If millions of deaths result from the vaccines, will they have the power to do round-ups?

[belian78]

Ooooooh, this is a good one.

Personally, I don't think this current Pope can be trusted. He's a globalist.

So for me, no. I don't pay attention to anything the buffoon says now as it is.

A good one?

 

[TheCount]

Can you give us a single quack that I supposedly believe in?
Have you seen the video with Dr. Robert Malone, who sounds reasonable? Or is he a "quack" because the "fact checkers" tell you?

Depends on your bar for quackery. Is he a quack because he claims to have invented something which was discovered when he was 11 and when he had zero involvement with the proposal or development of mRNA based vaccines, which were primarily written about and patented by others with nothing do with with him?

As the vaccines were emergency approved without proper medical trial nobody really knows how deadly they are. And because the internet and media are censured it's impossible to find out...
So nobody can have any reason to think that the COVID vaccines are less deadly than the virus.

With PCR tests with a 90% false-positive rate, and over 90% of the supposed COVID deaths having serious other causes of deaths, it's obvious that both the number of COVID cases and deaths are inflated.

It doesn't surprise me that you avoid my question completely. You think that the vaccine is deadly (you said so), but when I asked how deadly you only said not less deadly than the virus. Which means that you think that there will be at vastly more vaccine deaths than COVID deaths.

But then you said that the virus cases and deaths are inflated...


Do you think that COVID-19 is deadly?

 

[Ender]

Depends on your bar for quackery. Is he a quack because he claims to have invented something which was discovered when he was 11 and when he had zero involvement with the proposal or development of mRNA based vaccines, which were primarily written about and patented by others with nothing do with with him?




It doesn't surprise me that you avoid my question completely. You think that the vaccine is deadly (you said so), but when I asked how deadly you only said not less deadly than the virus. Which means that you think that there will be at vastly more vaccine deaths than COVID deaths.

But then you said that the virus cases and deaths are inflated...


Do you think that COVID-19 is deadly?

There is no proof that the virus even exists- many deaths, from car accidents to cancer, are being blamed on it.

 

[Cleaner44]

There is no proof that the virus even exists- many deaths, from car accidents to cancer, are being blamed on it.

What do you believe Thomas Massie had?

 

[Firestarter]

It doesn't surprise me that you avoid my question completely. You think that the vaccine is deadly (you said so), but when I asked how deadly you only said not less deadly than the virus. Which means that you think that there will be at vastly more vaccine deaths than COVID deaths.

More bull$hit from @TheCount...
You really don't understand the answer to your question "How deadly are these vaccines, would you say"?
... "because the internet and media are censured it's impossible to find out"?

How deadly are these vaccines, would you say?

What percentage of the vaccinated do you think will die due to the "deadliness" of the vaccines? 10%? 5%? 1%? 0.5%? 0.1%?

As the vaccines were emergency approved without proper medical trial nobody really knows how deadly they are. And because the internet and media are censured it's impossible to find out...
So nobody can have any reason to think that the COVID vaccines are less deadly than the virus.

With PCR tests with a 90% false-positive rate, and over 90% of the supposed COVID deaths having serious other causes of deaths, it's obvious that both the number of COVID cases and deaths are inflated.

 

[belian78]

What do you believe Thomas Massie had?

A seasonal shedding of dead and dying cells, compounded by others' seasonal shedding.

 

[Ender]

What do you believe Thomas Massie had?

COVID: If There Is No Virus, Why Are People Dying?
By Jon Rappoport

Jon Rappoport’s blog

January 30, 2021


Since the beginning of this false pandemic, I’ve been offering compelling evidence that no one has proved SARS-CoV-2 exists.

Then people ask, “So why are all these people dying?”

I have explained that, many times, and in this article I’ll explain it again.

First of all, the whole notion that COVID-19 is one health condition is a lie. COVID IS NOT ONE THING.

This is both the hardest and simplest point to accept and understand.

Don’t reject the existence of the virus and then say, “So what is THE cause of people dying?” There is no ONE CAUSE. There is no one illness. There is no “it.”

By far, the biggest sources of illness we are dealing with are lung conditions: various kinds of pneumonia; flu and flu-like disease; TB; other unnamed lung/respiratory problems.

THESE ARE BEING RELABELED “COVID.” It’s a repackaging scheme. People are dying for those traditional reasons, and their deaths are being called “COVID.”

More here:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/01/jon-rappoport/covid-if-there-is-no-virus-why-are-people-dying/

 

[TheCount]

There is no proof that the virus even exists- many deaths, from car accidents to cancer, are being blamed on it.

I guess when I got q-tips ramrodded up my nose they were testing for car accidents.

 

[Cleaner44]

More here:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/01/jon-rappoport/covid-if-there-is-no-virus-why-are-people-dying/

I don't understand what you are telling me.

Do you think Massie had pneumonia, the flu, TB?

 

[TheCount]

More here:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/01/jon-rappoport/covid-if-there-is-no-virus-why-are-people-dying/

That's like saying "bullets don't kill anyone, deaths from other conditions like internal bleeding and organ failure are being blamed on bullets."




