

1. Start the process of exposing the media for the charletons that they are.
2. Further illustrate the point that the Republican Party is impudent without Ron Paul and his "buoyant force."
3. Make it clear that in a "general election" Ron Paul will attract Independents and Democrats abundantly.
4. Raise the 23 million dollars requested by campaign headquarters prior to the end of January.
5. Invigorate a lethargic public, awakening them from their slumber, and inspiring them to become politically active.

I think you meant "impotent" rather than "impudent," but overall I like your ideas!