Side note: It's exactly the AIDS denialism argument.

 

[TheCount]

More bull$hit from @TheCount...

This time you avoid even more of what I have to say. We both know why.

You can't give a tiny number for the percentage of vaccine recipients who will die because that undermines the idea of a "vaccine holocaust."

But you also can't give a large number because then it will be breathtakingly obvious to anyone with an IQ above room temperature that nowhere near that many people died.

You really don't understand the answer to your question "How deadly are these vaccines, would you say"?
... "because the internet and media are censured it's impossible to find out"?

If 50 million people die in the US you won't need the internet and the media to find out that it happened.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

More bull$hit from @TheCount...

TheCunt is paid to post here by the Open Society Foundations.. See my signature line on their technique.

 

[DamianTV]

Mostly Elderly First,,
and expect a lot of Dead Babies,,

It is a Eugenic Culling.

Kill off the current babies and sterilize the rest of the population so they cant call it an "abortion" if no babies can be created.

Then its all about "blaming the victim". They will blame the would be mothers for not being able to conceive a baby and say "it most definitely was not the murder vaccine" they are now pushing USE MILITARY FORCE TO FORCIBLY VACCINATE EVERYONE that caused the woman to become sterile. Must be a bad sperm donor? Solution? Have group orgies with hundreds of men.

Demoralization of America continues...

This is it. This is THE MASS CULLING.

 

[Okie RP fan]

A good one?

Yea, are you unfamiliar with the reference? "one" was your question... "It was a good one."

LOL... Yikes.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Dr. Robert Malone sounds credible to me...

The following isn't some rant from an antivaxxer, but the educated opinion of an expert (inventor) on mRNA technology, who goes on to explain that these type of vaccines should have never been approved without proper long-term medical trials (that usually include animal trials for at least 3 years), especially as they're completely new technology that has never been used in vaccines before.

He points out that the "biologically active" spike protein being spread throughout the body is especially troubling, and "very dangerous"...

https://coronanews123.wordpress.com...k-of-long-term-animal-trials-full-transcript/

Pfizer-vaccine-immune-deficiency-cover-up

EM.

Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA tech, is right in speaking out for informed consent and against suppression of any talk of risks and and adverse effects of vax occuring in some cases. As always sunshine and open discussion helps people see things with clarity and make right choices.
For the record, he himself got fully vaccinated with moderna.

As to super fast (warp speed) vax approval, political pressure and threats from a controversial politician was behind that:


Trump WH orders FDA chief to authorize Pfizer vaccine Friday or submit his resignation
White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows on Friday told Stephen Hahn, the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, to submit his resignation if the agency does not clear the nation’s first coronavirus vaccine by day’s end, according to people familiar with the situation who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss what happened.
The threat came on the same day that President Trump tweeted that the FDA is “a big, old, slow turtle” in its handling of vaccines, while exhorting Commissioner Stephen Hahn to “get the dam vaccines out NOW.” He added: “Stop playing games and start saving lives!!!”
(From: Trump decries "Reckless anti-vaccine rhetoric, anti-vaccine conspiracy theories").

 

[belian78]

Yea, are you unfamiliar with the reference? "one" was your question... "It was a good one."

LOL... Yikes.

Well aware of what a question is. Also I'm very familiar insinuation and context, which is why I asked what I did. Why be snarky?

 

[bv3]

Kill off the current babies and sterilize the rest of the population so they cant call it an "abortion" if no babies can be created.

Then its all about "blaming the victim". They will blame the would be mothers for not being able to conceive a baby and say "it most definitely was not the murder vaccine" they are now pushing USE MILITARY FORCE TO FORCIBLY VACCINATE EVERYONE that caused the woman to become sterile. Must be a bad sperm donor? Solution? Have group orgies with hundreds of men.

Demoralization of America continues...

This is it. This is THE MASS CULLING.

The babies and very young would be protected. They can be molded to whatever is expedient. Wouldn't make sense to eliminate them. All needs be is to limit the number of influences on their development, particularly those that might contradict the desires of themme.

 

[DamianTV]

The babies and very young would be protected. They can be molded to whatever is expedient. Wouldn't make sense to eliminate them. All needs be is to limit the number of influences on their development, particularly those that might contradict the desires of themme.

These people have ZERO LIMITS. Kill one baby or murder a BILLION, they feel zero guilt or shame about those they cause harm to. And worse yet, (this is where the brainwashing aspects of their mental illness come into play) they do so with the consent of their own conscience.

 

[ammodotcom]

I disagree. Eugenics, as I understand, lead to a increase in the fitness of a given genome. Propagating psychopaths will not increase the fitness of the human genome. I presume that those who have foisted this $#@! upon us have no intention of suffering the same treatment we are to receive, and may aptly be described as psychopaths (using propaganda to brainwash the whole species into taking an experimental gene therapy to say nothing of the recent wars).

Its intragroup competition of the most barbaric sort...

Fitness is relative to environment. A bear that is fit in the arctic, for example, would not be fit in the rainforest. If psychopaths create an ideal environment for psychopaths, then they're going to survive famously.

 

[pcosmar]